重新审视跨语言摘要:基于语料库的研究和改进标注的新基准

Yulong Chen, Huajian Zhang, Yijie Zhou, Xuefeng Bai, Yueguan Wang, Ming Zhong, Jianhao Yan, Yafu Li, Judy Li, Xianchao Zhu, Yue Zhang
{"title":"重新审视跨语言摘要:基于语料库的研究和改进标注的新基准","authors":"Yulong Chen, Huajian Zhang, Yijie Zhou, Xuefeng Bai, Yueguan Wang, Ming Zhong, Jianhao Yan, Yafu Li, Judy Li, Xianchao Zhu, Yue Zhang","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2307.04018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most existing cross-lingual summarization (CLS) work constructs CLS corpora by simply and directly translating pre-annotated summaries from one language to another, which can contain errors from both summarization and translation processes.To address this issue, we propose ConvSumX, a cross-lingual conversation summarization benchmark, through a new annotation schema that explicitly considers source input context.ConvSumX consists of 2 sub-tasks under different real-world scenarios, with each covering 3 language directions.We conduct thorough analysis on ConvSumX and 3 widely-used manually annotated CLS corpora and empirically find that ConvSumX is more faithful towards input text.Additionally, based on the same intuition, we propose a 2-Step method, which takes both conversation and summary as input to simulate human annotation process.Experimental results show that 2-Step method surpasses strong baselines on ConvSumX under both automatic and human evaluation.Analysis shows that both source input text and summary are crucial for modeling cross-lingual summaries.","PeriodicalId":352845,"journal":{"name":"Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting Cross-Lingual Summarization: A Corpus-based Study and A New Benchmark with Improved Annotation\",\"authors\":\"Yulong Chen, Huajian Zhang, Yijie Zhou, Xuefeng Bai, Yueguan Wang, Ming Zhong, Jianhao Yan, Yafu Li, Judy Li, Xianchao Zhu, Yue Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2307.04018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most existing cross-lingual summarization (CLS) work constructs CLS corpora by simply and directly translating pre-annotated summaries from one language to another, which can contain errors from both summarization and translation processes.To address this issue, we propose ConvSumX, a cross-lingual conversation summarization benchmark, through a new annotation schema that explicitly considers source input context.ConvSumX consists of 2 sub-tasks under different real-world scenarios, with each covering 3 language directions.We conduct thorough analysis on ConvSumX and 3 widely-used manually annotated CLS corpora and empirically find that ConvSumX is more faithful towards input text.Additionally, based on the same intuition, we propose a 2-Step method, which takes both conversation and summary as input to simulate human annotation process.Experimental results show that 2-Step method surpasses strong baselines on ConvSumX under both automatic and human evaluation.Analysis shows that both source input text and summary are crucial for modeling cross-lingual summaries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.04018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.04018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

大多数现有的跨语言摘要(CLS)工作通过简单直接地将预先标注的摘要从一种语言翻译成另一种语言来构建CLS语料库,这可能包含摘要和翻译过程中的错误。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了ConvSumX,一个跨语言会话摘要基准,通过一个新的注释模式,显式地考虑源输入上下文。ConvSumX在不同的现实场景下由2个子任务组成,每个子任务涵盖3个语言方向。我们对ConvSumX和3个广泛使用的人工标注CLS语料库进行了深入的分析,实证发现ConvSumX对输入文本更忠实。此外,基于同样的直觉,我们提出了一种以对话和摘要为输入来模拟人类注释过程的2-Step方法。实验结果表明,2-Step方法在自动和人工评估下都优于ConvSumX上的强基线。分析表明,源输入文本和摘要对于跨语言摘要建模至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting Cross-Lingual Summarization: A Corpus-based Study and A New Benchmark with Improved Annotation
Most existing cross-lingual summarization (CLS) work constructs CLS corpora by simply and directly translating pre-annotated summaries from one language to another, which can contain errors from both summarization and translation processes.To address this issue, we propose ConvSumX, a cross-lingual conversation summarization benchmark, through a new annotation schema that explicitly considers source input context.ConvSumX consists of 2 sub-tasks under different real-world scenarios, with each covering 3 language directions.We conduct thorough analysis on ConvSumX and 3 widely-used manually annotated CLS corpora and empirically find that ConvSumX is more faithful towards input text.Additionally, based on the same intuition, we propose a 2-Step method, which takes both conversation and summary as input to simulate human annotation process.Experimental results show that 2-Step method surpasses strong baselines on ConvSumX under both automatic and human evaluation.Analysis shows that both source input text and summary are crucial for modeling cross-lingual summaries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信