探测图像中流星的存在:新的收集和结果

R. M. Silva, Ana Carolina Lorena, Tiago A. Almeida
{"title":"探测图像中流星的存在:新的收集和结果","authors":"R. M. Silva, Ana Carolina Lorena, Tiago A. Almeida","doi":"10.5753/ENIAC.2018.4410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present a new public and real dataset of labeled images of meteors and non-meteors that we recently used in a machine learning competition. We also present a comprehensive performance evaluation of several established machine learning methods and compare the results with a stacking approach – one of the winning solutions of the competition. We compared the performance obtained by the methods in the traditional repeated five-fold cross-validation with the ones obtained using the training and test partitions used in the competition. A careful analysis of the results indicates that, in general, the stacking based approach obtained the best performances compared to the baselines. Moreover, we found evidence that the validation strategy used by the platform that hosted the competition can lead to results that do not sustain in a cross-validation setup, which is recommendable in real-world scenarios.\n","PeriodicalId":152292,"journal":{"name":"Anais do XV Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2018)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting the presence of meteors in images: new collection and results\",\"authors\":\"R. M. Silva, Ana Carolina Lorena, Tiago A. Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.5753/ENIAC.2018.4410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we present a new public and real dataset of labeled images of meteors and non-meteors that we recently used in a machine learning competition. We also present a comprehensive performance evaluation of several established machine learning methods and compare the results with a stacking approach – one of the winning solutions of the competition. We compared the performance obtained by the methods in the traditional repeated five-fold cross-validation with the ones obtained using the training and test partitions used in the competition. A careful analysis of the results indicates that, in general, the stacking based approach obtained the best performances compared to the baselines. Moreover, we found evidence that the validation strategy used by the platform that hosted the competition can lead to results that do not sustain in a cross-validation setup, which is recommendable in real-world scenarios.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":152292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anais do XV Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2018)\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anais do XV Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5753/ENIAC.2018.4410\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais do XV Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5753/ENIAC.2018.4410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一个新的公共和真实的数据集,其中包含了我们最近在机器学习竞赛中使用的标记流星和非流星图像。我们还对几种已建立的机器学习方法进行了全面的性能评估,并将结果与堆叠方法(竞赛中获胜的解决方案之一)进行了比较。我们将传统的重复五重交叉验证方法与比赛中使用的训练和测试分区方法获得的性能进行了比较。对结果的仔细分析表明,总的来说,与基线相比,基于叠加的方法获得了最好的性能。此外,我们发现有证据表明,主办比赛的平台使用的验证策略可能导致在交叉验证设置中无法维持的结果,这在现实场景中是值得推荐的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detecting the presence of meteors in images: new collection and results
In this paper, we present a new public and real dataset of labeled images of meteors and non-meteors that we recently used in a machine learning competition. We also present a comprehensive performance evaluation of several established machine learning methods and compare the results with a stacking approach – one of the winning solutions of the competition. We compared the performance obtained by the methods in the traditional repeated five-fold cross-validation with the ones obtained using the training and test partitions used in the competition. A careful analysis of the results indicates that, in general, the stacking based approach obtained the best performances compared to the baselines. Moreover, we found evidence that the validation strategy used by the platform that hosted the competition can lead to results that do not sustain in a cross-validation setup, which is recommendable in real-world scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信