股权从股权到奖金分配

A. Arbaney
{"title":"股权从股权到奖金分配","authors":"A. Arbaney","doi":"10.1017/S0020269X0000997X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many years ago the question of equitable distributions of surplus would have attracted much discussion. The subject received a full philosophical, financial and mathematical treatment, with the aim of getting it just right. As time passed this subject became less precise. Wider variations in investment conditions and different investment strategies meant that the constraints of the usual bonus methods could only achieve rough justice. Premium rates and valuation bases remained fairly static (often quite rightly so), and the declared results seemed slightly arbitrary and perhaps a little conservative. The work of the traditional actuary seemed a little ‘stodgy’ and the challenge and activity turned to the field of unit linking. Today the picture is different. Just as the introduction of banks to the personal mortgage market seems to have improved the service from Building Societies, so the advent of unit-linking seems to have spurred on the traditional actuary. The expectations of what can be achieved have increased. So, over the period that the methods for valuation, pricing and projection for unit linked contracts have achieved some measure of standardization, the traditional actuary has been pushed more into the role of the pioneer.","PeriodicalId":419781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Staple Inn Actuarial Society","volume":"2629 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EQUITY FROM EQUITIES IN BONUS DISTRIBUTIONS\",\"authors\":\"A. Arbaney\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0020269X0000997X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many years ago the question of equitable distributions of surplus would have attracted much discussion. The subject received a full philosophical, financial and mathematical treatment, with the aim of getting it just right. As time passed this subject became less precise. Wider variations in investment conditions and different investment strategies meant that the constraints of the usual bonus methods could only achieve rough justice. Premium rates and valuation bases remained fairly static (often quite rightly so), and the declared results seemed slightly arbitrary and perhaps a little conservative. The work of the traditional actuary seemed a little ‘stodgy’ and the challenge and activity turned to the field of unit linking. Today the picture is different. Just as the introduction of banks to the personal mortgage market seems to have improved the service from Building Societies, so the advent of unit-linking seems to have spurred on the traditional actuary. The expectations of what can be achieved have increased. So, over the period that the methods for valuation, pricing and projection for unit linked contracts have achieved some measure of standardization, the traditional actuary has been pushed more into the role of the pioneer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":419781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Staple Inn Actuarial Society\",\"volume\":\"2629 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Staple Inn Actuarial Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020269X0000997X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Staple Inn Actuarial Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020269X0000997X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多年前,公平分配盈余的问题会引起很多讨论。这个主题接受了全面的哲学、金融和数学处理,目的是让它恰到好处。随着时间的流逝,这个问题变得不那么精确了。投资条件的更大差异和不同的投资策略意味着,通常的奖金方法的约束只能实现粗略的公正。溢价率和估值基础仍然相当稳定(通常情况下是相当正确的),公布的结果似乎有些武断,或许还有点保守。传统精算师的工作似乎有点“乏味”,挑战和活动转向了单元连接领域。今天的情况不同了。正如银行进入个人抵押贷款市场似乎改善了建房互助会的服务一样,单位挂钩的出现似乎刺激了传统精算师的发展。人们对所能取得的成就的期望有所提高。因此,在单位关联合同的估值、定价和预测方法实现一定程度标准化的过程中,传统精算师更多地扮演了先锋的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EQUITY FROM EQUITIES IN BONUS DISTRIBUTIONS
Many years ago the question of equitable distributions of surplus would have attracted much discussion. The subject received a full philosophical, financial and mathematical treatment, with the aim of getting it just right. As time passed this subject became less precise. Wider variations in investment conditions and different investment strategies meant that the constraints of the usual bonus methods could only achieve rough justice. Premium rates and valuation bases remained fairly static (often quite rightly so), and the declared results seemed slightly arbitrary and perhaps a little conservative. The work of the traditional actuary seemed a little ‘stodgy’ and the challenge and activity turned to the field of unit linking. Today the picture is different. Just as the introduction of banks to the personal mortgage market seems to have improved the service from Building Societies, so the advent of unit-linking seems to have spurred on the traditional actuary. The expectations of what can be achieved have increased. So, over the period that the methods for valuation, pricing and projection for unit linked contracts have achieved some measure of standardization, the traditional actuary has been pushed more into the role of the pioneer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信