第二次独立诊断测试在医学诊断中有用吗

Kasumi Iwamoto, Ryo Tajiri, Keigo Fujikawa, T. Yanagawa
{"title":"第二次独立诊断测试在医学诊断中有用吗","authors":"Kasumi Iwamoto, Ryo Tajiri, Keigo Fujikawa, T. Yanagawa","doi":"10.5691/JJB.36.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider usefulness of the second diagnostic test in medical diagnosis from the point of view of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). We assume in this paper that medical diagnosis is given by the result of a single diagnostic test or group discussions of experts. We call the process the diagnostic test and consider the situation where an individual has chance to undergo two diagnostic tests. When the second diagnostic test is undertaken, two decision rules, Rule 1 and Rule 2, may be considered. Rule 1 is judge positive if the both tests are positive and negative otherwise. Rule 2 is judge negative if both tests are negative and positive otherwise. The test is called reasonable if, and only if it selects diseased person with higher probability than it does non-diseased persons. It is shown that when the first and second tests are reasonable, usefulness of the second test depends on one’s priority on PPV or NPV and whether one takes Rule 1 or Rule 2.","PeriodicalId":365545,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of biometrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Second Independent Diagnostic Test in Medical Diagnosis Useful\",\"authors\":\"Kasumi Iwamoto, Ryo Tajiri, Keigo Fujikawa, T. Yanagawa\",\"doi\":\"10.5691/JJB.36.53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider usefulness of the second diagnostic test in medical diagnosis from the point of view of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). We assume in this paper that medical diagnosis is given by the result of a single diagnostic test or group discussions of experts. We call the process the diagnostic test and consider the situation where an individual has chance to undergo two diagnostic tests. When the second diagnostic test is undertaken, two decision rules, Rule 1 and Rule 2, may be considered. Rule 1 is judge positive if the both tests are positive and negative otherwise. Rule 2 is judge negative if both tests are negative and positive otherwise. The test is called reasonable if, and only if it selects diseased person with higher probability than it does non-diseased persons. It is shown that when the first and second tests are reasonable, usefulness of the second test depends on one’s priority on PPV or NPV and whether one takes Rule 1 or Rule 2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese journal of biometrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese journal of biometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5691/JJB.36.53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5691/JJB.36.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们从阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)的角度考虑二次诊断试验在医学诊断中的有用性。在本文中,我们假设医学诊断是由单个诊断测试或专家小组讨论的结果给出的。我们把这个过程称为诊断测试,并考虑一个人有机会接受两种诊断测试的情况。当进行第二次诊断测试时,可以考虑两个决策规则,规则1和规则2。如果两个测试都是阳性,则判定规则1为阳性,否则为阴性。规则2如果两个测试都是阴性,则判定为阴性,否则判定为阳性。当且仅当该检验选择患病人群的概率高于选择非患病人群的概率时,该检验被称为合理检验。结果表明,当第一个和第二个测试是合理的,第二个测试的有用性取决于一个人对PPV或NPV的优先级,以及一个人是采用规则1还是规则2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is the Second Independent Diagnostic Test in Medical Diagnosis Useful
We consider usefulness of the second diagnostic test in medical diagnosis from the point of view of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). We assume in this paper that medical diagnosis is given by the result of a single diagnostic test or group discussions of experts. We call the process the diagnostic test and consider the situation where an individual has chance to undergo two diagnostic tests. When the second diagnostic test is undertaken, two decision rules, Rule 1 and Rule 2, may be considered. Rule 1 is judge positive if the both tests are positive and negative otherwise. Rule 2 is judge negative if both tests are negative and positive otherwise. The test is called reasonable if, and only if it selects diseased person with higher probability than it does non-diseased persons. It is shown that when the first and second tests are reasonable, usefulness of the second test depends on one’s priority on PPV or NPV and whether one takes Rule 1 or Rule 2.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信