氨基酸甘氨酸粉剂和碳酸氢钠喷射剂预防对牙釉质粘结强度的影响

Alessandra Schuttenberg Polanczyk, W. A. Vasconcellos, Warley Luciano Fonseca Tavares, Ricardo R Oliveira, H. H. Alvim
{"title":"氨基酸甘氨酸粉剂和碳酸氢钠喷射剂预防对牙釉质粘结强度的影响","authors":"Alessandra Schuttenberg Polanczyk, W. A. Vasconcellos, Warley Luciano Fonseca Tavares, Ricardo R Oliveira, H. H. Alvim","doi":"10.35699/2178-1990.2022.32997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To compare the influence of prophylaxis with sodium bicarbonate and amino acid glycine powder on the bond strength of bovine teeth enamel and on the properties of two adhesive systems.\nMethods: Thirty-six extracted bovine incisors were randomly divided into six groups (n = 6) according to the prophylactic treatment received: no prophylactic treatment (NT), sodium bicarbonate powder (SB), and glycine powder (GL). Each group was subdivided into 2 groups based on what adhesive systems were used: conventional system (A) and universal system (B). Composite resin was applied on the buccal surface of the teeth in a block measurement 8x8x6 mm. The specimens were cut to obtain beams measuring 1.0 x 1.0 mm and were subjected to microtensile bond strength tests. Results were compared using two-way ANOVA (p ≤ 0.05).\nResults: The GLA group obtained the highest bond strength value for the conventional adhesive (18.97 MPa), but the GLB group obtained a lower strength value than the SBB group (GLB: 21.05 MPa and SBB: 22.29 MPa) (p < 0.05).\nConclusions: Cleaning of the enamel surface increases the adhesive properties of restorative materials, and the bond strength was more effective in the group that received glycine prophylaxis and the conventional adhesive system.","PeriodicalId":402338,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos em Odontologia","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"influence of prophylaxis with amino acid glycine powder and sodium bicarbonate jet on the bond strength of dental enamel\",\"authors\":\"Alessandra Schuttenberg Polanczyk, W. A. Vasconcellos, Warley Luciano Fonseca Tavares, Ricardo R Oliveira, H. H. Alvim\",\"doi\":\"10.35699/2178-1990.2022.32997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To compare the influence of prophylaxis with sodium bicarbonate and amino acid glycine powder on the bond strength of bovine teeth enamel and on the properties of two adhesive systems.\\nMethods: Thirty-six extracted bovine incisors were randomly divided into six groups (n = 6) according to the prophylactic treatment received: no prophylactic treatment (NT), sodium bicarbonate powder (SB), and glycine powder (GL). Each group was subdivided into 2 groups based on what adhesive systems were used: conventional system (A) and universal system (B). Composite resin was applied on the buccal surface of the teeth in a block measurement 8x8x6 mm. The specimens were cut to obtain beams measuring 1.0 x 1.0 mm and were subjected to microtensile bond strength tests. Results were compared using two-way ANOVA (p ≤ 0.05).\\nResults: The GLA group obtained the highest bond strength value for the conventional adhesive (18.97 MPa), but the GLB group obtained a lower strength value than the SBB group (GLB: 21.05 MPa and SBB: 22.29 MPa) (p < 0.05).\\nConclusions: Cleaning of the enamel surface increases the adhesive properties of restorative materials, and the bond strength was more effective in the group that received glycine prophylaxis and the conventional adhesive system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos em Odontologia\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos em Odontologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35699/2178-1990.2022.32997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos em Odontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35699/2178-1990.2022.32997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较碳酸氢钠和氨基酸甘氨酸粉预防对牛牙釉质粘结强度和两种粘结体系性能的影响。方法:将36颗拔牙的牛切牙按预防处理方式随机分为无预防处理组(NT)、碳酸氢钠粉(SB)和甘氨酸粉(GL) 6组(n = 6)。根据粘接系统的不同,每组又分为常规系统(A)和通用系统(B)两组。将复合树脂以8 × 8 × 6 mm的块状涂于牙颊面。试件被切割成尺寸为1.0 x 1.0 mm的梁,并进行微拉伸粘结强度测试。结果比较采用双因素方差分析(p≤0.05)。结果:GLA组与常规粘接剂的结合强度值最高(18.97 MPa), GLB组低于SBB组(21.05 MPa和22.29 MPa) (p < 0.05)。结论:牙釉质表面清洁可提高修复材料的粘接性能,甘氨酸预防组和常规粘接组的粘接强度更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
influence of prophylaxis with amino acid glycine powder and sodium bicarbonate jet on the bond strength of dental enamel
Aim: To compare the influence of prophylaxis with sodium bicarbonate and amino acid glycine powder on the bond strength of bovine teeth enamel and on the properties of two adhesive systems. Methods: Thirty-six extracted bovine incisors were randomly divided into six groups (n = 6) according to the prophylactic treatment received: no prophylactic treatment (NT), sodium bicarbonate powder (SB), and glycine powder (GL). Each group was subdivided into 2 groups based on what adhesive systems were used: conventional system (A) and universal system (B). Composite resin was applied on the buccal surface of the teeth in a block measurement 8x8x6 mm. The specimens were cut to obtain beams measuring 1.0 x 1.0 mm and were subjected to microtensile bond strength tests. Results were compared using two-way ANOVA (p ≤ 0.05). Results: The GLA group obtained the highest bond strength value for the conventional adhesive (18.97 MPa), but the GLB group obtained a lower strength value than the SBB group (GLB: 21.05 MPa and SBB: 22.29 MPa) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Cleaning of the enamel surface increases the adhesive properties of restorative materials, and the bond strength was more effective in the group that received glycine prophylaxis and the conventional adhesive system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信