考虑外国利益:美国和欧盟的规则制定

Ayelet Berman
{"title":"考虑外国利益:美国和欧盟的规则制定","authors":"Ayelet Berman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2722635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Domestic regulations increasingly have effects on foreign actors. International law offers no general rules about such regulatory effects. In practice, however, the U.S. and EU rulemaking processes are increasingly open to foreigners. In both jurisdictions regulators are obliged under domestic law to highlight certain proposed rules that have international impacts, and foreigners may in turn participate in notice and comment procedures. In addition, certain regulatory impact assessments take impacts on foreigners into account. These practices pose a puzzle: why would states willingly constrain their policy choices? Why do they seek to learn the preferences of actors outside their polity? I argue that the main rationale behind these practices is their enlightened self-interest in improving market-openness. These principles of openness towards foreigners are now embedded in OECD best practices, which suggests that they might find their way into the domestic legal systems of other countries.","PeriodicalId":340197,"journal":{"name":"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking Foreign Interests into Account: Rulemaking in the U.S. and EU\",\"authors\":\"Ayelet Berman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2722635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Domestic regulations increasingly have effects on foreign actors. International law offers no general rules about such regulatory effects. In practice, however, the U.S. and EU rulemaking processes are increasingly open to foreigners. In both jurisdictions regulators are obliged under domestic law to highlight certain proposed rules that have international impacts, and foreigners may in turn participate in notice and comment procedures. In addition, certain regulatory impact assessments take impacts on foreigners into account. These practices pose a puzzle: why would states willingly constrain their policy choices? Why do they seek to learn the preferences of actors outside their polity? I argue that the main rationale behind these practices is their enlightened self-interest in improving market-openness. These principles of openness towards foreigners are now embedded in OECD best practices, which suggests that they might find their way into the domestic legal systems of other countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2722635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2722635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国内法规对外国参与者的影响越来越大。国际法对这种管制效果没有一般性规定。然而,在实践中,美国和欧盟的规则制定过程对外国人越来越开放。在这两个司法管辖区,根据国内法,监管机构有义务强调某些具有国际影响的拟议规则,外国人也可以参与通知和评论程序。此外,某些监管影响评估也考虑到对外国人的影响。这些做法带来了一个难题:为什么国家愿意限制自己的政策选择?他们为什么要试图了解其政体之外行为者的偏好?我认为,这些做法背后的主要理由是,它们在提高市场开放方面具有开明的自身利益。这些对外国人开放的原则现在已经融入了经合组织的最佳实践,这表明它们可能会进入其他国家的国内法律体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taking Foreign Interests into Account: Rulemaking in the U.S. and EU
Domestic regulations increasingly have effects on foreign actors. International law offers no general rules about such regulatory effects. In practice, however, the U.S. and EU rulemaking processes are increasingly open to foreigners. In both jurisdictions regulators are obliged under domestic law to highlight certain proposed rules that have international impacts, and foreigners may in turn participate in notice and comment procedures. In addition, certain regulatory impact assessments take impacts on foreigners into account. These practices pose a puzzle: why would states willingly constrain their policy choices? Why do they seek to learn the preferences of actors outside their polity? I argue that the main rationale behind these practices is their enlightened self-interest in improving market-openness. These principles of openness towards foreigners are now embedded in OECD best practices, which suggests that they might find their way into the domestic legal systems of other countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信