调强质子治疗从基于测量到结合患者特异性质量保证的转变。

Mei Chen, P. Yepes, Y. Hojo, F. Poenisch, Yupeng Li, Cheng Xu, Xiao-dong He, Jiayi Chen, G. Gunn, S. Frank, N. Sahoo, Heng Li, X. Zhu, Xiaodong Zhang
{"title":"调强质子治疗从基于测量到结合患者特异性质量保证的转变。","authors":"Mei Chen, P. Yepes, Y. Hojo, F. Poenisch, Yupeng Li, Cheng Xu, Xiao-dong He, Jiayi Chen, G. Gunn, S. Frank, N. Sahoo, Heng Li, X. Zhu, Xiaodong Zhang","doi":"10.1259/bjr.20190669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThis study is part of ongoing efforts aiming to transit from measurement-based to combined patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) in intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). A Monte Carlo (MC) dose-calculation algorithm is used to improve the independent dose calculation and to reveal the beam modeling deficiency of the analytical pencil beam (PB) algorithm.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA set of representative clinical IMPT plans with suboptimal PSQA results were reviewed. Verification plans were recalculated using an MC algorithm developed in-house. Agreements of PB and MC calculations with measurements that quantified by the γ passing rate were compared.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe percentage of dose planes that met the clinical criteria for PSQA (>90% γ passing rate using 3%/3 mm criteria) increased from 71.40% in the original PB calculation to 95.14% in the MC recalculation. For fields without beam modifiers, nearly 100% of the dose planes exceeded the 95% γ passing rate threshold using the MC algorithm. The model deficiencies of the PB algorithm were found in the proximal and distal regions of the SOBP, where MC recalculation improved the γ passing rate by 11.27% (p < 0.001) and 16.80% (p < 0.001), respectively.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe MC algorithm substantially improved the γ passing rate for IMPT PSQA. Improved modeling of beam modifiers would enable the use of the MC algorithm for independent dose calculation, completely replacing additional depth measurements in IMPT PSQA program. For current users of the PB algorithm, further improving the long-tail modeling or using MC simulation to generate the dose correction factor is necessary.\n\n\nADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE\nWe justified a change in clinical practice to achieve efficient combined PSQA in IMPT by using the MC algorithm that was experimentally validated in almost all the clinical scenarios in our center. Deficiencies in beam modeling of the current PB algorithm were identified and solutions to improve its dose calculation accuracy were provided.","PeriodicalId":226783,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of radiology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transitioning from measurement-based to combined patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated proton therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Mei Chen, P. Yepes, Y. Hojo, F. Poenisch, Yupeng Li, Cheng Xu, Xiao-dong He, Jiayi Chen, G. Gunn, S. Frank, N. Sahoo, Heng Li, X. Zhu, Xiaodong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1259/bjr.20190669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nThis study is part of ongoing efforts aiming to transit from measurement-based to combined patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) in intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). A Monte Carlo (MC) dose-calculation algorithm is used to improve the independent dose calculation and to reveal the beam modeling deficiency of the analytical pencil beam (PB) algorithm.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA set of representative clinical IMPT plans with suboptimal PSQA results were reviewed. Verification plans were recalculated using an MC algorithm developed in-house. Agreements of PB and MC calculations with measurements that quantified by the γ passing rate were compared.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe percentage of dose planes that met the clinical criteria for PSQA (>90% γ passing rate using 3%/3 mm criteria) increased from 71.40% in the original PB calculation to 95.14% in the MC recalculation. For fields without beam modifiers, nearly 100% of the dose planes exceeded the 95% γ passing rate threshold using the MC algorithm. The model deficiencies of the PB algorithm were found in the proximal and distal regions of the SOBP, where MC recalculation improved the γ passing rate by 11.27% (p < 0.001) and 16.80% (p < 0.001), respectively.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThe MC algorithm substantially improved the γ passing rate for IMPT PSQA. Improved modeling of beam modifiers would enable the use of the MC algorithm for independent dose calculation, completely replacing additional depth measurements in IMPT PSQA program. For current users of the PB algorithm, further improving the long-tail modeling or using MC simulation to generate the dose correction factor is necessary.\\n\\n\\nADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE\\nWe justified a change in clinical practice to achieve efficient combined PSQA in IMPT by using the MC algorithm that was experimentally validated in almost all the clinical scenarios in our center. Deficiencies in beam modeling of the current PB algorithm were identified and solutions to improve its dose calculation accuracy were provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of radiology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:本研究旨在从基于测量的调强质子治疗(IMPT)过渡到联合患者特异性质量保证(PSQA)的持续努力的一部分。采用蒙特卡罗(MC)剂量计算算法改进了独立剂量计算,揭示了解析铅笔束(PB)算法在光束建模方面的不足。方法对一组具有代表性的PSQA结果不理想的临床IMPT方案进行回顾性分析。使用内部开发的MC算法重新计算验证计划。比较了PB和MC计算结果与γ通过率量化的测量结果的一致性。结果符合PSQA临床标准(3%/3 mm标准γ合格率>90%)的剂量面百分比由原PB计算的71.40%增加到MC重新计算的95.14%。对于没有光束修饰剂的场,使用MC算法,几乎100%的剂量面超过95% γ合格率阈值。在SOBP的近端和远端区域发现了PB算法的模型缺陷,其中MC重新计算的γ通过率分别提高了11.27% (p < 0.001)和16.80% (p < 0.001)。结论MC算法显著提高了IMPT PSQA的γ通过率。改进的光束修正器建模将允许使用MC算法进行独立剂量计算,完全取代IMPT PSQA程序中额外的深度测量。对于目前使用PB算法的用户,有必要进一步改进长尾建模或使用MC模拟生成剂量校正因子。我们证明了临床实践的改变,通过使用MC算法在IMPT中实现有效的联合PSQA,该算法在我们中心几乎所有的临床场景中都得到了实验验证。指出了现行PB算法在光束建模方面存在的不足,并提出了提高其剂量计算精度的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transitioning from measurement-based to combined patient-specific quality assurance for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
OBJECTIVE This study is part of ongoing efforts aiming to transit from measurement-based to combined patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) in intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). A Monte Carlo (MC) dose-calculation algorithm is used to improve the independent dose calculation and to reveal the beam modeling deficiency of the analytical pencil beam (PB) algorithm. METHODS A set of representative clinical IMPT plans with suboptimal PSQA results were reviewed. Verification plans were recalculated using an MC algorithm developed in-house. Agreements of PB and MC calculations with measurements that quantified by the γ passing rate were compared. RESULTS The percentage of dose planes that met the clinical criteria for PSQA (>90% γ passing rate using 3%/3 mm criteria) increased from 71.40% in the original PB calculation to 95.14% in the MC recalculation. For fields without beam modifiers, nearly 100% of the dose planes exceeded the 95% γ passing rate threshold using the MC algorithm. The model deficiencies of the PB algorithm were found in the proximal and distal regions of the SOBP, where MC recalculation improved the γ passing rate by 11.27% (p < 0.001) and 16.80% (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The MC algorithm substantially improved the γ passing rate for IMPT PSQA. Improved modeling of beam modifiers would enable the use of the MC algorithm for independent dose calculation, completely replacing additional depth measurements in IMPT PSQA program. For current users of the PB algorithm, further improving the long-tail modeling or using MC simulation to generate the dose correction factor is necessary. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE We justified a change in clinical practice to achieve efficient combined PSQA in IMPT by using the MC algorithm that was experimentally validated in almost all the clinical scenarios in our center. Deficiencies in beam modeling of the current PB algorithm were identified and solutions to improve its dose calculation accuracy were provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信