在向行政法院挑战空气保护方案的可能性的背景下,法律利益的概念。对欧洲法院2022年12月22日判决的评注,C 61/21。

Joanna Daros – Pawlyta, Adam Pawlyta
{"title":"在向行政法院挑战空气保护方案的可能性的背景下,法律利益的概念。对欧洲法院2022年12月22日判决的评注,C 61/21。","authors":"Joanna Daros – Pawlyta, Adam Pawlyta","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.3295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper focuses on an analysis of the issue of legal interest in the context of the contestabilityof air protection programmes before administrative courts. The evaluation of newarguments for the identification of legal interest, in acts of European law and internationalobligations, is particularly noteworthy. The article analyses the so-called pro-EU interpretationas a possible source of legal interest in administrative law. Above all, the article examinesthe current case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the European Court ofHuman Rights, and in Poland the Constitutional Tribunal, the Supreme Administrative Courtand provincial administrative courts, the Supreme Court and the ordinary courts. The judgmentof the CJEU of December 22, 2022, C-61/21, is discussed in particular in relation to thelegal solutions adopted in Poland for air protection, leading to the proposal of de lege ferendachanges indicated in the conclusions to this article.","PeriodicalId":403517,"journal":{"name":"Kwartalnik Prawa Międzynarodowego","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The concept of legal interest in the context of the possibility of challenging an air protection programme before an administrativecourt. Remarks on the CJEU judgment of 22 December 2022, C 61/21.\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Daros – Pawlyta, Adam Pawlyta\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0016.3295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper focuses on an analysis of the issue of legal interest in the context of the contestabilityof air protection programmes before administrative courts. The evaluation of newarguments for the identification of legal interest, in acts of European law and internationalobligations, is particularly noteworthy. The article analyses the so-called pro-EU interpretationas a possible source of legal interest in administrative law. Above all, the article examinesthe current case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the European Court ofHuman Rights, and in Poland the Constitutional Tribunal, the Supreme Administrative Courtand provincial administrative courts, the Supreme Court and the ordinary courts. The judgmentof the CJEU of December 22, 2022, C-61/21, is discussed in particular in relation to thelegal solutions adopted in Poland for air protection, leading to the proposal of de lege ferendachanges indicated in the conclusions to this article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kwartalnik Prawa Międzynarodowego\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kwartalnik Prawa Międzynarodowego\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.3295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kwartalnik Prawa Międzynarodowego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.3295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文着重分析了行政法院对空气保护方案的可争议性背景下的法律利益问题。特别值得注意的是对欧洲法律行为和国际义务中确定法律利益的新论点的评价。文章分析了所谓的亲欧盟解释作为行政法上法律利益的可能来源。首先,本文考察了欧盟法院、欧洲人权法院、波兰宪法法庭、最高行政法院和省级行政法院、最高法院和普通法院的现行判例法。本文特别讨论了欧洲法院2022年12月22日C-61/21号判决书,该判决书与波兰为保护空气而采取的法律解决办法有关,从而提出了本文结论中所述的法律上的修改建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The concept of legal interest in the context of the possibility of challenging an air protection programme before an administrativecourt. Remarks on the CJEU judgment of 22 December 2022, C 61/21.
The paper focuses on an analysis of the issue of legal interest in the context of the contestabilityof air protection programmes before administrative courts. The evaluation of newarguments for the identification of legal interest, in acts of European law and internationalobligations, is particularly noteworthy. The article analyses the so-called pro-EU interpretationas a possible source of legal interest in administrative law. Above all, the article examinesthe current case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the European Court ofHuman Rights, and in Poland the Constitutional Tribunal, the Supreme Administrative Courtand provincial administrative courts, the Supreme Court and the ordinary courts. The judgmentof the CJEU of December 22, 2022, C-61/21, is discussed in particular in relation to thelegal solutions adopted in Poland for air protection, leading to the proposal of de lege ferendachanges indicated in the conclusions to this article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信