Daniel Buquet, Rafael Piñeiro, Richard Salvat, Lucía Selios, Daniela Vairo
{"title":"反腐败","authors":"Daniel Buquet, Rafael Piñeiro, Richard Salvat, Lucía Selios, Daniela Vairo","doi":"10.5790/hongkong/9789888083091.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transparency scores in Uruguay have improved in the last fifteen years in both absolute and comparative terms. This paper argues that this change is the result of a long-run process of transformation in Uruguayan politics from competitive particularism to an open access regime. First, this paper briefly reviews the political and institutional changes that led governance in Uruguay to be based on universalistic norms. Next, it uses public opinion and elite survey data to provide descriptive evidence about citizen perceptions of levels of corruption. Third, the paper uses media data to explore the place that corruption held in the public agenda during the last fifteen years. Finally, using court records, it evaluates the efficacy of existing structures to punish abuses. These analyses help to clarify the main features that lie behind the categorization of Uruguay as a contemporary achiever in terms of government transparency. 1 Paper prepared for the XXII nd World Congress of Political Science, 8-12 July 2012, Madrid","PeriodicalId":176954,"journal":{"name":"The UK and EMEA Corporate Counsel Handbook","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-corruption\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Buquet, Rafael Piñeiro, Richard Salvat, Lucía Selios, Daniela Vairo\",\"doi\":\"10.5790/hongkong/9789888083091.003.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Transparency scores in Uruguay have improved in the last fifteen years in both absolute and comparative terms. This paper argues that this change is the result of a long-run process of transformation in Uruguayan politics from competitive particularism to an open access regime. First, this paper briefly reviews the political and institutional changes that led governance in Uruguay to be based on universalistic norms. Next, it uses public opinion and elite survey data to provide descriptive evidence about citizen perceptions of levels of corruption. Third, the paper uses media data to explore the place that corruption held in the public agenda during the last fifteen years. Finally, using court records, it evaluates the efficacy of existing structures to punish abuses. These analyses help to clarify the main features that lie behind the categorization of Uruguay as a contemporary achiever in terms of government transparency. 1 Paper prepared for the XXII nd World Congress of Political Science, 8-12 July 2012, Madrid\",\"PeriodicalId\":176954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The UK and EMEA Corporate Counsel Handbook\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The UK and EMEA Corporate Counsel Handbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789888083091.003.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The UK and EMEA Corporate Counsel Handbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789888083091.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Transparency scores in Uruguay have improved in the last fifteen years in both absolute and comparative terms. This paper argues that this change is the result of a long-run process of transformation in Uruguayan politics from competitive particularism to an open access regime. First, this paper briefly reviews the political and institutional changes that led governance in Uruguay to be based on universalistic norms. Next, it uses public opinion and elite survey data to provide descriptive evidence about citizen perceptions of levels of corruption. Third, the paper uses media data to explore the place that corruption held in the public agenda during the last fifteen years. Finally, using court records, it evaluates the efficacy of existing structures to punish abuses. These analyses help to clarify the main features that lie behind the categorization of Uruguay as a contemporary achiever in terms of government transparency. 1 Paper prepared for the XXII nd World Congress of Political Science, 8-12 July 2012, Madrid
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
