{"title":"形态标本在甲螨(蜱螨亚纲:甲螨科)修订研究中的重要性","authors":"F. Bernini, M. Migliorini","doi":"10.2300/ACARI.25.SUPPL_27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taxonomic revisions should comply with certain best practices, one of which is to study topotypic specimens if type specimens are not available. We discuss the example of an oribatid mite, the classical species Carabodes labyrinthicus (Michael 1879), in which topotypes are critical to questions of identity, synonymy, and species status.","PeriodicalId":171325,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Acarological Society of Japan","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The importance of topotypic specimens in revisionary studies of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida)\",\"authors\":\"F. Bernini, M. Migliorini\",\"doi\":\"10.2300/ACARI.25.SUPPL_27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Taxonomic revisions should comply with certain best practices, one of which is to study topotypic specimens if type specimens are not available. We discuss the example of an oribatid mite, the classical species Carabodes labyrinthicus (Michael 1879), in which topotypes are critical to questions of identity, synonymy, and species status.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Acarological Society of Japan\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Acarological Society of Japan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2300/ACARI.25.SUPPL_27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Acarological Society of Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2300/ACARI.25.SUPPL_27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The importance of topotypic specimens in revisionary studies of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida)
Taxonomic revisions should comply with certain best practices, one of which is to study topotypic specimens if type specimens are not available. We discuss the example of an oribatid mite, the classical species Carabodes labyrinthicus (Michael 1879), in which topotypes are critical to questions of identity, synonymy, and species status.