减少带存储的随机多周期直流最优潮流的计算量

O. Mégel, G. Andersson, J. Mathieu
{"title":"减少带存储的随机多周期直流最优潮流的计算量","authors":"O. Mégel, G. Andersson, J. Mathieu","doi":"10.1109/PSCC.2016.7541033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the increase of intermittent renewable energy sources, it is becoming more important to consider renewable generation forecast error when solving the optimal power flow (OPF) problem. The stochastic OPF, which uses multiple forecast scenarios, generally leads to a lower cost compared to the standard deterministic OPF, which uses a single forecast. However, the stochastic OPF is computationally more demanding than the deterministic OPF. Both cost savings and computation times further increase when storage units or ramp-constrained generators are included, as they require solving a multi-period OPF problem. Our contribution is a hybrid method approaching the cost performance of the stochastic OPF while maintaining a computational burden close to the deterministic OPF. The method combines elements from both the stochastic and the deterministic OPF, and relies on Benders Cuts to interface them. Using a receding horizon approach over one year, we find that, based on eleven test cases, one version of our hybrid method leads to at least 70% of the cost improvement of the stochastic OPF, while the computation time increase is at most 40% of the stochastic OPF time increase. Furthermore, the computational advantage of our method increases with the system size. Two different versions of the method allow favoring of either the computational improvement or the cost improvement. We also identify directions for further improvement. Finally, our method can be used for more general problems in which one wishes to combine two models with different levels of complexity.","PeriodicalId":265395,"journal":{"name":"2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing the computational effort of stochastic multi-period DC optimal power flow with storage\",\"authors\":\"O. Mégel, G. Andersson, J. Mathieu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PSCC.2016.7541033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the increase of intermittent renewable energy sources, it is becoming more important to consider renewable generation forecast error when solving the optimal power flow (OPF) problem. The stochastic OPF, which uses multiple forecast scenarios, generally leads to a lower cost compared to the standard deterministic OPF, which uses a single forecast. However, the stochastic OPF is computationally more demanding than the deterministic OPF. Both cost savings and computation times further increase when storage units or ramp-constrained generators are included, as they require solving a multi-period OPF problem. Our contribution is a hybrid method approaching the cost performance of the stochastic OPF while maintaining a computational burden close to the deterministic OPF. The method combines elements from both the stochastic and the deterministic OPF, and relies on Benders Cuts to interface them. Using a receding horizon approach over one year, we find that, based on eleven test cases, one version of our hybrid method leads to at least 70% of the cost improvement of the stochastic OPF, while the computation time increase is at most 40% of the stochastic OPF time increase. Furthermore, the computational advantage of our method increases with the system size. Two different versions of the method allow favoring of either the computational improvement or the cost improvement. We also identify directions for further improvement. Finally, our method can be used for more general problems in which one wishes to combine two models with different levels of complexity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PSCC.2016.7541033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PSCC.2016.7541033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

随着间歇性可再生能源的增加,在求解最优潮流(OPF)问题时,考虑可再生能源发电预测误差变得越来越重要。与使用单一预测的标准确定性OPF相比,使用多个预测情景的随机OPF通常会导致更低的成本。然而,随机OPF比确定性OPF对计算量的要求更高。当包括存储单元或斜坡约束发电机时,成本节约和计算时间进一步增加,因为它们需要解决多周期OPF问题。我们的贡献是一种接近随机OPF的成本性能的混合方法,同时保持接近确定性OPF的计算负担。该方法结合了随机OPF和确定性OPF的元素,并依赖于弯曲切割来连接它们。在11个测试用例的基础上,我们发现混合方法的一个版本至少使随机OPF的成本提高了70%,而计算时间的增加最多是随机OPF时间增加的40%。此外,我们的方法的计算优势随着系统规模的增加而增加。该方法的两个不同版本允许支持计算改进或成本改进。我们还确定了进一步改进的方向。最后,我们的方法可以用于更一般的问题,在这些问题中,人们希望结合两个不同复杂程度的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing the computational effort of stochastic multi-period DC optimal power flow with storage
Due to the increase of intermittent renewable energy sources, it is becoming more important to consider renewable generation forecast error when solving the optimal power flow (OPF) problem. The stochastic OPF, which uses multiple forecast scenarios, generally leads to a lower cost compared to the standard deterministic OPF, which uses a single forecast. However, the stochastic OPF is computationally more demanding than the deterministic OPF. Both cost savings and computation times further increase when storage units or ramp-constrained generators are included, as they require solving a multi-period OPF problem. Our contribution is a hybrid method approaching the cost performance of the stochastic OPF while maintaining a computational burden close to the deterministic OPF. The method combines elements from both the stochastic and the deterministic OPF, and relies on Benders Cuts to interface them. Using a receding horizon approach over one year, we find that, based on eleven test cases, one version of our hybrid method leads to at least 70% of the cost improvement of the stochastic OPF, while the computation time increase is at most 40% of the stochastic OPF time increase. Furthermore, the computational advantage of our method increases with the system size. Two different versions of the method allow favoring of either the computational improvement or the cost improvement. We also identify directions for further improvement. Finally, our method can be used for more general problems in which one wishes to combine two models with different levels of complexity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信