{"title":"性格价值,思维批判性和幼儿心理运动","authors":"Syarip Hidayat, Lutfia Nur","doi":"10.21009/jiv.1301.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research was distributed by the facts on the ground about the condition during the process of the achievement of early-childhood education that is not optimal. The process of educational achievement in question is the value of a character, critical-thinking ability and psychomotor early childhood. This research was conducted to find out the condition of the development of the value of the character, critical thinking and psychomotor children aged 5-6 years. This research uses survey method. The subjects for the students involved are early-childhood kindergarten Nurul Ilmi and TK Negeri Pembina. The number samples of this research in the study as many as 40 people. Long research conducted about two months. Instrument in this study using structured observation and documentation. The results from this study indicate that the profile of the value of the character, critical thinking and psychomotor children aged 5-6 years in kindergarten Nurul Ilmi Tasikmalaya and TK Negeri Pembina Tasikmalaya results still do not match expectations. This is apparent in the findings in kindergarten Nurul Ilmi that profile the value of character of 50.06%, critical thinking of 49.80% and psychomotor 50.87%. Whereas in TK Negeri Pembina character value profile of 51.22%, critical thinking of 50.98% and psychomotor 52.17%. Based on these findings, it is hoped all components in school, especially teachers can improve performance in order to optimize the potential of learners. \n \nReferences \nAli, M. (2011). Memahami riset perilaku dan sosial. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. \nArdiyansyah, E.C.A., (2012). Pengaruh permainan tradisional terhadap peningkatan keterampilansosial anak prasekolah. Disertasi. Surabaya: UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. \nBloom, B. S. dkk. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David McKay. \nEnnis, R.H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and disabilities. Sixth International Conference on Thinking at MIT Cambridge. Diakses melalui http://faculty.education.illinois.edu/rhennis/documents/TheNatureofCriticalThinking_51711_000.pdf \nGeldard, K. & Gerald, D. (2012). Konseling anak-anak. Jakarta: Indeks. \nHurlock, E. B. (2012). Psikologi perkembangan. Jakarta: Erlangga. \nJudiani, S. (2010). Implementasi pendidikan karakter di sekolah dasar melalui penguatan pelaksanaan kurikulum. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 16(9), 280-289. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v16i9.519 \nNurihsan, A. J. & Agustin, M. (2011). Dinamika perkembangan anak dan remaja. Bandung: Refika Aditama. \nPermendikbud Nomor 137 Tahun 2014 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini \nPurnama, S. (2016). Materi-materi pilihan dalam parenting education menurut Munif Chatib. Jurnal Ilmiah Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia Dini, 1(1), 1-16. http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/tarbiyah/index.php/goldenage/article/view/1245 \nRakhmat, C. & Solehuddin, M. (2006). Pengukuran dan penilaian hasil belajar. Bandung: Andira. \nRakhmat, C., Budiman, N., & Herawati, N. I. (2008). Psikologi pendidikan. Bandung: UPI Press. \nSantrock, J. W. (2007). Perkembangan anak. Jakarta: Erlangga. \nSaputri, N.I. (2014). Upaya meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas V melalui inkuiri terbimbing. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. \nSudaryanti. (2012). Pentingnya pendidikan karakter anak usia dini. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 1(1), 11-20. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpa/article/view/2902 \nSugiyono. (2012). