走向重建的解构:对转型中解构必要性的建构-发展思考。

Samuel B. Albertson
{"title":"走向重建的解构:对转型中解构必要性的建构-发展思考。","authors":"Samuel B. Albertson","doi":"10.1037/H0101083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The intention of this viewpoint paper is to explore the terrain of developmental transitions, more specifically the necessity of the process of questioning or, deconstructing one’s whole frame of knowing before a new frame of knowing can emerge a “reconstruction”. Leaning on constructive-developmental theory, this paper seeks to define the deconstructive pattern that emerges and reemerges during developmental or “stage” transition, and shows how it is necessary to incorporate this deconstructed “stage” into a more complex system of knowing or “stage”. The second portion of the paper then outlines a current example of how an epistemology can have roots in logical coherency, then become disruptive or deconstructive, then re-constructive, in the postmodern theory of social science methods commonly referred to as Critical Discursive Psychology (CDP). This theory is argued to be emerging as fifth order as defined by Robert Kegan (2010) in that it is reconstructive and not just deconstructive or, antimodernist as seen in not denying, but utilizing process, the disunified self, subjectivity, and theory reproduction, as it is made clear in the argumentation of the second portion of the paper. The paper concludes in a clear affirmation of the process of differentiation and reintegration as integral for stage transition and growth not just in individual human development, but also in the social sciences.","PeriodicalId":314223,"journal":{"name":"The Behavioral Development Bulletin","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deconstruction toward reconstruction: A constructive-developmental consideration of deconstructive necessities in transitions.\",\"authors\":\"Samuel B. Albertson\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/H0101083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The intention of this viewpoint paper is to explore the terrain of developmental transitions, more specifically the necessity of the process of questioning or, deconstructing one’s whole frame of knowing before a new frame of knowing can emerge a “reconstruction”. Leaning on constructive-developmental theory, this paper seeks to define the deconstructive pattern that emerges and reemerges during developmental or “stage” transition, and shows how it is necessary to incorporate this deconstructed “stage” into a more complex system of knowing or “stage”. The second portion of the paper then outlines a current example of how an epistemology can have roots in logical coherency, then become disruptive or deconstructive, then re-constructive, in the postmodern theory of social science methods commonly referred to as Critical Discursive Psychology (CDP). This theory is argued to be emerging as fifth order as defined by Robert Kegan (2010) in that it is reconstructive and not just deconstructive or, antimodernist as seen in not denying, but utilizing process, the disunified self, subjectivity, and theory reproduction, as it is made clear in the argumentation of the second portion of the paper. The paper concludes in a clear affirmation of the process of differentiation and reintegration as integral for stage transition and growth not just in individual human development, but also in the social sciences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Behavioral Development Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Behavioral Development Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0101083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Behavioral Development Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/H0101083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这篇观点论文的目的是探索发展转型的地形,更具体地说,是质疑过程的必要性,在一个新的认识框架出现之前,解构一个人的整个认识框架。借助建构-发展理论,本文试图定义在发展或“阶段”过渡中出现和重新出现的解构模式,并表明如何有必要将这种解构的“阶段”纳入更复杂的认识或“阶段”系统。然后,本文的第二部分概述了一个当前的例子,说明认识论如何在逻辑一致性中扎根,然后在通常被称为批判话语心理学(CDP)的后现代社会科学方法理论中变得破坏性或解构性,然后重建。正如Robert Kegan(2010)所定义的那样,这一理论被认为是第五阶的,因为它是重构的,而不仅仅是解构的,或者是反现代主义的,因为它不否认,而是利用过程,不统一的自我,主观性和理论再生产,正如在论文第二部分的论证中明确指出的那样。本文的结论明确地肯定了分化和重新融合的过程不仅在个人发展中,而且在社会科学中都是阶段过渡和成长的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deconstruction toward reconstruction: A constructive-developmental consideration of deconstructive necessities in transitions.
The intention of this viewpoint paper is to explore the terrain of developmental transitions, more specifically the necessity of the process of questioning or, deconstructing one’s whole frame of knowing before a new frame of knowing can emerge a “reconstruction”. Leaning on constructive-developmental theory, this paper seeks to define the deconstructive pattern that emerges and reemerges during developmental or “stage” transition, and shows how it is necessary to incorporate this deconstructed “stage” into a more complex system of knowing or “stage”. The second portion of the paper then outlines a current example of how an epistemology can have roots in logical coherency, then become disruptive or deconstructive, then re-constructive, in the postmodern theory of social science methods commonly referred to as Critical Discursive Psychology (CDP). This theory is argued to be emerging as fifth order as defined by Robert Kegan (2010) in that it is reconstructive and not just deconstructive or, antimodernist as seen in not denying, but utilizing process, the disunified self, subjectivity, and theory reproduction, as it is made clear in the argumentation of the second portion of the paper. The paper concludes in a clear affirmation of the process of differentiation and reintegration as integral for stage transition and growth not just in individual human development, but also in the social sciences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信