利用动态分析确定静态检测缺陷的可达性

A. Gerasimov, L. Kruglov
{"title":"利用动态分析确定静态检测缺陷的可达性","authors":"A. Gerasimov, L. Kruglov","doi":"10.1109/CSITECHNOL.2017.8312141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Static and dynamic analysis of programs are well known approaches to the problem of automatic program behaviour analysis. Both methods have advantages and limitations. Static analysis has lack of precision for the sake of scalability. On the other hand, dynamic analysis has 100% precision while reaching defect point, but suffers from scalability issues. This paper describes an approach to confirmation of reachability of source-sink defects that were found by static analysis with help of dynamic analysis. The combination of methods allows to circumvent limitations and multiply their advantages. Preliminary experiments on several open source projects show that real true positive defects can be confirmed to be reachable using the approach and some false positives can be proved.","PeriodicalId":332371,"journal":{"name":"2017 Computer Science and Information Technologies (CSIT)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reachability confirmation of statically detected defects using dynamic analysis\",\"authors\":\"A. Gerasimov, L. Kruglov\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSITECHNOL.2017.8312141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Static and dynamic analysis of programs are well known approaches to the problem of automatic program behaviour analysis. Both methods have advantages and limitations. Static analysis has lack of precision for the sake of scalability. On the other hand, dynamic analysis has 100% precision while reaching defect point, but suffers from scalability issues. This paper describes an approach to confirmation of reachability of source-sink defects that were found by static analysis with help of dynamic analysis. The combination of methods allows to circumvent limitations and multiply their advantages. Preliminary experiments on several open source projects show that real true positive defects can be confirmed to be reachable using the approach and some false positives can be proved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Computer Science and Information Technologies (CSIT)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Computer Science and Information Technologies (CSIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSITECHNOL.2017.8312141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Computer Science and Information Technologies (CSIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSITECHNOL.2017.8312141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

程序的静态和动态分析是解决自动程序行为分析问题的众所周知的方法。两种方法各有优缺点。静态分析由于缺乏可伸缩性而缺乏精确性。另一方面,动态分析在到达缺陷点时具有100%的精度,但存在可伸缩性问题。本文描述了一种利用动态分析来确定静态分析发现的源库缺陷的可达性的方法。这些方法的结合可以规避限制,并使其优势倍增。在几个开源项目上的初步实验表明,使用该方法可以确定真实的真阳性缺陷,并且可以证明一些假阳性缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reachability confirmation of statically detected defects using dynamic analysis
Static and dynamic analysis of programs are well known approaches to the problem of automatic program behaviour analysis. Both methods have advantages and limitations. Static analysis has lack of precision for the sake of scalability. On the other hand, dynamic analysis has 100% precision while reaching defect point, but suffers from scalability issues. This paper describes an approach to confirmation of reachability of source-sink defects that were found by static analysis with help of dynamic analysis. The combination of methods allows to circumvent limitations and multiply their advantages. Preliminary experiments on several open source projects show that real true positive defects can be confirmed to be reachable using the approach and some false positives can be proved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信