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. \nSujiono, Y. N. (2009). Konsep dasar pendidikan anak usia dini. Jakarta: Indeks. \nSyaodih, E. dan Agustin, M. (2013). Penelitian bidang keilmuan: Penerapan permainan tradisional “Kaulinan Barudak†untuk mengembangkan nilai karakter anak. Bandung: UPI. \nVan de Waal, D. & Henriette, A. (1993). Environmental factors influencing growth and pubertal development environmental factors influencing growth and pubertal development. Amsterdam: Department of Pediatrics, Free University Hospital. \nYusuf. LN., S. (2012). Psikologi perkembangan anak & remaja. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.","PeriodicalId":234954,"journal":{"name":"JIV-Jurnal Ilmiah Visi","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NILAI KARAKTER, BERPIKIR KRITIS DAN PSIKOMOTORIK ANAK USIA DINI\",\"authors\":\"Syarip Hidayat, Lutfia Nur\",\"doi\":\"10.21009/jiv.1301.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research was distributed by the facts on the ground about the condition during the process of the achievement of early-childhood education that is not optimal. The process of educational achievement in question is the value of a character, critical-thinking ability and psychomotor early childhood. This research was conducted to find out the condition of the development of the value of the character, critical thinking and psychomotor children aged 5-6 years. This research uses survey method. The subjects for the students involved are early-childhood kindergarten Nurul Ilmi and TK Negeri Pembina. The number samples of this research in the study as many as 40 people. Long research conducted about two months. Instrument in this study using structured observation and documentation. The results from this study indicate that the profile of the value of the character, critical thinking and psychomotor children aged 5-6 years in kindergarten Nurul Ilmi Tasikmalaya and TK Negeri Pembina Tasikmalaya results still do not match expectations. This is apparent in the findings in kindergarten Nurul Ilmi that profile the value of character of 50.06%, critical thinking of 49.80% and psychomotor 50.87%. Whereas in TK Negeri Pembina character value profile of 51.22%, critical thinking of 50.98% and psychomotor 52.17%. Based on these findings, it is hoped all components in school, especially teachers can improve performance in order to optimize the potential of learners. \\n \\nReferences \\nAli, M. (2011). Memahami riset perilaku dan sosial. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. \\nArdiyansyah, E.C.A., (2012). Pengaruh permainan tradisional terhadap peningkatan keterampilansosial anak prasekolah. Disertasi. Surabaya: UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. \\nBloom, B. S. dkk. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David McKay. \\nEnnis, R.H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and disabilities. Sixth International Conference on Thinking at MIT Cambridge. Diakses melalui http://faculty.education.illinois.edu/rhennis/documents/TheNatureofCriticalThinking_51711_000.pdf \\nGeldard, K. & Gerald, D. (2012). Konseling anak-anak. Jakarta: Indeks. \\nHurlock, E. B. (2012). Psikologi perkembangan. Jakarta: Erlangga. \\nJudiani, S. (2010). Implementasi pendidikan karakter di sekolah dasar melalui penguatan pelaksanaan kurikulum. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 16(9), 280-289. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v16i9.519 \\nNurihsan, A. J. & Agustin, M. (2011). Dinamika perkembangan anak dan remaja. Bandung: Refika Aditama. \\nPermendikbud Nomor 137 Tahun 2014 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini \\nPurnama, S. (2016). Materi-materi pilihan dalam parenting education menurut Munif Chatib. Jurnal Ilmiah Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia Dini, 1(1), 1-16. http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/tarbiyah/index.php/goldenage/article/view/1245 \\nRakhmat, C. & Solehuddin, M. (2006). Pengukuran dan penilaian hasil belajar. Bandung: Andira. \\nRakhmat, C., Budiman, N., & Herawati, N. I. (2008). Psikologi pendidikan. Bandung: UPI Press. \\nSantrock, J. W. (2007). Perkembangan anak. Jakarta: Erlangga. \\nSaputri, N.I. (2014). Upaya meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas V melalui inkuiri terbimbing. