作为解释性实践的学习分析:将韦斯特曼应用于教育干预

Michael Atkisson, David A. Wiley
{"title":"作为解释性实践的学习分析:将韦斯特曼应用于教育干预","authors":"Michael Atkisson, David A. Wiley","doi":"10.1145/2090116.2090133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Westerman's [12] disruptive article, \"Quantitative research as an interpretive enterprise: The mostly unacknowledged role of interpretation in research efforts and suggestions for explicitly interpretive quantitative investigations,\" he invited qualitative researchers in psychology to adopt quantitative methods into interpretive inquiry, given that they were as capable as qualitative measures in producing meaning-laden results. The objective of this article is to identify Westerman's [12] key arguments and apply them to the practice of Learning Analytics in educational interventions. The primary implication for Learning Analytics practitioners is the need to interpret quantitative analysis procedures at every phase from philosophy to conclusions. Furthermore, Learning Analytics practitioners and consumers must critically examine any assumption that suggests quantitative methodologies in Learning Analytics are inherently objective or that Learning Analytics algorithms may replace judgment rather than aid it. Lastly we propose a method for making observational data in virtual environments concrete through nested models.","PeriodicalId":150927,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning analytics as interpretive practice: applying Westerman to educational intervention\",\"authors\":\"Michael Atkisson, David A. Wiley\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2090116.2090133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Westerman's [12] disruptive article, \\\"Quantitative research as an interpretive enterprise: The mostly unacknowledged role of interpretation in research efforts and suggestions for explicitly interpretive quantitative investigations,\\\" he invited qualitative researchers in psychology to adopt quantitative methods into interpretive inquiry, given that they were as capable as qualitative measures in producing meaning-laden results. The objective of this article is to identify Westerman's [12] key arguments and apply them to the practice of Learning Analytics in educational interventions. The primary implication for Learning Analytics practitioners is the need to interpret quantitative analysis procedures at every phase from philosophy to conclusions. Furthermore, Learning Analytics practitioners and consumers must critically examine any assumption that suggests quantitative methodologies in Learning Analytics are inherently objective or that Learning Analytics algorithms may replace judgment rather than aid it. Lastly we propose a method for making observational data in virtual environments concrete through nested models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2090116.2090133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2090116.2090133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

在韦斯特曼[12]那篇颠覆性的文章《作为解释性事业的定量研究:解释在研究努力和明确解释性定量调查的建议中最未被承认的作用》中,他邀请心理学的定性研究人员将定量方法采用到解释性调查中,因为它们在产生充满意义的结果方面与定性方法一样有能力。本文的目的是识别韦斯特曼[12]的关键论点,并将其应用于学习分析在教育干预中的实践。学习分析实践者的主要含义是需要在从哲学到结论的每个阶段解释定量分析程序。此外,学习分析的实践者和消费者必须严格检查任何认为学习分析中的定量方法本质上是客观的假设,或者学习分析算法可能取代而不是帮助判断。最后,我们提出了一种通过嵌套模型将虚拟环境中的观测数据具体化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning analytics as interpretive practice: applying Westerman to educational intervention
In Westerman's [12] disruptive article, "Quantitative research as an interpretive enterprise: The mostly unacknowledged role of interpretation in research efforts and suggestions for explicitly interpretive quantitative investigations," he invited qualitative researchers in psychology to adopt quantitative methods into interpretive inquiry, given that they were as capable as qualitative measures in producing meaning-laden results. The objective of this article is to identify Westerman's [12] key arguments and apply them to the practice of Learning Analytics in educational interventions. The primary implication for Learning Analytics practitioners is the need to interpret quantitative analysis procedures at every phase from philosophy to conclusions. Furthermore, Learning Analytics practitioners and consumers must critically examine any assumption that suggests quantitative methodologies in Learning Analytics are inherently objective or that Learning Analytics algorithms may replace judgment rather than aid it. Lastly we propose a method for making observational data in virtual environments concrete through nested models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信