在工程技术项目中,为评估项目成果制定绩效标准和措施

Mohan A Ketkar, Nripendra N Sarker
{"title":"在工程技术项目中,为评估项目成果制定绩效标准和措施","authors":"Mohan A Ketkar, Nripendra N Sarker","doi":"10.18260/1-2-620-38605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the advent of EC 2000, Engineering Technology programs have grappled with methods for assessing the ABET outcomes, especially those skills which are not taught in the traditional technology courses. This paper presents the development of performance criteria and measures for detailed assessment of specific students’ performance in the program outcomes in an Engineering Technology (TAC 2007-2008 Criterion 2, a-k outcomes). Performance criteria have been used to break down each program outcome into concrete measurable actions that students are expected to be able to demonstrate proficiency in the outcome. Defining performance criteria for outcomes is not only the first important step to meaningful assessment of outcomes but also the first step in eliminating ambiguity in the interpretation of outcomes that could vary from faculty to faculty. For each of the listed outcomes for the ABET Accreditation bodies, detailed performance criteria are presented in this paper. Suggestions on how the performance criteria can be used in a program are described in detail to allow selective adoption of the performance criteria for different courses. The methodology for defining and using the performance criteria described in this paper enables faculty to (1) fully understand the outcomes, (2) understand a range of performance criteria that need to be measured for each outcome, and (3) remove any ambiguity in the interpretation of the outcomes. In addition, it makes it possible to identify the critical skill-sets to measure for each outcome and makes assessment meaningful for engineering technology programs.","PeriodicalId":315415,"journal":{"name":"2008 GSW Proceedings","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AND MEASURES FOR ASSESSING PROGRAM OUTCOMES IN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS\",\"authors\":\"Mohan A Ketkar, Nripendra N Sarker\",\"doi\":\"10.18260/1-2-620-38605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the advent of EC 2000, Engineering Technology programs have grappled with methods for assessing the ABET outcomes, especially those skills which are not taught in the traditional technology courses. This paper presents the development of performance criteria and measures for detailed assessment of specific students’ performance in the program outcomes in an Engineering Technology (TAC 2007-2008 Criterion 2, a-k outcomes). Performance criteria have been used to break down each program outcome into concrete measurable actions that students are expected to be able to demonstrate proficiency in the outcome. Defining performance criteria for outcomes is not only the first important step to meaningful assessment of outcomes but also the first step in eliminating ambiguity in the interpretation of outcomes that could vary from faculty to faculty. For each of the listed outcomes for the ABET Accreditation bodies, detailed performance criteria are presented in this paper. Suggestions on how the performance criteria can be used in a program are described in detail to allow selective adoption of the performance criteria for different courses. The methodology for defining and using the performance criteria described in this paper enables faculty to (1) fully understand the outcomes, (2) understand a range of performance criteria that need to be measured for each outcome, and (3) remove any ambiguity in the interpretation of the outcomes. In addition, it makes it possible to identify the critical skill-sets to measure for each outcome and makes assessment meaningful for engineering technology programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 GSW Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 GSW Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-620-38605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 GSW Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-620-38605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在EC 2000的到来中,工程技术课程已经在努力寻找评估ABET结果的方法,特别是那些在传统技术课程中没有教授的技能。本文介绍了在工程技术项目成果中详细评估特定学生表现的绩效标准和措施的发展(TAC 2007-2008标准2,a-k结果)。绩效标准被用来将每个项目的成果分解为具体的可衡量的行动,学生们被期望能够证明对结果的熟练程度。定义结果的表现标准不仅是对结果进行有意义评估的第一步,也是消除对结果解释歧义的第一步,这些歧义可能因学院而异。对于ABET认证机构列出的每一个结果,详细的绩效标准都在本文中提出。详细描述了如何在课程中使用绩效标准的建议,以便有选择地采用不同课程的绩效标准。定义和使用本文中描述的绩效标准的方法使教师能够(1)充分理解结果,(2)理解需要为每个结果测量的一系列绩效标准,以及(3)消除对结果解释中的任何歧义。此外,它可以确定每个结果的关键技能集,并使评估对工程技术计划有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AND MEASURES FOR ASSESSING PROGRAM OUTCOMES IN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS
In the advent of EC 2000, Engineering Technology programs have grappled with methods for assessing the ABET outcomes, especially those skills which are not taught in the traditional technology courses. This paper presents the development of performance criteria and measures for detailed assessment of specific students’ performance in the program outcomes in an Engineering Technology (TAC 2007-2008 Criterion 2, a-k outcomes). Performance criteria have been used to break down each program outcome into concrete measurable actions that students are expected to be able to demonstrate proficiency in the outcome. Defining performance criteria for outcomes is not only the first important step to meaningful assessment of outcomes but also the first step in eliminating ambiguity in the interpretation of outcomes that could vary from faculty to faculty. For each of the listed outcomes for the ABET Accreditation bodies, detailed performance criteria are presented in this paper. Suggestions on how the performance criteria can be used in a program are described in detail to allow selective adoption of the performance criteria for different courses. The methodology for defining and using the performance criteria described in this paper enables faculty to (1) fully understand the outcomes, (2) understand a range of performance criteria that need to be measured for each outcome, and (3) remove any ambiguity in the interpretation of the outcomes. In addition, it makes it possible to identify the critical skill-sets to measure for each outcome and makes assessment meaningful for engineering technology programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信