略论印度宪法第142条的限制:宪法的必要性

Shailendra Kumar
{"title":"略论印度宪法第142条的限制:宪法的必要性","authors":"Shailendra Kumar","doi":"10.1017/9781108870184.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 142 of the Constitution of India reads: \n \nThus, article 142 vests the Supreme Court of India with a repository of discretionary power that can be wielded in appropriate circumstances to deliver ‘complete justice’ in a given case. It is pertinent to mention here that no other constitution in the world contains similar provisions except for two very recent constitutions, that is, Bangladesh (article 104) and Nepal (article 88[2]), both of which seem to have borrowed the provisions from the Constitution of India. \n \nThe term ‘complete justice’ is comprised of two words, that is, ‘complete’ and ‘justice’. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines ‘complete’ as ‘having all necessary parts, elements, or steps or thorough or concluded’, whereas ‘Justice’ has been understood and defined by various scholars, philosophers, and social scientists in various ways and connotations. Plato defines it thus: ‘Justice is a proper, harmonious relationship between the warring parts of the person or city’. Hobbes and Rousseau understand ‘Justice’ as a process of giving and protecting the rights and liberties of a person.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"816 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sketching the Limits of Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Constitutional Necessity\",\"authors\":\"Shailendra Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108870184.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Article 142 of the Constitution of India reads: \\n \\nThus, article 142 vests the Supreme Court of India with a repository of discretionary power that can be wielded in appropriate circumstances to deliver ‘complete justice’ in a given case. It is pertinent to mention here that no other constitution in the world contains similar provisions except for two very recent constitutions, that is, Bangladesh (article 104) and Nepal (article 88[2]), both of which seem to have borrowed the provisions from the Constitution of India. \\n \\nThe term ‘complete justice’ is comprised of two words, that is, ‘complete’ and ‘justice’. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines ‘complete’ as ‘having all necessary parts, elements, or steps or thorough or concluded’, whereas ‘Justice’ has been understood and defined by various scholars, philosophers, and social scientists in various ways and connotations. Plato defines it thus: ‘Justice is a proper, harmonious relationship between the warring parts of the person or city’. Hobbes and Rousseau understand ‘Justice’ as a process of giving and protecting the rights and liberties of a person.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"816 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108870184.021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108870184.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度宪法第142条规定:因此,第142条赋予印度最高法院自由裁量权,可以在适当情况下行使,在特定案件中实现“完全正义”。这里有必要指出,除了最近的两部宪法,即孟加拉国(第104条)和尼泊尔(第88条[2])外,世界上没有其他宪法载有类似的规定,这两部宪法似乎都借鉴了印度宪法的规定。“完全正义”一词由两个词组成,即“完全”和“正义”。《韦氏词典》将“complete”定义为“拥有所有必要的部分、元素或步骤或彻底或结束”,而“Justice”则被各种学者、哲学家和社会科学家以各种方式和内涵理解和定义。柏拉图这样定义它:“正义是人或城市交战部分之间适当的、和谐的关系。”霍布斯和卢梭将“正义”理解为给予和保护一个人的权利和自由的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sketching the Limits of Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Constitutional Necessity
Article 142 of the Constitution of India reads: Thus, article 142 vests the Supreme Court of India with a repository of discretionary power that can be wielded in appropriate circumstances to deliver ‘complete justice’ in a given case. It is pertinent to mention here that no other constitution in the world contains similar provisions except for two very recent constitutions, that is, Bangladesh (article 104) and Nepal (article 88[2]), both of which seem to have borrowed the provisions from the Constitution of India. The term ‘complete justice’ is comprised of two words, that is, ‘complete’ and ‘justice’. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines ‘complete’ as ‘having all necessary parts, elements, or steps or thorough or concluded’, whereas ‘Justice’ has been understood and defined by various scholars, philosophers, and social scientists in various ways and connotations. Plato defines it thus: ‘Justice is a proper, harmonious relationship between the warring parts of the person or city’. Hobbes and Rousseau understand ‘Justice’ as a process of giving and protecting the rights and liberties of a person.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信