{"title":"领导者、挑战者和利基参与者的股权与非股权合作策略","authors":"Wan-Chen Chen, B. Lin","doi":"10.1109/TEMSCON.2017.7998385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Competitive strategy should fit well with the focal firm's market position. This study extends this line of research to include a firm's technology positioning by considering market position at the industry level. Two inter-firm cooperative strategies considers equity-base (joint ventures) and non-equity alliances as effecting factors. The data file obtains that patent, inter-firm cooperative agreements, and financial data of technology firms from 1997 to 2008. This research demonstrates different strategic logic of industry leaders, challengers, and niche players. The empirical results show a nonlinear trend (an inverted U-shaped) to describe the relationship between technology position and non-equity alliances. As compared with joint ventures, challengers are less strategically active in non-equity alliances to compete against industry market leaders. However, niche players are more likely to engage in non-equity alliances than industry leaders when as compared with joint ventures. In terms of theoretical contribution, this study extends the concept of market competitive strategy from the product-market level to that of industry network level. It also broadens the scope of positioning strategy to include technology so that the abundant literature of the knowledge-based view of the firm can be integrated with the market positioning literature. Moreover, the empirical results will provide strategic implications and a systematic framework in managing partnership strategies for the business managers in the future.","PeriodicalId":193013,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equity versus non-equity partnership strategies for leaders, challengers, and niche players\",\"authors\":\"Wan-Chen Chen, B. Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEMSCON.2017.7998385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Competitive strategy should fit well with the focal firm's market position. This study extends this line of research to include a firm's technology positioning by considering market position at the industry level. Two inter-firm cooperative strategies considers equity-base (joint ventures) and non-equity alliances as effecting factors. The data file obtains that patent, inter-firm cooperative agreements, and financial data of technology firms from 1997 to 2008. This research demonstrates different strategic logic of industry leaders, challengers, and niche players. The empirical results show a nonlinear trend (an inverted U-shaped) to describe the relationship between technology position and non-equity alliances. As compared with joint ventures, challengers are less strategically active in non-equity alliances to compete against industry market leaders. However, niche players are more likely to engage in non-equity alliances than industry leaders when as compared with joint ventures. In terms of theoretical contribution, this study extends the concept of market competitive strategy from the product-market level to that of industry network level. It also broadens the scope of positioning strategy to include technology so that the abundant literature of the knowledge-based view of the firm can be integrated with the market positioning literature. Moreover, the empirical results will provide strategic implications and a systematic framework in managing partnership strategies for the business managers in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMSCON.2017.7998385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMSCON.2017.7998385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Equity versus non-equity partnership strategies for leaders, challengers, and niche players
Competitive strategy should fit well with the focal firm's market position. This study extends this line of research to include a firm's technology positioning by considering market position at the industry level. Two inter-firm cooperative strategies considers equity-base (joint ventures) and non-equity alliances as effecting factors. The data file obtains that patent, inter-firm cooperative agreements, and financial data of technology firms from 1997 to 2008. This research demonstrates different strategic logic of industry leaders, challengers, and niche players. The empirical results show a nonlinear trend (an inverted U-shaped) to describe the relationship between technology position and non-equity alliances. As compared with joint ventures, challengers are less strategically active in non-equity alliances to compete against industry market leaders. However, niche players are more likely to engage in non-equity alliances than industry leaders when as compared with joint ventures. In terms of theoretical contribution, this study extends the concept of market competitive strategy from the product-market level to that of industry network level. It also broadens the scope of positioning strategy to include technology so that the abundant literature of the knowledge-based view of the firm can be integrated with the market positioning literature. Moreover, the empirical results will provide strategic implications and a systematic framework in managing partnership strategies for the business managers in the future.