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. \\nSudaryanti. (2012). Pentingnya pendidikan karakter anak usia dini. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 1(1), 11-20. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpa/article/view/2902 \\nSugiyono. (2012). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. \\nSujiono, Y. N. (2009). Konsep dasar pendidikan anak usia dini. Jakarta: Indeks. \\nSyaodih, E. dan Agustin, M. (2013). Penelitian bidang keilmuan: Penerapan permainan tradisional “Kaulinan Barudak†untuk mengembangkan nilai karakter anak. Bandung: UPI. \\nVan de Waal, D. & Henriette, A. (1993). Environmental factors influencing growth and pubertal development environmental factors influencing growth and pubertal development. Amsterdam: Department of Pediatrics, Free University Hospital. \\nYusuf. LN., S. (2012). Psikologi perkembangan anak & remaja. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JIV-Jurnal Ilmiah Visi\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JIV-Jurnal Ilmiah Visi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21009/jiv.1301.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JIV-Jurnal Ilmiah Visi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/jiv.1301.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
摘要
该研究是根据幼儿教育在实现过程中所处的不理想状态的实际情况进行分配的。所讨论的教育成就的过程是一个性格的价值,批判性思维能力和精神运动的早期儿童。本研究旨在了解5-6岁儿童性格、批判性思维和精神运动价值的发展状况。本研究采用调查法。所涉学生的研究对象为幼儿幼儿园Nurul Ilmi和TK Negeri Pembina。本研究的样本数量在研究中多达40人。长期研究进行了大约两个月。本研究采用结构化观察和文献记录的方法。本研究结果显示,5-6岁幼儿园儿童Nurul Ilmi Tasikmalaya和TK Negeri Pembina Tasikmalaya的性格、批判性思维和精神运动的价值评估结果仍不符合预期。在Nurul Ilmi幼儿园的调查结果中,性格价值为50.06%,批判性思维价值为49.80%,精神运动价值为50.87%。而在TK Negeri Pembina中,性格价值剖面占51.22%,批判性思维占50.98%,精神运动占52.17%。基于这些发现,希望学校的所有组成部分,特别是教师能够提高绩效,以优化学习者的潜力。参考文献Ali, M.(2011)。Memahami riset dangerous aku dan social。雅加达:Bumi Aksara。陈晓明,陈晓明,(2012)。Pengaruh永久的传统terhadap peningkatan keterampilansosial anak prasekolah。Disertasi。泗水:Sunan Ampel泗水。布卢姆,b.s. dkk。(1956)。教育目标的分类。纽约:大卫·麦凯。恩尼斯,R.H.(2011)。批判性思维的本质:批判性思维倾向和残疾的概述。第六届思维国际会议在麻省理工学院剑桥分校举行。Diakses melalui http://faculty.education.illinois.edu/rhennis/documents/TheNatureofCriticalThinking_51711_000.pdf Geldard, K. & Gerald, D.(2012)。Konseling anak-anak。雅加达:Indeks。E. B. Hurlock(2012)。Psikologi perkembangan。雅加达:Erlangga。Judiani, S.(2010)。企鹅是一种稀有动物,它是一种稀有动物。医学学报,16(9),280-289。doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v16i9.519 Nurihsan, a.j. & Agustin, M.(2011)。Dinamika perkembangan anak dan remaja。万隆:Refika Aditama。(2016).中国国家标准,2014年12月。物质上的家长教育计划。中华医学杂志,1(1),1-16。http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/tarbiyah/index.php/goldenage/article/view/1245 Rakhmat, C. & Solehuddin, M.(2006)。企鹅和企鹅的关系很好。万隆:Andira。Rakhmat, C., Budiman, N., & Herawati, N.(2008)。Psikologi pendidikan。万隆:合众国际社。Santrock, j.w.(2007)。亚衲族Perkembangan人。雅加达:Erlangga。Saputri, N.I.(2014)。【中文译文】:【中文译文】:【中文译文】Skripsi。日惹:日本日惹大学。Sudaryanti。(2012)。Pentingnya pendidikan karakter anak usia dini。生物医学工程学报,1(1),11-20。https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpa/article/view/2902 Sugiyono。(2012)。方法:定性、定量、研发。万隆:Alfabeta。Sujiono, yn .(2009)。Konsep dasar pendidikan anak usia dini。雅加达:Indeks。dan Agustin, M.(2013)。Penelitian bidang keilmuan: Penerapan永久传统的€œKaulinan barudak€untuk mengembangkan nilai karakter anak。万隆:美联社担任过资深驻外记者等职。Van de Waal, D.和Henriette, A.(1993)。影响生长和青春期发育的环境因素。阿姆斯特丹:自由大学医院儿科。优素福。LN。, s .(2012)。心理学perkembangan anak & remaja万隆:Remaja Rosdakarya。
NILAI KARAKTER, BERPIKIR KRITIS DAN PSIKOMOTORIK ANAK USIA DINI
