{"title":"Creatio ex Creatione a Natura Amoris","authors":"B. Orr","doi":"10.1163/27725472-09304003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Creatio ex nihilo is the dominant creation theory in the Christian tradition. Relational theologian Thomas Jay Oord proposes an alternative creation theory, in which God everlastingly creates from what he previously created. Key reasons why Oord argues creatio ex nihilo should be rejected are that it has Gnostic roots, is not explicitly taught in Scripture, and is illogical. This article critically assesses Oord’s arguments against creatio ex nihilo, contending that his conclusions are misguided due to a Biblicist tendency in his reading of the text and the inaccurate definition of creatio ex nihilo he argues against. With the biblical and historical data, a definition of creatio ex nihilo representative of the Christian tradition is articulated. This essay then demonstrates how creatio ex nihilo is superior to Oord’s alternative theory.","PeriodicalId":355176,"journal":{"name":"Evangelical Quarterly","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evangelical Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725472-09304003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
从无开始创造是基督教传统中占主导地位的创造论。关系神学家托马斯·杰伊·奥德(Thomas Jay Oord)提出了另一种创造理论,即上帝从他先前创造的东西中永远地创造。奥德认为从无到有的创造应该被拒绝的主要原因是,它有诺斯替主义的根源,在圣经中没有明确的教导,而且是不合逻辑的。这篇文章批判性地评价了奥德反对“无创造论”的论点,认为他的结论是被误导的,因为他在阅读文本时有一种圣经主义倾向,而且他所反对的“无创造论”的定义不准确。结合《圣经》和历史资料,阐述了一个代表基督教传统的“从无开始”的定义。然后,本文论证了从无开始的创造如何优于奥德的替代理论。
Creatio ex nihilo is the dominant creation theory in the Christian tradition. Relational theologian Thomas Jay Oord proposes an alternative creation theory, in which God everlastingly creates from what he previously created. Key reasons why Oord argues creatio ex nihilo should be rejected are that it has Gnostic roots, is not explicitly taught in Scripture, and is illogical. This article critically assesses Oord’s arguments against creatio ex nihilo, contending that his conclusions are misguided due to a Biblicist tendency in his reading of the text and the inaccurate definition of creatio ex nihilo he argues against. With the biblical and historical data, a definition of creatio ex nihilo representative of the Christian tradition is articulated. This essay then demonstrates how creatio ex nihilo is superior to Oord’s alternative theory.