反对欧盟法律在法院间对话中的首要地位

D. Pellegrini
{"title":"反对欧盟法律在法院间对话中的首要地位","authors":"D. Pellegrini","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-351-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The book challenges the ‘counter-limits’ (controlimiti) doctrine devised by the Italian Constitutional Court, in the light of the developments that have taken place within the EU framework over the last decades. The subject matter becomes the looking glass through which the author verifies ‘whether’ and ‘to what extent’ the judicial cooperation system based on the mechanism of preliminary ruling under article 267 TFEU is suitable to allow a reassessment of the ‘counter-limits review’ and, more generally, capable to ease the settlement of constitutional conflicts between national and EU legal orders. A thorough examination of the perspectives involved helps to prove the existence of a ‘judicial dialogue’ as to the question of constitutional limits to the primacy of EU law, and to deepen the decision-making process of EU Member States’ Constitutional Courts when fundamental constitutional principles are at stake. Leveraging on this background, some recent rulings are investigated to verify, on a case-law basis, the balancing of values carried out by national and EU Courts.","PeriodicalId":111468,"journal":{"name":"Premio Ricerca «Città di Firenze»","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"I controlimiti al primato del diritto dell'Unione europea nel dialogo tra le Corti\",\"authors\":\"D. Pellegrini\",\"doi\":\"10.36253/978-88-5518-351-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The book challenges the ‘counter-limits’ (controlimiti) doctrine devised by the Italian Constitutional Court, in the light of the developments that have taken place within the EU framework over the last decades. The subject matter becomes the looking glass through which the author verifies ‘whether’ and ‘to what extent’ the judicial cooperation system based on the mechanism of preliminary ruling under article 267 TFEU is suitable to allow a reassessment of the ‘counter-limits review’ and, more generally, capable to ease the settlement of constitutional conflicts between national and EU legal orders. A thorough examination of the perspectives involved helps to prove the existence of a ‘judicial dialogue’ as to the question of constitutional limits to the primacy of EU law, and to deepen the decision-making process of EU Member States’ Constitutional Courts when fundamental constitutional principles are at stake. Leveraging on this background, some recent rulings are investigated to verify, on a case-law basis, the balancing of values carried out by national and EU Courts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Premio Ricerca «Città di Firenze»\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Premio Ricerca «Città di Firenze»\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-351-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Premio Ricerca «Città di Firenze»","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-351-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于过去几十年来欧盟框架内发生的发展,这本书挑战了意大利宪法法院制定的“反限制”(控制限制)原则。这一主题成为了一面镜子,作者通过这面镜子验证了基于第267条TFEU规定的初步裁决机制的司法合作制度是否适合重新评估“反限制审查”,以及在多大程度上能够缓解国家和欧盟法律秩序之间的宪法冲突。对所涉及的观点进行彻底的检查有助于证明关于欧盟法律首要地位的宪法限制问题的“司法对话”的存在,并加深欧盟成员国宪法法院在基本宪法原则受到威胁时的决策过程。在这一背景下,对最近的一些裁决进行了调查,以在判例法的基础上核实国家和欧盟法院执行的价值平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
I controlimiti al primato del diritto dell'Unione europea nel dialogo tra le Corti
The book challenges the ‘counter-limits’ (controlimiti) doctrine devised by the Italian Constitutional Court, in the light of the developments that have taken place within the EU framework over the last decades. The subject matter becomes the looking glass through which the author verifies ‘whether’ and ‘to what extent’ the judicial cooperation system based on the mechanism of preliminary ruling under article 267 TFEU is suitable to allow a reassessment of the ‘counter-limits review’ and, more generally, capable to ease the settlement of constitutional conflicts between national and EU legal orders. A thorough examination of the perspectives involved helps to prove the existence of a ‘judicial dialogue’ as to the question of constitutional limits to the primacy of EU law, and to deepen the decision-making process of EU Member States’ Constitutional Courts when fundamental constitutional principles are at stake. Leveraging on this background, some recent rulings are investigated to verify, on a case-law basis, the balancing of values carried out by national and EU Courts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信