比较多受试者神经影像学数据的社区检测算法

J. deSouza, F. Taya, N. Thakor, Anastasios Bezerianos
{"title":"比较多受试者神经影像学数据的社区检测算法","authors":"J. deSouza, F. Taya, N. Thakor, Anastasios Bezerianos","doi":"10.1109/SITIS.2015.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well-known that the brain is a complex network\"\"brain areas dedicated to different functions. As such,\"\"consisting of\"\"it is natural to shift toward brain network from brain mapping for deeper understanding of brain functions. Although graph theoretical network metrics measuring global or local properties of network topology have been used to investigate the brain network, they do no provide any information about intermediate scale of the brain network, which is provided by the community structure analysis.\"\"In this paper, we propose a method to compare different community detection algorithms for multiple subjects data in terms of the agreement of a group-based community structure with individual community structures. As it is crucial to find a single group-based community structure for a group of subjects to discuss about brain areas and connections, a number of algorithms based on different approaches have been proposed. To show the feasibility of the method for comparing different algorithms, two community detection algorithms based on different approaches (\"virtual-typical-subject\" and \"group analysis\") were examined. The Normalized Mutual Information was computed to measure similarity between the group-based community structure and individual community structures derived from resting-state fMRI functional network, and was used for comparing the two algorithms. Our method demonstrated that the algorithm based on the group-analysis approach detected a group-based community structure with greater agreement with individual community structures.","PeriodicalId":128616,"journal":{"name":"2015 11th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Community Detection Algorithms on Neuroimaging Data from Multiple Subjects\",\"authors\":\"J. deSouza, F. Taya, N. Thakor, Anastasios Bezerianos\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SITIS.2015.124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well-known that the brain is a complex network\\\"\\\"brain areas dedicated to different functions. As such,\\\"\\\"consisting of\\\"\\\"it is natural to shift toward brain network from brain mapping for deeper understanding of brain functions. Although graph theoretical network metrics measuring global or local properties of network topology have been used to investigate the brain network, they do no provide any information about intermediate scale of the brain network, which is provided by the community structure analysis.\\\"\\\"In this paper, we propose a method to compare different community detection algorithms for multiple subjects data in terms of the agreement of a group-based community structure with individual community structures. As it is crucial to find a single group-based community structure for a group of subjects to discuss about brain areas and connections, a number of algorithms based on different approaches have been proposed. To show the feasibility of the method for comparing different algorithms, two community detection algorithms based on different approaches (\\\"virtual-typical-subject\\\" and \\\"group analysis\\\") were examined. The Normalized Mutual Information was computed to measure similarity between the group-based community structure and individual community structures derived from resting-state fMRI functional network, and was used for comparing the two algorithms. Our method demonstrated that the algorithm based on the group-analysis approach detected a group-based community structure with greater agreement with individual community structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 11th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 11th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SITIS.2015.124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 11th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SITIS.2015.124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

众所周知,大脑是一个复杂的网络,“大脑区域致力于不同的功能”。因此,为了更深入地了解大脑的功能,从“大脑绘图”转向“大脑网络”是很自然的。虽然测量网络拓扑的全局或局部属性的图论网络度量已被用于研究大脑网络,但它们没有提供任何关于大脑网络的中间尺度的信息,而这是由社区结构分析提供的。”“在本文中,我们提出了一种方法,根据基于群体的社区结构与个体社区结构的一致性来比较多主题数据的不同社区检测算法。由于为一组受试者找到一个单一的基于群体的社区结构来讨论大脑区域和连接是至关重要的,因此已经提出了许多基于不同方法的算法。为了证明该方法比较不同算法的可行性,研究了基于不同方法的两种社区检测算法(“虚拟典型-主体”和“群体分析”)。计算归一化互信息(Normalized Mutual Information)来衡量基于群体的社区结构与基于静息状态fMRI功能网络的个体社区结构之间的相似性,并用于比较两种算法。我们的方法表明,基于群体分析方法的算法检测到基于群体的社区结构与个体社区结构更一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Community Detection Algorithms on Neuroimaging Data from Multiple Subjects
It is well-known that the brain is a complex network""brain areas dedicated to different functions. As such,""consisting of""it is natural to shift toward brain network from brain mapping for deeper understanding of brain functions. Although graph theoretical network metrics measuring global or local properties of network topology have been used to investigate the brain network, they do no provide any information about intermediate scale of the brain network, which is provided by the community structure analysis.""In this paper, we propose a method to compare different community detection algorithms for multiple subjects data in terms of the agreement of a group-based community structure with individual community structures. As it is crucial to find a single group-based community structure for a group of subjects to discuss about brain areas and connections, a number of algorithms based on different approaches have been proposed. To show the feasibility of the method for comparing different algorithms, two community detection algorithms based on different approaches ("virtual-typical-subject" and "group analysis") were examined. The Normalized Mutual Information was computed to measure similarity between the group-based community structure and individual community structures derived from resting-state fMRI functional network, and was used for comparing the two algorithms. Our method demonstrated that the algorithm based on the group-analysis approach detected a group-based community structure with greater agreement with individual community structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信