Nilüfer Bal, Özge Gedik Toker, H. Hüsam, S. Özdemir, Bartlomiej Dao Lien
{"title":"窄带水平特异性ce啁啾优化听觉脑干反应测试","authors":"Nilüfer Bal, Özge Gedik Toker, H. Hüsam, S. Özdemir, Bartlomiej Dao Lien","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1764180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of narrow band level-specific Claus Elberling-Chirp (NB LS CE-Chirp) and LS CE-Chirp stimuli on the amplitudes, latencies, and interpeak latencies in comparison with tone burst (TB) and click. Methods A total of 40 ears (10 males, 10 females; age range: 20–26) individuals who had no complaints related to hearing participated in the study. Differences between click and LS CE-Chirp, frequency-specific (500—1,000—2,000—4,000) TB, and NB LS CE-Chirp were investigated at stimuli intensity of 70 decibel normal hearing loss (dBnHL). Results Absolute latencies were obtained longer in LS CE-Chirp than click stimulus, except wave V. At all frequencies, absolute latencies of I-III-V waves obtained with TB were significantly longer than those obtained with NB LS CE-Chirp. Amplitudes were higher in NB LS CE-Chirp compared to click and TB at all frequencies except 500 Hz. Conclusion The use of NB LS CE-Chirp is advantageous in patient assessment, but the benefit decreases at low frequencies. The differences in latency values of the stimuli should be taken into account in order to make a reliable interpretation of the results.","PeriodicalId":108664,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology and Neurotology","volume":"175 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Auditory Brainstem Response Test with Narrow Band Level-Specific CE-Chirps\",\"authors\":\"Nilüfer Bal, Özge Gedik Toker, H. Hüsam, S. Özdemir, Bartlomiej Dao Lien\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1764180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of narrow band level-specific Claus Elberling-Chirp (NB LS CE-Chirp) and LS CE-Chirp stimuli on the amplitudes, latencies, and interpeak latencies in comparison with tone burst (TB) and click. Methods A total of 40 ears (10 males, 10 females; age range: 20–26) individuals who had no complaints related to hearing participated in the study. Differences between click and LS CE-Chirp, frequency-specific (500—1,000—2,000—4,000) TB, and NB LS CE-Chirp were investigated at stimuli intensity of 70 decibel normal hearing loss (dBnHL). Results Absolute latencies were obtained longer in LS CE-Chirp than click stimulus, except wave V. At all frequencies, absolute latencies of I-III-V waves obtained with TB were significantly longer than those obtained with NB LS CE-Chirp. Amplitudes were higher in NB LS CE-Chirp compared to click and TB at all frequencies except 500 Hz. Conclusion The use of NB LS CE-Chirp is advantageous in patient assessment, but the benefit decreases at low frequencies. The differences in latency values of the stimuli should be taken into account in order to make a reliable interpretation of the results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Otology and Neurotology\",\"volume\":\"175 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Otology and Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology and Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要目的研究窄带水平特异性Claus Elberling-Chirp (NB - LS - CE-Chirp)和LS - CE-Chirp刺激对大鼠振幅、潜伏期和峰间潜伏期的影响,并与音调突发(TB)和咔嗒声进行比较。方法40只,公10只,母10只;年龄范围:20-26岁,没有听力问题的人参加了这项研究。在70分贝正常听力损失(dBnHL)刺激强度下,研究了click与LS CE-Chirp、频率特异性(500-1,000-2,000-4,000)TB和NB LS CE-Chirp之间的差异。结果除v波外,LS - CE-Chirp获得的绝对潜伏期均长于点击刺激。在所有频率下,TB获得的I-III-V波的绝对潜伏期均显著长于NB - LS - CE-Chirp。在除500 Hz外的所有频率下,NB - LS CE-Chirp的振幅都高于click和TB。结论NB - LS CE-Chirp在患者评估中具有优势,但在低频时优势降低。为了对结果作出可靠的解释,应考虑到刺激潜伏期值的差异。
Optimizing Auditory Brainstem Response Test with Narrow Band Level-Specific CE-Chirps
Abstract Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of narrow band level-specific Claus Elberling-Chirp (NB LS CE-Chirp) and LS CE-Chirp stimuli on the amplitudes, latencies, and interpeak latencies in comparison with tone burst (TB) and click. Methods A total of 40 ears (10 males, 10 females; age range: 20–26) individuals who had no complaints related to hearing participated in the study. Differences between click and LS CE-Chirp, frequency-specific (500—1,000—2,000—4,000) TB, and NB LS CE-Chirp were investigated at stimuli intensity of 70 decibel normal hearing loss (dBnHL). Results Absolute latencies were obtained longer in LS CE-Chirp than click stimulus, except wave V. At all frequencies, absolute latencies of I-III-V waves obtained with TB were significantly longer than those obtained with NB LS CE-Chirp. Amplitudes were higher in NB LS CE-Chirp compared to click and TB at all frequencies except 500 Hz. Conclusion The use of NB LS CE-Chirp is advantageous in patient assessment, but the benefit decreases at low frequencies. The differences in latency values of the stimuli should be taken into account in order to make a reliable interpretation of the results.