机器学习技术在协同异常检测中的应用

Secil Senel-Kleine, Johannes Bouché, Martin Kappes
{"title":"机器学习技术在协同异常检测中的应用","authors":"Secil Senel-Kleine, Johannes Bouché, Martin Kappes","doi":"10.1109/ITECHA.2015.7317397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the increase in network attacks, anomaly detection has gained importance. In this paper, we present and investigate the idea of institutions cooperating for performing anomaly detection, i.e. institutions jointly analyzing their network traffic, in order to identify malicious attacks, using classification-based machine learning techniques. We compare the results of such a collaborative analysis with a single analysis. Moreover, as institutions might not be willing to share confidential data, we analyze the benefits of a collaborative approach if some parts of the traffic are being anonymized. While, intuitively, having more data at hand should lead to improved detection rates, our results indicate that a federated analysis using standard classification-based methods improves detection rates only slightly. Moreover, when using anonymized data, the obtained detection rates of a joint data analysis further deteriorate such that the analysis of individual traffic is more useful. Thus, our research indicates that the classical classification based machine learning approaches for anomaly detection must be adapted and improved in order to leverage the advantage of having data from various sources.","PeriodicalId":161782,"journal":{"name":"2015 Internet Technologies and Applications (ITA)","volume":"208 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the usefulness of machine learning techniques in collaborative anomaly detection\",\"authors\":\"Secil Senel-Kleine, Johannes Bouché, Martin Kappes\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITECHA.2015.7317397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the increase in network attacks, anomaly detection has gained importance. In this paper, we present and investigate the idea of institutions cooperating for performing anomaly detection, i.e. institutions jointly analyzing their network traffic, in order to identify malicious attacks, using classification-based machine learning techniques. We compare the results of such a collaborative analysis with a single analysis. Moreover, as institutions might not be willing to share confidential data, we analyze the benefits of a collaborative approach if some parts of the traffic are being anonymized. While, intuitively, having more data at hand should lead to improved detection rates, our results indicate that a federated analysis using standard classification-based methods improves detection rates only slightly. Moreover, when using anonymized data, the obtained detection rates of a joint data analysis further deteriorate such that the analysis of individual traffic is more useful. Thus, our research indicates that the classical classification based machine learning approaches for anomaly detection must be adapted and improved in order to leverage the advantage of having data from various sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 Internet Technologies and Applications (ITA)\",\"volume\":\"208 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 Internet Technologies and Applications (ITA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITECHA.2015.7317397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Internet Technologies and Applications (ITA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITECHA.2015.7317397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着网络攻击的增多,异常检测变得越来越重要。在本文中,我们提出并研究了机构合作执行异常检测的想法,即机构共同分析其网络流量,以便使用基于分类的机器学习技术识别恶意攻击。我们将这种协作分析的结果与单一分析的结果进行比较。此外,由于机构可能不愿意分享机密数据,我们分析了如果部分流量被匿名化,协作方法的好处。虽然直观地说,手头有更多的数据应该会提高检测率,但我们的结果表明,使用基于标准分类的方法进行联邦分析只能略微提高检测率。此外,当使用匿名数据时,联合数据分析的检测率会进一步降低,从而使对单个流量的分析更有用。因此,我们的研究表明,必须调整和改进用于异常检测的经典基于分类的机器学习方法,以利用来自各种来源的数据的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the usefulness of machine learning techniques in collaborative anomaly detection
Due to the increase in network attacks, anomaly detection has gained importance. In this paper, we present and investigate the idea of institutions cooperating for performing anomaly detection, i.e. institutions jointly analyzing their network traffic, in order to identify malicious attacks, using classification-based machine learning techniques. We compare the results of such a collaborative analysis with a single analysis. Moreover, as institutions might not be willing to share confidential data, we analyze the benefits of a collaborative approach if some parts of the traffic are being anonymized. While, intuitively, having more data at hand should lead to improved detection rates, our results indicate that a federated analysis using standard classification-based methods improves detection rates only slightly. Moreover, when using anonymized data, the obtained detection rates of a joint data analysis further deteriorate such that the analysis of individual traffic is more useful. Thus, our research indicates that the classical classification based machine learning approaches for anomaly detection must be adapted and improved in order to leverage the advantage of having data from various sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信