见证

D. Laub
{"title":"见证","authors":"D. Laub","doi":"10.4324/9780429292965-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"n engl j med 381;6 nejm.org August 8, 2019 antibiotics and finding strategies for preventing or treating infections that don’t rely solely on antibiotics.1 Nonprofit organizations could participate in developing new vaccines to prevent infections, as well as immunotherapies, nutritional-deprivation strategies, inflammatory modulators, and other approaches to treat them.3 The greatest challenge associated with a nonprofit-driven model is identifying seed capital for establishing such organizations. In this regard, we believe that making a one-time investment of a billion dollars to create several new nonprofits that sustainably discover and develop new antibiotics might be a better longterm investment than perpetually offering multibillion-dollar prizes or other pull incentives for each new antibiotic. Shifting to a new model of drug development will naturally threaten players with vested interests in for-profit discovery of antibiotics. Traditionalists will probably argue that nonprofits cannot replace for-profit industry as a vehicle for innovation. But for-profit companies haven’t been able to reliably generate sufficient income from the sale of new antibiotics to satisfy shareholder demands for revenue growth, despite frequently focusing their efforts on antibiotics with larger perceived markets at the expense of addressing unmet needs. The economic outlook for development of antibiotics will worsen over time as new ones reach the clinic and contribute to an ever-more commoditized market. The increasingly loud drumbeat calling for additional subsidies for the pharmaceutical industry to develop new antibiotics conflicts with the realities of the daunting U.S. federal debt that has been driven up by high health care costs, the low esteem in which the public holds the pharmaceutical industry, and rising concerns about the costs of pharmaceuticals. Such dynamics will impede policies that include new pharmaceutical subsidies, irrespective of their potential effectiveness. An alternative model for sustaining discovery of antibiotics is overdue. We believe it is time to seriously consider the establishment of nonprofit organizations for developing these lifesaving drugs.","PeriodicalId":124638,"journal":{"name":"The Handbook of Psychoanalytic Holocaust Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bearing witness\",\"authors\":\"D. Laub\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429292965-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"n engl j med 381;6 nejm.org August 8, 2019 antibiotics and finding strategies for preventing or treating infections that don’t rely solely on antibiotics.1 Nonprofit organizations could participate in developing new vaccines to prevent infections, as well as immunotherapies, nutritional-deprivation strategies, inflammatory modulators, and other approaches to treat them.3 The greatest challenge associated with a nonprofit-driven model is identifying seed capital for establishing such organizations. In this regard, we believe that making a one-time investment of a billion dollars to create several new nonprofits that sustainably discover and develop new antibiotics might be a better longterm investment than perpetually offering multibillion-dollar prizes or other pull incentives for each new antibiotic. Shifting to a new model of drug development will naturally threaten players with vested interests in for-profit discovery of antibiotics. Traditionalists will probably argue that nonprofits cannot replace for-profit industry as a vehicle for innovation. But for-profit companies haven’t been able to reliably generate sufficient income from the sale of new antibiotics to satisfy shareholder demands for revenue growth, despite frequently focusing their efforts on antibiotics with larger perceived markets at the expense of addressing unmet needs. The economic outlook for development of antibiotics will worsen over time as new ones reach the clinic and contribute to an ever-more commoditized market. The increasingly loud drumbeat calling for additional subsidies for the pharmaceutical industry to develop new antibiotics conflicts with the realities of the daunting U.S. federal debt that has been driven up by high health care costs, the low esteem in which the public holds the pharmaceutical industry, and rising concerns about the costs of pharmaceuticals. Such dynamics will impede policies that include new pharmaceutical subsidies, irrespective of their potential effectiveness. An alternative model for sustaining discovery of antibiotics is overdue. We believe it is time to seriously consider the establishment of nonprofit organizations for developing these lifesaving drugs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Handbook of Psychoanalytic Holocaust Studies\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Handbook of Psychoanalytic Holocaust Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429292965-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Handbook of Psychoanalytic Holocaust Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429292965-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bearing witness
n engl j med 381;6 nejm.org August 8, 2019 antibiotics and finding strategies for preventing or treating infections that don’t rely solely on antibiotics.1 Nonprofit organizations could participate in developing new vaccines to prevent infections, as well as immunotherapies, nutritional-deprivation strategies, inflammatory modulators, and other approaches to treat them.3 The greatest challenge associated with a nonprofit-driven model is identifying seed capital for establishing such organizations. In this regard, we believe that making a one-time investment of a billion dollars to create several new nonprofits that sustainably discover and develop new antibiotics might be a better longterm investment than perpetually offering multibillion-dollar prizes or other pull incentives for each new antibiotic. Shifting to a new model of drug development will naturally threaten players with vested interests in for-profit discovery of antibiotics. Traditionalists will probably argue that nonprofits cannot replace for-profit industry as a vehicle for innovation. But for-profit companies haven’t been able to reliably generate sufficient income from the sale of new antibiotics to satisfy shareholder demands for revenue growth, despite frequently focusing their efforts on antibiotics with larger perceived markets at the expense of addressing unmet needs. The economic outlook for development of antibiotics will worsen over time as new ones reach the clinic and contribute to an ever-more commoditized market. The increasingly loud drumbeat calling for additional subsidies for the pharmaceutical industry to develop new antibiotics conflicts with the realities of the daunting U.S. federal debt that has been driven up by high health care costs, the low esteem in which the public holds the pharmaceutical industry, and rising concerns about the costs of pharmaceuticals. Such dynamics will impede policies that include new pharmaceutical subsidies, irrespective of their potential effectiveness. An alternative model for sustaining discovery of antibiotics is overdue. We believe it is time to seriously consider the establishment of nonprofit organizations for developing these lifesaving drugs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信