通过故障仿真和激光测试对NASA空间立方体应用进行了实际表征

J. Walters, K. Zick, M. French
{"title":"通过故障仿真和激光测试对NASA空间立方体应用进行了实际表征","authors":"J. Walters, K. Zick, M. French","doi":"10.1109/DSN.2013.6575354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historically, space-based processing systems have lagged behind their terrestrial counterparts by several processor generations due, in part, to the cost and complexity of implementing radiation-hardened processor designs. Efforts such as NASA's SpaceCube seek to change this paradigm, using higher performance commercial hardware wherever possible. This has the potential to revolutionize onboard data processing, but it cannot happen unless the soft error reliability can be characterized and deemed sufficient. A variety of fault injection techniques are used to evaluate system reliability, most commonly fault emulation, fault simulation, laser testing, and particle beam testing. Combining multiple techniques is more complex and less common. In this study we characterize a real-world application that leverages a radiation-hardening by software (RHBSW) solution for the SpaceCube platform, using two fault injection strategies: laser testing and fault emulation. We describe several valuable lessons learned, and show how both validation techniques can be combined to greater effect.","PeriodicalId":163407,"journal":{"name":"2013 43rd Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A practical characterization of a NASA SpaceCube application through fault emulation and laser testing\",\"authors\":\"J. Walters, K. Zick, M. French\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DSN.2013.6575354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Historically, space-based processing systems have lagged behind their terrestrial counterparts by several processor generations due, in part, to the cost and complexity of implementing radiation-hardened processor designs. Efforts such as NASA's SpaceCube seek to change this paradigm, using higher performance commercial hardware wherever possible. This has the potential to revolutionize onboard data processing, but it cannot happen unless the soft error reliability can be characterized and deemed sufficient. A variety of fault injection techniques are used to evaluate system reliability, most commonly fault emulation, fault simulation, laser testing, and particle beam testing. Combining multiple techniques is more complex and less common. In this study we characterize a real-world application that leverages a radiation-hardening by software (RHBSW) solution for the SpaceCube platform, using two fault injection strategies: laser testing and fault emulation. We describe several valuable lessons learned, and show how both validation techniques can be combined to greater effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":163407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 43rd Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 43rd Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2013.6575354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 43rd Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2013.6575354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

从历史上看,由于实现抗辐射处理器设计的成本和复杂性,天基处理系统已经落后于地面处理系统好几代。NASA的太空立方(SpaceCube)等项目试图改变这种模式,尽可能使用性能更高的商用硬件。这有可能彻底改变机载数据处理,但除非软错误可靠性能够被表征并被认为是足够的,否则无法实现。各种各样的故障注入技术被用来评估系统的可靠性,最常见的是故障仿真、故障模拟、激光测试和粒子束测试。结合多种技术更复杂,也更不常见。在这项研究中,我们描述了一个现实世界的应用,该应用利用软件辐射硬化(RHBSW)解决方案为SpaceCube平台,使用两种故障注入策略:激光测试和故障仿真。我们描述了一些有价值的经验教训,并展示了如何将这两种验证技术结合起来以获得更大的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A practical characterization of a NASA SpaceCube application through fault emulation and laser testing
Historically, space-based processing systems have lagged behind their terrestrial counterparts by several processor generations due, in part, to the cost and complexity of implementing radiation-hardened processor designs. Efforts such as NASA's SpaceCube seek to change this paradigm, using higher performance commercial hardware wherever possible. This has the potential to revolutionize onboard data processing, but it cannot happen unless the soft error reliability can be characterized and deemed sufficient. A variety of fault injection techniques are used to evaluate system reliability, most commonly fault emulation, fault simulation, laser testing, and particle beam testing. Combining multiple techniques is more complex and less common. In this study we characterize a real-world application that leverages a radiation-hardening by software (RHBSW) solution for the SpaceCube platform, using two fault injection strategies: laser testing and fault emulation. We describe several valuable lessons learned, and show how both validation techniques can be combined to greater effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信