银行破产:从雷曼兄弟到新冠肺炎(国际评论和各国特点)

A. Zahariev, Stoyan Prodanov, A. Radulova, G. Zaharieva, M. Pavlova, P. Angelov, T. Ismailov, A. Aleksandrova, Kristi Marinova
{"title":"银行破产:从雷曼兄弟到新冠肺炎(国际评论和各国特点)","authors":"A. Zahariev, Stoyan Prodanov, A. Radulova, G. Zaharieva, M. Pavlova, P. Angelov, T. Ismailov, A. Aleksandrova, Kristi Marinova","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3688961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study of the international experience of applicable policies for crisis management in the credit system in bank insolvency, identifies three types of solutions, including: elimination of the \"toxic element\" in the banking system following the example of \"Lehman Brothers\" in the US from 15 09 2008 through a voluntary insolvency procedure declared by the bank's management before the respective regulatory body;support for the financially troubled institution through nationalization and a reform plan following the example of Northern Rock in the UK from 2007-2008 and Greek banks from the Greek debt crisis after 2010;liquidation of the \"toxic element\" in the banking system, following the example of CCB in Bulgaria (2014-2020), through a regulatory insolvency procedure Each of the three policies has its pros and cons, but it definitely has a \"stressful\" impact on banking systems and economic agents with long-term consequences, incl in the context of the TBTF doctrine On this basis, international regulators are introducing the methodology of bank stress tests for early warning of bank insolvency The study of the experience of the central banks, BIS and ECB for conducting stress tests brings to the fore their grouping by three criteria: first criteria - Type of stress test, which distinguishes stress tests conducted by macroprudential authorities for the purpose of assessing broad systemic risks, stress tests conducted by microprudential authorities for supervisory purposes and stress tests by the internal bank risk management for the purposes of assessing capital adequacy policies;second criteria - Focus of the stress test, which distinguishes systematic assessments at the institutional level, measuring mainly solvency or liquidity, assessments on the first and second pillars of Basel II, as well as assessments of financial instruments, investment portfolios, business sectors from institutional positions to prepare models for decision-making by the central banking management regarding the response to the various risks;and third criteria - Approach to conducting the stress test, which is grouped into two categories, top - down and vice versa, bottom - up These approaches must be tested with the new environment for COVID-19 as a global systemic risk generator Its impact on the creditworthiness of companies, households and the state can be assessed as extremely negative and testing the capital adequacy of commercial banks under BASEL III framework","PeriodicalId":269529,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Bank Insolvency: From Lehman Brothers to COVID-19 (International Remarks and National Peculiarities)\",\"authors\":\"A. Zahariev, Stoyan Prodanov, A. Radulova, G. Zaharieva, M. Pavlova, P. Angelov, T. Ismailov, A. Aleksandrova, Kristi Marinova\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3688961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A study of the international experience of applicable policies for crisis management in the credit system in bank insolvency, identifies three types of solutions, including: elimination of the \\\"toxic element\\\" in the banking system following the example of \\\"Lehman Brothers\\\" in the US from 15 09 2008 through a voluntary insolvency procedure declared by the bank's management before the respective regulatory body;support for the financially troubled institution through nationalization and a reform plan following the example of Northern Rock in the UK from 2007-2008 and Greek banks from the Greek debt crisis after 2010;liquidation of the \\\"toxic element\\\" in the banking system, following the example of CCB in Bulgaria (2014-2020), through a regulatory insolvency procedure Each of the three policies has its pros and cons, but it definitely has a \\\"stressful\\\" impact on banking systems and economic agents with long-term consequences, incl in the context of the TBTF doctrine On this basis, international regulators are introducing the methodology of bank stress tests for early warning of bank insolvency The study of the experience of the central banks, BIS and ECB for conducting stress tests brings to the fore their grouping by three criteria: first criteria - Type of stress test, which distinguishes stress