1985年至2018年沙特在人才、创造力和卓越领域的学术生产力

Mohaamad.H.M.Al-Sulimani
{"title":"1985年至2018年沙特在人才、创造力和卓越领域的学术生产力","authors":"Mohaamad.H.M.Al-Sulimani","doi":"10.20428/ijtd.v11i1.1670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to identify the main characteristics of research studies and theses carried out in the areas of talent, creativity and excellence in Saudi society. The content analysis method was used with 409 studies. The findings showed that there was a growth of the studies, of which 82.63% appeared between 2000 -2018. More than 66% of the studies were master and Ph.D. theses, and females took part in 36.68% of the studies. Regarding researchers' disciplines, 29.59% belonged to psychology, 27.39% to curriculum, and 22.99%to special education. 66.75% of published work was conducted by universities, while 15.40% by Journals, and 9.79% by conferences and symposiums. With regard to areas, 47.43% of the studies used giftedness terms, 44.99% used creativity terms, 6.11% used academic excellence terms, while 1.47% used mental excellence terms. 38.63% of the studies dealt with characteristics, while 23.69% focused on programs, 9.53% on measurement and evaluation, and 8.31% on difficulties and problems. Regarding research methods, 59.91% used the descriptive method, 24.45% experimental, while 15.64% were theoretical reviews. Most of the sample members were students. 32.77% of the studies used measures and tests, while 24.45% used questionnaires and checklists, and 24.45% used programs. The study concluded with some recommendations.Keywords: Saudi productivity about talent, creativity, excellence.","PeriodicalId":413991,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal for Talent Development","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Saudi Scholarly Productivity in the Areas of Talent, Creativity and Excellence between 1985 – 2018\",\"authors\":\"Mohaamad.H.M.Al-Sulimani\",\"doi\":\"10.20428/ijtd.v11i1.1670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to identify the main characteristics of research studies and theses carried out in the areas of talent, creativity and excellence in Saudi society. The content analysis method was used with 409 studies. The findings showed that there was a growth of the studies, of which 82.63% appeared between 2000 -2018. More than 66% of the studies were master and Ph.D. theses, and females took part in 36.68% of the studies. Regarding researchers' disciplines, 29.59% belonged to psychology, 27.39% to curriculum, and 22.99%to special education. 66.75% of published work was conducted by universities, while 15.40% by Journals, and 9.79% by conferences and symposiums. With regard to areas, 47.43% of the studies used giftedness terms, 44.99% used creativity terms, 6.11% used academic excellence terms, while 1.47% used mental excellence terms. 38.63% of the studies dealt with characteristics, while 23.69% focused on programs, 9.53% on measurement and evaluation, and 8.31% on difficulties and problems. Regarding research methods, 59.91% used the descriptive method, 24.45% experimental, while 15.64% were theoretical reviews. Most of the sample members were students. 32.77% of the studies used measures and tests, while 24.45% used questionnaires and checklists, and 24.45% used programs. The study concluded with some recommendations.Keywords: Saudi productivity about talent, creativity, excellence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal for Talent Development\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal for Talent Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20428/ijtd.v11i1.1670\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal for Talent Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20428/ijtd.v11i1.1670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定在沙特社会人才、创造力和卓越领域开展的研究和论文的主要特征。采用内容分析法,共纳入409项研究。研究结果显示,此类研究有所增加,其中82.63%出现在2000年至2018年之间。超过66%的研究是硕士和博士论文,女性参与的研究占36.68%。从研究人员的学科来看,心理学占29.59%,课程占27.39%,特殊教育占22.99%。66.75%的已发表论文由大学完成,15.40%由期刊完成,9.79%由会议和专题讨论会完成。就领域而言,47.43%的研究使用了天赋术语,44.99%使用了创造力术语,6.11%使用了学术卓越术语,而1.47%使用了精神卓越术语。38.63%的研究涉及特征,23.69%的研究关注程序,9.53%的研究关注测量和评价,8.31%的研究关注困难和问题。在研究方法上,59.91%采用描述法,24.45%采用实验法,15.64%采用理论综述法。大多数样本成员都是学生。32.77%的研究采用测量和测试,24.45%的研究采用问卷调查和检查表,24.45%的研究采用程序。这项研究最后提出了一些建议。关键词:沙特人才生产力,创造力,卓越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Saudi Scholarly Productivity in the Areas of Talent, Creativity and Excellence between 1985 – 2018
This study aimed to identify the main characteristics of research studies and theses carried out in the areas of talent, creativity and excellence in Saudi society. The content analysis method was used with 409 studies. The findings showed that there was a growth of the studies, of which 82.63% appeared between 2000 -2018. More than 66% of the studies were master and Ph.D. theses, and females took part in 36.68% of the studies. Regarding researchers' disciplines, 29.59% belonged to psychology, 27.39% to curriculum, and 22.99%to special education. 66.75% of published work was conducted by universities, while 15.40% by Journals, and 9.79% by conferences and symposiums. With regard to areas, 47.43% of the studies used giftedness terms, 44.99% used creativity terms, 6.11% used academic excellence terms, while 1.47% used mental excellence terms. 38.63% of the studies dealt with characteristics, while 23.69% focused on programs, 9.53% on measurement and evaluation, and 8.31% on difficulties and problems. Regarding research methods, 59.91% used the descriptive method, 24.45% experimental, while 15.64% were theoretical reviews. Most of the sample members were students. 32.77% of the studies used measures and tests, while 24.45% used questionnaires and checklists, and 24.45% used programs. The study concluded with some recommendations.Keywords: Saudi productivity about talent, creativity, excellence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信