在测试验证中检查卡尺,弯曲和纸张拉伸刚度之间的相互关系

December 2008 Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI:10.32964/tj7.12.17
C. Carson, R. Popil
{"title":"在测试验证中检查卡尺,弯曲和纸张拉伸刚度之间的相互关系","authors":"C. Carson, R. Popil","doi":"10.32964/tj7.12.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Researchers made a series of physical property measurements for various types of common paper and laminate products to obtain a wide range of basis weight, caliper, and other values. Several different techniques were used to obtain the same property results to examine differences. Specifically, tensile stiffness, bending stiffness, in-plane moduli, and soft- and hard-platen caliper were examined critically and shown to be interrelated through simple calculations. Ultrasonically measured stiffnesses and moduli were also used to verify the relative values of the measured properties. Comparison of measured to calculated bending stiffness is shown to be a method for validating measurement methods for lightweight low-stiffness samples in terms of selecting a proper test\nspan and deflection when results from a chosen technique become questionable.\"","PeriodicalId":308567,"journal":{"name":"December 2008","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining interrelationships between caliper, bending, and tensile stiffness of paper in testing validation\",\"authors\":\"C. Carson, R. Popil\",\"doi\":\"10.32964/tj7.12.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"Researchers made a series of physical property measurements for various types of common paper and laminate products to obtain a wide range of basis weight, caliper, and other values. Several different techniques were used to obtain the same property results to examine differences. Specifically, tensile stiffness, bending stiffness, in-plane moduli, and soft- and hard-platen caliper were examined critically and shown to be interrelated through simple calculations. Ultrasonically measured stiffnesses and moduli were also used to verify the relative values of the measured properties. Comparison of measured to calculated bending stiffness is shown to be a method for validating measurement methods for lightweight low-stiffness samples in terms of selecting a proper test\\nspan and deflection when results from a chosen technique become questionable.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":308567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"December 2008\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"December 2008\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32964/tj7.12.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"December 2008","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32964/tj7.12.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

研究人员对各种类型的普通纸张和层压板产品进行了一系列的物理性能测量,以获得广泛的基础重量、卡尺和其他值。使用了几种不同的技术来获得相同的属性结果,以检查差异。具体来说,拉伸刚度、弯曲刚度、平面内模量和软硬板卡尺进行了严格的检查,并通过简单的计算表明它们是相互关联的。超声测量的刚度和模量也用于验证测量性能的相对值。在选择适当的测试跨度和挠度时,当所选技术的结果有问题时,将测量值与计算值进行比较是验证轻质低刚度样品测量方法的一种方法。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining interrelationships between caliper, bending, and tensile stiffness of paper in testing validation
"Researchers made a series of physical property measurements for various types of common paper and laminate products to obtain a wide range of basis weight, caliper, and other values. Several different techniques were used to obtain the same property results to examine differences. Specifically, tensile stiffness, bending stiffness, in-plane moduli, and soft- and hard-platen caliper were examined critically and shown to be interrelated through simple calculations. Ultrasonically measured stiffnesses and moduli were also used to verify the relative values of the measured properties. Comparison of measured to calculated bending stiffness is shown to be a method for validating measurement methods for lightweight low-stiffness samples in terms of selecting a proper test span and deflection when results from a chosen technique become questionable."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信