马其顿苹果园化学防治不均等风蛾和白足蛾的新机遇

R. Rusevski, B. Kuzmanovska, Eftim Petkovski, Katerina Bandzo Oreskovic
{"title":"马其顿苹果园化学防治不均等风蛾和白足蛾的新机遇","authors":"R. Rusevski, B. Kuzmanovska, Eftim Petkovski, Katerina Bandzo Oreskovic","doi":"10.55302/jafes18723012r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The possibility of simultaneous effective control of apple scab and apple powdery mildew, by using single fungicidal active substance, and to compare the obtained results with those from standard chemical control, were the main goal of these experiments. In this study two fungicides were included: Sercadis (a.m. fluxapyroxad) and Indar 5 EW (a.m. fenbuconazole). Experiment was conducted during the 2016 in region of Prespa and region of Tetovo, on two apple varieties, idared and golden delicious. In untreated variant in region of Tetovo, significantly high level of infection of apple scab (43%) and apple powdery mildew (18,2%) were recorded. In region of Prespa, the situation with the control variant was quite the opposite (15,2% apple scab and 36% apple powdery mildew infection). Regarding the efficacy of tested fungicides, in region of Tetovo, the standard fungicide Indar 5 EW (a.m. fenbuconazole) provided protection efficiency of 94,58% against apple scab and 98,18% against apple powdery mildew. In the same region, the efficacy in variants treated with fungicide Sercadis was quite similar (92,65% efficacy protect against apple scab and 98,68 against apple powdery mildew). In region of Prespa, the efficacy performance of standard fungicide against apple scab and powdery mildew (95,65% and 94,44% respectively) was almost equal with the performance of fungicide Sercadis (94,53% and 96,66%).","PeriodicalId":414064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences","volume":"7 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHEMICAL CONTROL OF VENTURIA INAEQUALIS AND PODOSPHAERA LEUCOTRICHA IN APPLE ORCHARDS IN MACEDONIA\",\"authors\":\"R. Rusevski, B. Kuzmanovska, Eftim Petkovski, Katerina Bandzo Oreskovic\",\"doi\":\"10.55302/jafes18723012r\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The possibility of simultaneous effective control of apple scab and apple powdery mildew, by using single fungicidal active substance, and to compare the obtained results with those from standard chemical control, were the main goal of these experiments. In this study two fungicides were included: Sercadis (a.m. fluxapyroxad) and Indar 5 EW (a.m. fenbuconazole). Experiment was conducted during the 2016 in region of Prespa and region of Tetovo, on two apple varieties, idared and golden delicious. In untreated variant in region of Tetovo, significantly high level of infection of apple scab (43%) and apple powdery mildew (18,2%) were recorded. In region of Prespa, the situation with the control variant was quite the opposite (15,2% apple scab and 36% apple powdery mildew infection). Regarding the efficacy of tested fungicides, in region of Tetovo, the standard fungicide Indar 5 EW (a.m. fenbuconazole) provided protection efficiency of 94,58% against apple scab and 98,18% against apple powdery mildew. In the same region, the efficacy in variants treated with fungicide Sercadis was quite similar (92,65% efficacy protect against apple scab and 98,68 against apple powdery mildew). In region of Prespa, the efficacy performance of standard fungicide against apple scab and powdery mildew (95,65% and 94,44% respectively) was almost equal with the performance of fungicide Sercadis (94,53% and 96,66%).\",\"PeriodicalId\":414064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"7 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55302/jafes18723012r\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55302/jafes18723012r","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究单一杀真菌活性物质同时有效防治苹果痂病和苹果白粉病的可能性,并将其与标准化学防治效果进行比较。本研究包括两种杀菌剂:Sercadis (a.m. fluxapyroxad)和Indar 5ew (a.m. fenbuconazole)。实验于2016年在Prespa地区和Tetovo地区进行,实验对象是两个苹果品种,红苹果和金香苹果。在Tetovo地区未经处理的变异中,苹果痂病(43%)和苹果白粉病(18.2%)的侵染率显著升高。在普雷斯帕地区,控制变异的情况正好相反(15.2%的苹果痂病和36%的苹果白粉病感染)。在杀菌剂的药效方面,在泰托沃地区,标准杀菌剂Indar 5 EW (a.m.芬布康唑)对苹果痂病的防效为94.58%,对苹果白粉病的防效为98.18%。在同一地区,用杀菌剂Sercadis处理的不同品种对苹果痂病和白粉病的防治效果相似(分别为92.65%和98.68%)。在普雷斯帕地区,标准杀菌剂对苹果痂病和白粉病的防治效果(分别为95,65%和94,44%)与杀菌剂Sercadis的防治效果(分别为94,53%和96,66%)基本持平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHEMICAL CONTROL OF VENTURIA INAEQUALIS AND PODOSPHAERA LEUCOTRICHA IN APPLE ORCHARDS IN MACEDONIA
The possibility of simultaneous effective control of apple scab and apple powdery mildew, by using single fungicidal active substance, and to compare the obtained results with those from standard chemical control, were the main goal of these experiments. In this study two fungicides were included: Sercadis (a.m. fluxapyroxad) and Indar 5 EW (a.m. fenbuconazole). Experiment was conducted during the 2016 in region of Prespa and region of Tetovo, on two apple varieties, idared and golden delicious. In untreated variant in region of Tetovo, significantly high level of infection of apple scab (43%) and apple powdery mildew (18,2%) were recorded. In region of Prespa, the situation with the control variant was quite the opposite (15,2% apple scab and 36% apple powdery mildew infection). Regarding the efficacy of tested fungicides, in region of Tetovo, the standard fungicide Indar 5 EW (a.m. fenbuconazole) provided protection efficiency of 94,58% against apple scab and 98,18% against apple powdery mildew. In the same region, the efficacy in variants treated with fungicide Sercadis was quite similar (92,65% efficacy protect against apple scab and 98,68 against apple powdery mildew). In region of Prespa, the efficacy performance of standard fungicide against apple scab and powdery mildew (95,65% and 94,44% respectively) was almost equal with the performance of fungicide Sercadis (94,53% and 96,66%).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信