设计沟通

Scott Jenson, Harry Sadler, Charlie Hill, C. Disalvo
{"title":"设计沟通","authors":"Scott Jenson, Harry Sadler, Charlie Hill, C. Disalvo","doi":"10.1145/1125451.1125465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why is design communication so hard? We've all been in the situation: a room full of people, a usability test with clear problems and obvious outcomes. Yet the team can't agree on a design solution. Why does this happen? How can intelligent people disagree so strongly when looking at the same data?.This panel approaches a problem that has not been discussed much at CHI: the social interaction of the design process.Each of the four panelists, who have broad industry experience in consulting, in-house design centers, and academics, will each take a different position on this problem. Is this simply a matter of vocabulary, process, experience, or competence?.This panel will start off with brief statements by each panel member and then spend the majority of the session debating each panelists position. The last third of the session will be opened up to audience questions.","PeriodicalId":201154,"journal":{"name":"CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"121 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design communication\",\"authors\":\"Scott Jenson, Harry Sadler, Charlie Hill, C. Disalvo\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1125451.1125465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Why is design communication so hard? We've all been in the situation: a room full of people, a usability test with clear problems and obvious outcomes. Yet the team can't agree on a design solution. Why does this happen? How can intelligent people disagree so strongly when looking at the same data?.This panel approaches a problem that has not been discussed much at CHI: the social interaction of the design process.Each of the four panelists, who have broad industry experience in consulting, in-house design centers, and academics, will each take a different position on this problem. Is this simply a matter of vocabulary, process, experience, or competence?.This panel will start off with brief statements by each panel member and then spend the majority of the session debating each panelists position. The last third of the session will be opened up to audience questions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"121 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

为什么设计沟通如此困难?我们都遇到过这样的情况:一屋子人,一个可用性测试有明确的问题和明显的结果。然而,团队无法就设计解决方案达成一致。为什么会发生这种情况?聪明的人在看同样的数据时怎么会有如此强烈的分歧呢?这个小组讨论了一个在CHI上没有讨论过的问题:设计过程中的社会互动。在咨询、内部设计中心和学术界拥有广泛行业经验的四位小组成员中的每一位都将在这个问题上采取不同的立场。这仅仅是词汇、过程、经验或能力的问题吗?这个小组将以每个小组成员的简短陈述开始,然后花大部分时间讨论每个小组成员的立场。最后三分之一的时间将供听众提问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design communication
Why is design communication so hard? We've all been in the situation: a room full of people, a usability test with clear problems and obvious outcomes. Yet the team can't agree on a design solution. Why does this happen? How can intelligent people disagree so strongly when looking at the same data?.This panel approaches a problem that has not been discussed much at CHI: the social interaction of the design process.Each of the four panelists, who have broad industry experience in consulting, in-house design centers, and academics, will each take a different position on this problem. Is this simply a matter of vocabulary, process, experience, or competence?.This panel will start off with brief statements by each panel member and then spend the majority of the session debating each panelists position. The last third of the session will be opened up to audience questions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信