{"title":"人工智能与同意:女权主义反殖民主义批判","authors":"Joana Varon, P. Peña","doi":"10.14763/2021.4.1602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feminist theories have extensively debated consent in sexual and political contexts. But what does it mean to consent when we are talking about our data bodies feeding artificial intelligence (AI) systems? This article builds a feminist and anti-colonial critique about how an individualistic notion of consent is being used to legitimate practices of the so-called emerging Digital Welfare States, focused on digitalisation of anti-poverty programmes. The goal is to expose how the functional role of digital consent has been enabling data extractivist practices for control and exclusion, another manifestation of colonialism embedded in cutting-edge digital technology. Issue 4 This paper is part of Feminist data protection, a special issue of Internet Policy Review guest-edited by Jens T. Theilen, Andreas Baur, Felix Bieker, Regina Ammicht Quinn, Marit Hansen, and Gloria González Fuster.","PeriodicalId":219999,"journal":{"name":"Internet Policy Rev.","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence and consent: a feminist anti-colonial critique\",\"authors\":\"Joana Varon, P. Peña\",\"doi\":\"10.14763/2021.4.1602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Feminist theories have extensively debated consent in sexual and political contexts. But what does it mean to consent when we are talking about our data bodies feeding artificial intelligence (AI) systems? This article builds a feminist and anti-colonial critique about how an individualistic notion of consent is being used to legitimate practices of the so-called emerging Digital Welfare States, focused on digitalisation of anti-poverty programmes. The goal is to expose how the functional role of digital consent has been enabling data extractivist practices for control and exclusion, another manifestation of colonialism embedded in cutting-edge digital technology. Issue 4 This paper is part of Feminist data protection, a special issue of Internet Policy Review guest-edited by Jens T. Theilen, Andreas Baur, Felix Bieker, Regina Ammicht Quinn, Marit Hansen, and Gloria González Fuster.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet Policy Rev.\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet Policy Rev.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.4.1602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Policy Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.4.1602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
女权主义理论在性和政治语境中对同意进行了广泛的辩论。但是,当我们谈论我们的数据体为人工智能(AI)系统提供数据时,“同意”是什么意思?本文从女权主义和反殖民主义的角度,对所谓的新兴数字福利国家如何将个人主义的同意概念用于合法做法进行了批判,重点关注反贫困项目的数字化。目的是揭示数字同意的功能作用如何使数据提取者的控制和排斥实践成为可能,这是嵌入尖端数字技术的殖民主义的另一种表现。本文为《互联网政策评论》特刊《女权主义数据保护》的一部分,由Jens T. Theilen、Andreas Baur、Felix Bieker、Regina Ammicht Quinn、Marit Hansen和Gloria González Fuster特邀编辑。
Artificial intelligence and consent: a feminist anti-colonial critique
Feminist theories have extensively debated consent in sexual and political contexts. But what does it mean to consent when we are talking about our data bodies feeding artificial intelligence (AI) systems? This article builds a feminist and anti-colonial critique about how an individualistic notion of consent is being used to legitimate practices of the so-called emerging Digital Welfare States, focused on digitalisation of anti-poverty programmes. The goal is to expose how the functional role of digital consent has been enabling data extractivist practices for control and exclusion, another manifestation of colonialism embedded in cutting-edge digital technology. Issue 4 This paper is part of Feminist data protection, a special issue of Internet Policy Review guest-edited by Jens T. Theilen, Andreas Baur, Felix Bieker, Regina Ammicht Quinn, Marit Hansen, and Gloria González Fuster.