基于非弹性动力分析的设备抗震设计方法评价结果

I. Tamura, A. Okubo, Yusuke Minakawa, T. Iijima, Y. Namita, Nobuyoshi Goshima, Masanori Amino, Y. Okuda, Shunji Okuma
{"title":"基于非弹性动力分析的设备抗震设计方法评价结果","authors":"I. Tamura, A. Okubo, Yusuke Minakawa, T. Iijima, Y. Namita, Nobuyoshi Goshima, Masanori Amino, Y. Okuda, Shunji Okuma","doi":"10.1115/pvp2019-93532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Securing adequate seismic safety margins has been important in safety reviews regarding the seismic design of equipment and piping systems in nuclear power plants, and there exists an increasing need for a more exact method for evaluating these margins. To this end, it is reasonable to take into account the reduction of seismic responses resulting from inelastic deformation. The authors studied this approach utilizing an elastic allowable limit in existing standard. The applicability of the proposed evaluation method was investigated by comparison with the conventional evaluation method. The proposed method consists of an inelastic dynamic analysis and an elastic-static analysis. The elastic-static analysis uses a load obtained from the inelastic dynamic analysis. For the investigation, the result obtained from the proposed method was compared with that obtained from the conventional elastic analysis to quantify the reduction in responses leading to seismic safety margins. For the comparison, the authors constructed three models that simulate a cantilever-type beam, four-legged tank, and core shroud and applied them to the analysis herein, and the applicability of our method was discussed for these models. In this paper, we present three topics. First, we present a scheme for developing the design approach of using inelastic analysis. Second, we report a sensitivity study of model parameters, such as yielding stress and second stiffness, done by analyzing the cantilever-type beam for the proposed method. Finally, we report the application of the method to the four-legged tank and core shroud.","PeriodicalId":180537,"journal":{"name":"Volume 8: Seismic Engineering","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluated Results of Seismic Design Approach Using Inelastic Dynamic Analysis for Equipment\",\"authors\":\"I. Tamura, A. Okubo, Yusuke Minakawa, T. Iijima, Y. Namita, Nobuyoshi Goshima, Masanori Amino, Y. Okuda, Shunji Okuma\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/pvp2019-93532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Securing adequate seismic safety margins has been important in safety reviews regarding the seismic design of equipment and piping systems in nuclear power plants, and there exists an increasing need for a more exact method for evaluating these margins. To this end, it is reasonable to take into account the reduction of seismic responses resulting from inelastic deformation. The authors studied this approach utilizing an elastic allowable limit in existing standard. The applicability of the proposed evaluation method was investigated by comparison with the conventional evaluation method. The proposed method consists of an inelastic dynamic analysis and an elastic-static analysis. The elastic-static analysis uses a load obtained from the inelastic dynamic analysis. For the investigation, the result obtained from the proposed method was compared with that obtained from the conventional elastic analysis to quantify the reduction in responses leading to seismic safety margins. For the comparison, the authors constructed three models that simulate a cantilever-type beam, four-legged tank, and core shroud and applied them to the analysis herein, and the applicability of our method was discussed for these models. In this paper, we present three topics. First, we present a scheme for developing the design approach of using inelastic analysis. Second, we report a sensitivity study of model parameters, such as yielding stress and second stiffness, done by analyzing the cantilever-type beam for the proposed method. Finally, we report the application of the method to the four-legged tank and core shroud.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 8: Seismic Engineering\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 8: Seismic Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93532\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 8: Seismic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在核电站设备和管道系统的抗震设计安全审查中,确保足够的地震安全裕度是很重要的,而且越来越需要一种更精确的方法来评估这些裕度。为此,考虑减少非弹性变形引起的地震反应是合理的。本文利用现有标准中的弹性允许极限对该方法进行了研究。通过与传统评价方法的比较,研究了所提评价方法的适用性。该方法由非弹性动力分析和弹性静力分析两部分组成。弹性静力分析使用非弹性动力分析得到的载荷。在研究中,将该方法的结果与传统弹性分析的结果进行了比较,以量化导致地震安全裕度的响应减小。为了进行比较,作者分别建立了悬臂梁、四足罐和核心罩的三个模型,并将其应用于本文的分析,讨论了本文方法对这些模型的适用性。在本文中,我们提出了三个主题。首先,我们提出了一种利用非弹性分析开发设计方法的方案。其次,我们报告了模型参数的敏感性研究,如屈服应力和第二次刚度,通过分析所提出的方法的悬臂式梁。最后,我们报告了该方法在四足罐和核心罩上的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluated Results of Seismic Design Approach Using Inelastic Dynamic Analysis for Equipment
Securing adequate seismic safety margins has been important in safety reviews regarding the seismic design of equipment and piping systems in nuclear power plants, and there exists an increasing need for a more exact method for evaluating these margins. To this end, it is reasonable to take into account the reduction of seismic responses resulting from inelastic deformation. The authors studied this approach utilizing an elastic allowable limit in existing standard. The applicability of the proposed evaluation method was investigated by comparison with the conventional evaluation method. The proposed method consists of an inelastic dynamic analysis and an elastic-static analysis. The elastic-static analysis uses a load obtained from the inelastic dynamic analysis. For the investigation, the result obtained from the proposed method was compared with that obtained from the conventional elastic analysis to quantify the reduction in responses leading to seismic safety margins. For the comparison, the authors constructed three models that simulate a cantilever-type beam, four-legged tank, and core shroud and applied them to the analysis herein, and the applicability of our method was discussed for these models. In this paper, we present three topics. First, we present a scheme for developing the design approach of using inelastic analysis. Second, we report a sensitivity study of model parameters, such as yielding stress and second stiffness, done by analyzing the cantilever-type beam for the proposed method. Finally, we report the application of the method to the four-legged tank and core shroud.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信