拒绝访问

Diana Madril
{"title":"拒绝访问","authors":"Diana Madril","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) and biometric technology, some would argue as innovative and responsible, yet over time other researchers have seen the less inclusive environment these technologies create. Additionally, the gaps in these predictive technology systems may deny access to some individuals and, in some cases, deem the technology as a truth-telling mechanism even when proper identification is presented. This paper highlights a literature review and discussion around the ways we may responsibly innovate. Responsible innovation, anticipatory governance, and policy decision making can shape innovative practices' fabrication molded for an inclusive environment. The paper also bridges a collective discussion of researchers who argue the harmful impacts within these innovative technology systems that guide our social environments. Oftentimes, we assume the systems innovated, such as AI and biometric technology, provide a path for control and safety. Yet, we need to reconsider the undesirable impact and discover new ways to create inclusive technology that does not wrongfully deny access to some citizens. The governance of technology may be a path for responsibly structuring for the public's interest. These innovative systems are theoretically set for shaping our future, yet some researchers argue these technology systems contain archaic social system practices.","PeriodicalId":196560,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access Denied\",\"authors\":\"Diana Madril\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial intelligence (AI) and biometric technology, some would argue as innovative and responsible, yet over time other researchers have seen the less inclusive environment these technologies create. Additionally, the gaps in these predictive technology systems may deny access to some individuals and, in some cases, deem the technology as a truth-telling mechanism even when proper identification is presented. This paper highlights a literature review and discussion around the ways we may responsibly innovate. Responsible innovation, anticipatory governance, and policy decision making can shape innovative practices' fabrication molded for an inclusive environment. The paper also bridges a collective discussion of researchers who argue the harmful impacts within these innovative technology systems that guide our social environments. Oftentimes, we assume the systems innovated, such as AI and biometric technology, provide a path for control and safety. Yet, we need to reconsider the undesirable impact and discover new ways to create inclusive technology that does not wrongfully deny access to some citizens. The governance of technology may be a path for responsibly structuring for the public's interest. These innovative systems are theoretically set for shaping our future, yet some researchers argue these technology systems contain archaic social system practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)和生物识别技术,有些人认为是创新和负责任的,但随着时间的推移,其他研究人员看到了这些技术创造的不那么包容的环境。此外,这些预测技术系统的漏洞可能会拒绝某些个人的访问,并且在某些情况下,即使提供了适当的身份识别,也会将该技术视为一种讲真话的机制。本文重点介绍了文献综述和围绕我们可能负责任的创新方式的讨论。负责任的创新、前瞻性的治理和政策决策可以塑造为包容性环境而塑造的创新实践。这篇论文还连接了研究人员的集体讨论,他们认为这些引导我们社会环境的创新技术系统会产生有害影响。通常,我们认为创新的系统,如人工智能和生物识别技术,提供了控制和安全的途径。然而,我们需要重新考虑不良影响,并找到创造包容性技术的新方法,而不是错误地拒绝某些公民访问。技术治理可能是一条以负责任的方式构建公众利益的道路。从理论上讲,这些创新系统将塑造我们的未来,但一些研究人员认为,这些技术系统包含了古老的社会系统实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Access Denied
Artificial intelligence (AI) and biometric technology, some would argue as innovative and responsible, yet over time other researchers have seen the less inclusive environment these technologies create. Additionally, the gaps in these predictive technology systems may deny access to some individuals and, in some cases, deem the technology as a truth-telling mechanism even when proper identification is presented. This paper highlights a literature review and discussion around the ways we may responsibly innovate. Responsible innovation, anticipatory governance, and policy decision making can shape innovative practices' fabrication molded for an inclusive environment. The paper also bridges a collective discussion of researchers who argue the harmful impacts within these innovative technology systems that guide our social environments. Oftentimes, we assume the systems innovated, such as AI and biometric technology, provide a path for control and safety. Yet, we need to reconsider the undesirable impact and discover new ways to create inclusive technology that does not wrongfully deny access to some citizens. The governance of technology may be a path for responsibly structuring for the public's interest. These innovative systems are theoretically set for shaping our future, yet some researchers argue these technology systems contain archaic social system practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信