The research was distributed by the facts on the ground about the condition during the process of the achievement of early-childhood education that is not optimal. The process of educational achievement in question is the value of a character, critical-thinking ability and psychomotor early childhood. This research was conducted to find out the condition of the development of the value of the character, critical thinking and psychomotor children aged 5-6 years. This research uses survey method. The subjects for the students involved are early-childhood kindergarten Nurul Ilmi and TK Negeri Pembina. The number samples of this research in the study as many as 40 people. Long research conducted about two months. Instrument in this study using structured observation and documentation. The results from this study indicate that the profile of the value of the character, critical thinking and psychomotor children aged 5-6 years in kindergarten Nurul Ilmi Tasikmalaya and TK Negeri Pembina Tasikmalaya results still do not match expectations. This is apparent in the findings in kindergarten Nurul Ilmi that profile the value of character of 50.06%, critical thinking of 49.80% and psychomotor 50.87%. Whereas in TK Negeri Pembina character value profile of 51.22%, critical thinking of 50.98% and psychomotor 52.17%. Based on these findings, it is hoped all components in school, especially teachers can improve performance in order to optimize the potential of learners.
References
Ali, M. (2011). Memahami riset perilaku dan sosial. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Ardiyansyah, E.C.A., (2012). Pengaruh permainan tradisional terhadap peningkatan keterampilansosial anak prasekolah. Disertasi. Surabaya: UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.
Bloom, B. S. dkk. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David McKay.
Ennis, R.H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and disabilities. Sixth International Conference on Thinking at MIT Cambridge. Diakses melalui http://faculty.education.illinois.edu/rhennis/documents/TheNatureofCriticalThinking_51711_000.pdf
Geldard, K. & Gerald, D. (2012). Konseling anak-anak. Jakarta: Indeks.
Hurlock, E. B. (2012). Psikologi perkembangan. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Judiani, S. (2010). Implementasi pendidikan karakter di sekolah dasar melalui penguatan pelaksanaan kurikulum. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 16(9), 280-289. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v16i9.519
Nurihsan, A. J. & Agustin, M. (2011). Dinamika perkembangan anak dan remaja. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Permendikbud Nomor 137 Tahun 2014 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini
Purnama, S. (2016). Materi-materi pilihan dalam parenting education menurut Munif Chatib. Jurnal Ilmiah Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia Dini, 1(1), 1-16. http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/tarbiyah/index.php/goldenage/article/view/1245
Rakhmat, C. & Solehuddin, M. (2006). Pengukuran dan penilaian hasil belajar. Bandung: Andira.
Rakhmat, C., Budiman, N., & Herawati, N. I. (2008). Psikologi pendidikan. Bandung: UPI Press.
Santrock, J. W. (2007). Perkembangan anak. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Saputri, N.I. (2014). Upaya meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas V melalui inkuiri terbimbing. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Sudaryanti. (2012). Pentingnya pendidikan karakter anak usia dini. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 1(1), 11-20. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpa/article/view/2902
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sujiono, Y. N. (2009). Konsep dasar pendidikan anak usia dini. Jakarta: Indeks.
Syaodih, E. dan Agustin, M. (2013). Penelitian bidang keilmuan: Penerapan permainan tradisional “Kaulinan Barudak†untuk mengembangkan nilai karakter anak. Bandung: UPI.
Van de Waal, D. & Henriette, A. (1993). Environmental factors influencing growth and pubertal development environmental factors influencing growth and pubertal development. Amsterdam: Department of Pediatrics, Free University Hospital.
Yusuf. LN., S. (2012). Psikologi perkembangan anak & remaja. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.