利用近红外光谱技术表征现实人机交互中情感的时间变化

M. Strait, Matthias Scheutz
{"title":"利用近红外光谱技术表征现实人机交互中情感的时间变化","authors":"M. Strait, Matthias Scheutz","doi":"10.5220/0004902203850392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent work in HRI found that prefrontal hemodynamic activity correlated with participants’ aversions to certain robots. Using a combination of brain-based objective measures and survey-based subjective measures, it was shown that increasing the presence (co-located vs. remote interaction) and human-likeness of the robot engaged greater neural activity in the prefrontal cortex and severely decreased preferences for future interactions. The results of this study suggest that brain-based measures may be able to capture participants’ affective responses (aversion vs. affinity), and in a variety of interaction settings. However, the brain-based evidence of this work is limited to temporally-brief (6-second) post-interaction samples. Hence, it remains unknown whether such measures can capture affective responses over the course of the interactions (rather than post-hoc). Here we extend the previous analysis to look at changes in brain activity over the time course of more realistic human-robot interactions. In particular, we replicate the previous findings, and moreover find qualitative evidence suggesting the measurability of fluctuations in affect over the course of the full","PeriodicalId":326453,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Physiological Computing Systems","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Index Temporal Changes in Affect in Realistic Human-robot Interactions\",\"authors\":\"M. Strait, Matthias Scheutz\",\"doi\":\"10.5220/0004902203850392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent work in HRI found that prefrontal hemodynamic activity correlated with participants’ aversions to certain robots. Using a combination of brain-based objective measures and survey-based subjective measures, it was shown that increasing the presence (co-located vs. remote interaction) and human-likeness of the robot engaged greater neural activity in the prefrontal cortex and severely decreased preferences for future interactions. The results of this study suggest that brain-based measures may be able to capture participants’ affective responses (aversion vs. affinity), and in a variety of interaction settings. However, the brain-based evidence of this work is limited to temporally-brief (6-second) post-interaction samples. Hence, it remains unknown whether such measures can capture affective responses over the course of the interactions (rather than post-hoc). Here we extend the previous analysis to look at changes in brain activity over the time course of more realistic human-robot interactions. In particular, we replicate the previous findings, and moreover find qualitative evidence suggesting the measurability of fluctuations in affect over the course of the full\",\"PeriodicalId\":326453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Physiological Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Physiological Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5220/0004902203850392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Physiological Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0004902203850392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

HRI最近的研究发现,前额叶血流动力学活动与参与者对某些机器人的厌恶有关。结合基于大脑的客观测量和基于调查的主观测量,研究表明,增加机器人的存在(同地互动vs远程互动)和与人的相似性会增加前额叶皮层的神经活动,并严重降低对未来互动的偏好。这项研究的结果表明,基于大脑的测量可能能够捕捉到参与者在各种互动环境中的情感反应(厌恶与亲和)。然而,这项工作的基于大脑的证据仅限于短暂的(6秒)交互后样本。因此,尚不清楚这些措施是否可以在互动过程中(而不是事后)捕获情感反应。在这里,我们扩展了之前的分析,以观察在更现实的人机交互过程中大脑活动的变化。特别是,我们重复了以前的研究结果,而且还发现了定性证据,表明在整个过程中影响波动的可测量性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Index Temporal Changes in Affect in Realistic Human-robot Interactions
Recent work in HRI found that prefrontal hemodynamic activity correlated with participants’ aversions to certain robots. Using a combination of brain-based objective measures and survey-based subjective measures, it was shown that increasing the presence (co-located vs. remote interaction) and human-likeness of the robot engaged greater neural activity in the prefrontal cortex and severely decreased preferences for future interactions. The results of this study suggest that brain-based measures may be able to capture participants’ affective responses (aversion vs. affinity), and in a variety of interaction settings. However, the brain-based evidence of this work is limited to temporally-brief (6-second) post-interaction samples. Hence, it remains unknown whether such measures can capture affective responses over the course of the interactions (rather than post-hoc). Here we extend the previous analysis to look at changes in brain activity over the time course of more realistic human-robot interactions. In particular, we replicate the previous findings, and moreover find qualitative evidence suggesting the measurability of fluctuations in affect over the course of the full
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信