HPC应用的文件系统语义需求

Chen Wang, K. Mohror, M. Snir
{"title":"HPC应用的文件系统语义需求","authors":"Chen Wang, K. Mohror, M. Snir","doi":"10.1145/3431379.3460637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most widely-deployed parallel file systems (PFSs) implement POSIX semantics, which implies sequential consistency for reads and writes. Strict adherence to POSIX semantics is known to impede performance and thus several new PFSs with relaxed consistency semantics and better performance have been introduced. Such PFSs are useful provided that applications can run correctly on a PFS with weaker semantics. While it is widely assumed that HPC applications do not require strict POSIX semantics, to our knowledge there has not been systematic work to support this assumption. In this paper, we address this gap with a categorization of the consistency semantics guarantees of PFSs and develop an algorithm to determine the consistency semantics requirements of a variety of HPC applications. We captured the I/O activity of 17 representative HPC applications and benchmarks as they performed I/O through POSIX or I/O libraries and examined the metadata operations used and their file access patterns. From this analysis, we find that 16 of the 17 applications can utilize PFSs with weaker semantics.","PeriodicalId":343991,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing","volume":"91-93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"File System Semantics Requirements of HPC Applications\",\"authors\":\"Chen Wang, K. Mohror, M. Snir\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3431379.3460637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most widely-deployed parallel file systems (PFSs) implement POSIX semantics, which implies sequential consistency for reads and writes. Strict adherence to POSIX semantics is known to impede performance and thus several new PFSs with relaxed consistency semantics and better performance have been introduced. Such PFSs are useful provided that applications can run correctly on a PFS with weaker semantics. While it is widely assumed that HPC applications do not require strict POSIX semantics, to our knowledge there has not been systematic work to support this assumption. In this paper, we address this gap with a categorization of the consistency semantics guarantees of PFSs and develop an algorithm to determine the consistency semantics requirements of a variety of HPC applications. We captured the I/O activity of 17 representative HPC applications and benchmarks as they performed I/O through POSIX or I/O libraries and examined the metadata operations used and their file access patterns. From this analysis, we find that 16 of the 17 applications can utilize PFSs with weaker semantics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing\",\"volume\":\"91-93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3431379.3460637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3431379.3460637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

大多数广泛部署的并行文件系统(pfs)实现POSIX语义,这意味着读写的顺序一致性。严格遵守POSIX语义会影响性能,因此引入了几个具有宽松一致性语义和更好性能的新pfs。如果应用程序可以在语义较弱的PFS上正确运行,那么这样的PFS是有用的。虽然人们普遍认为HPC应用程序不需要严格的POSIX语义,但据我们所知,还没有系统的工作来支持这一假设。在本文中,我们通过对pfs的一致性语义保证进行分类来解决这一差距,并开发了一种算法来确定各种HPC应用程序的一致性语义需求。我们捕获了17个代表性HPC应用程序和基准测试的I/O活动,因为它们通过POSIX或I/O库执行I/O,并检查了所使用的元数据操作及其文件访问模式。从这个分析中,我们发现17个应用程序中有16个可以使用语义较弱的pfs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
File System Semantics Requirements of HPC Applications
Most widely-deployed parallel file systems (PFSs) implement POSIX semantics, which implies sequential consistency for reads and writes. Strict adherence to POSIX semantics is known to impede performance and thus several new PFSs with relaxed consistency semantics and better performance have been introduced. Such PFSs are useful provided that applications can run correctly on a PFS with weaker semantics. While it is widely assumed that HPC applications do not require strict POSIX semantics, to our knowledge there has not been systematic work to support this assumption. In this paper, we address this gap with a categorization of the consistency semantics guarantees of PFSs and develop an algorithm to determine the consistency semantics requirements of a variety of HPC applications. We captured the I/O activity of 17 representative HPC applications and benchmarks as they performed I/O through POSIX or I/O libraries and examined the metadata operations used and their file access patterns. From this analysis, we find that 16 of the 17 applications can utilize PFSs with weaker semantics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信