tests conducted by macroprudential authorities for the purpose of assessing broad systemic risks, stress tests conducted by microprudential authorities for supervisory purposes and stress tests by the internal bank risk management for the purposes of assessing capital adequacy policies;second criteria - Focus of the stress test, which distinguishes systematic assessments at the institutional level, measuring mainly solvency or liquidity, assessments on the first and second pillars of Basel II, as well as assessments of financial instruments, investment portfolios, business sectors from institutional positions to prepare models for decision-making by the central banking management regarding the response to the various risks;and third criteria - Approach to conducting the stress test, which is grouped into two categories, top - down and vice versa, bottom - up These approaches must be tested with the new environment for COVID-19 as a global systemic risk generator Its impact on the creditworthiness of companies, households and the state can be assessed as extremely negative and testing the capital adequacy of commercial banks under BASEL III framework\",\"PeriodicalId\":269529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3688961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3688961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

对银行破产情况下信贷系统危机管理适用政策的国际经验进行的一项研究确定了三种解决办法,包括:以2008年9月15日的美国“雷曼兄弟”为例,通过银行管理层在各自监管机构面前宣布的自愿破产程序,消除银行体系中的“有毒因素”;以2007-2008年英国北岩银行(Northern Rock)和2010年后希腊债务危机中的希腊银行为例,通过国有化和改革计划,支持陷入财务困境的机构;清算银行业中的“有毒因素”三种政策中的每一种都有其优点和缺点,但它肯定对银行体系和具有长期后果的经济主体产生“压力”影响,包括在TBTF理论的背景下。在此基础上,国际监管机构正在引入银行压力测试方法,以对银行破产进行早期预警。国际清算银行和欧洲央行在进行压力测试时,根据以下三个标准进行分组:第一项标准——压力测试的类型,区分宏观审慎当局为评估广泛的系统性风险而进行的压力测试、微观审慎当局为监管目的进行的压力测试和银行内部风险管理机构为评估资本充足率政策而进行的压力测试;第二项标准——压力测试的重点,区分机构一级的系统评估;主要衡量偿付能力或流动性,对巴塞尔协议II的第一和第二支柱的评估,以及对金融工具、投资组合、机构立场的商业部门的评估,为中央银行管理部门就各种风险的反应制定决策模型;第三个标准-进行压力测试的方法,分为两类,自上而下,反之亦然。这些方法必须在新环境下进行测试,因为COVID-19是全球系统性风险的产生者,它对公司、家庭和国家的信誉的影响可以被评估为极其负面,并在巴塞尔协议III框架下测试商业银行的资本充足率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Bank Insolvency: From Lehman Brothers to COVID-19 (International Remarks and National Peculiarities)
A study of the international experience of applicable policies for crisis management in the credit system in bank insolvency, identifies three types of solutions, including: elimination of the "toxic element" in the banking system following the example of "Lehman Brothers" in the US from 15 09 2008 through a voluntary insolvency procedure declared by the bank's management before the respective regulatory body;support for the financially troubled institution through nationalization and a reform plan following the example of Northern Rock in the UK from 2007-2008 and Greek banks from the Greek debt crisis after 2010;liquidation of the "toxic element" in the banking system, following the example of CCB in Bulgaria (2014-2020), through a regulatory insolvency procedure Each of the three policies has its pros and cons, but it definitely has a "stressful" impact on banking systems and economic agents with long-term consequences, incl in the context of the TBTF doctrine On this basis, international regulators are introducing the methodology of bank stress tests for early warning of bank insolvency The study of the experience of the central banks, BIS and ECB for conducting stress tests brings to the fore their grouping by three criteria: first criteria - Type of stress test, which distinguishes stress tests conducted by macroprudential authorities for the purpose of assessing broad systemic risks, stress tests conducted by microprudential authorities for supervisory purposes and stress tests by the internal bank risk management for the purposes of assessing capital adequacy policies;second criteria - Focus of the stress test, which distinguishes systematic assessments at the institutional level, measuring mainly solvency or liquidity, assessments on the first and second pillars of Basel II, as well as assessments of financial instruments, investment portfolios, business sectors from institutional positions to prepare models for decision-making by the central banking management regarding the response to the various risks;and third criteria - Approach to conducting the stress test, which is grouped into two categories, top - down and vice versa, bottom - up These approaches must be tested with the new environment for COVID-19 as a global systemic risk generator Its impact on the creditworthiness of companies, households and the state can be assessed as extremely negative and testing the capital adequacy of commercial banks under BASEL III framework
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信