一种MDA工具的分类方法

Anton Chernichkin, O. Ņikiforova
{"title":"一种MDA工具的分类方法","authors":"Anton Chernichkin, O. Ņikiforova","doi":"10.2478/v10143-009-0006-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An approach to classification of MDA tools Nowadays there is a wide variety of tools, supporting the idea of software development process to be enriched by the principles of modelling—the source code is being generated from the model. Many of these purporting to be \"MDA complaint\" as well. Model driven architecture offers an approach to software development process that provides a separation of concerns, keeping the appropriate level of abstraction on each stage of development. Furthermore, the source code can be generated in a formal way, requiring no interference from the developer. There are two types of software development tools: the former type represents the semiautomatic approach, where the software is supposed to be created using system's model and code transformations, also considering different types of routines, which are done manually, while the latter type is an automatic solution, where no manual steps or routines are required. The original article defines various perspectives on positioning of MDA tools among CASE tools for software development, as well as proposes a methodological approach on classification of MDA tools. One of the perspectives that can be used in the MDA tool classification approach corresponds with the Model Driven Development life cycle, while the other one defines the role of modelling and model application levels in a whole development process. In addition, various sets of features have been defined, in order to clarify the accordance level of these tools from the MDA perspective.","PeriodicalId":211660,"journal":{"name":"Sci. J. Riga Tech. Univ. Ser. Comput. Sci.","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An approach to classification of MDA tools\",\"authors\":\"Anton Chernichkin, O. Ņikiforova\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/v10143-009-0006-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An approach to classification of MDA tools Nowadays there is a wide variety of tools, supporting the idea of software development process to be enriched by the principles of modelling—the source code is being generated from the model. Many of these purporting to be \\\"MDA complaint\\\" as well. Model driven architecture offers an approach to software development process that provides a separation of concerns, keeping the appropriate level of abstraction on each stage of development. Furthermore, the source code can be generated in a formal way, requiring no interference from the developer. There are two types of software development tools: the former type represents the semiautomatic approach, where the software is supposed to be created using system's model and code transformations, also considering different types of routines, which are done manually, while the latter type is an automatic solution, where no manual steps or routines are required. The original article defines various perspectives on positioning of MDA tools among CASE tools for software development, as well as proposes a methodological approach on classification of MDA tools. One of the perspectives that can be used in the MDA tool classification approach corresponds with the Model Driven Development life cycle, while the other one defines the role of modelling and model application levels in a whole development process. In addition, various sets of features have been defined, in order to clarify the accordance level of these tools from the MDA perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sci. J. Riga Tech. Univ. Ser. Comput. Sci.\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sci. J. Riga Tech. Univ. Ser. Comput. Sci.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/v10143-009-0006-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sci. J. Riga Tech. Univ. Ser. Comput. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/v10143-009-0006-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

MDA工具的分类方法现在有各种各样的工具,支持通过建模原则来丰富软件开发过程的思想——源代码是从模型生成的。其中许多也声称是“MDA投诉”。模型驱动的体系结构为软件开发过程提供了一种方法,该方法提供了关注点分离,在每个开发阶段保持适当的抽象级别。此外,源代码可以以正式的方式生成,不需要开发人员的干预。有两种类型的软件开发工具:前一种类型代表半自动方法,其中软件应该使用系统模型和代码转换来创建,也考虑到不同类型的例程,这些例程是手动完成的,而后一种类型是自动解决方案,其中不需要手动步骤或例程。最初的文章定义了在软件开发的CASE工具中MDA工具定位的各种角度,并提出了一种MDA工具分类的方法论方法。可以在MDA工具分类方法中使用的透视图之一与模型驱动开发生命周期相对应,而另一个透视图定义了整个开发过程中建模和建模应用程序级别的角色。此外,还定义了各种特性集,以便从MDA的角度阐明这些工具的一致级别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An approach to classification of MDA tools
An approach to classification of MDA tools Nowadays there is a wide variety of tools, supporting the idea of software development process to be enriched by the principles of modelling—the source code is being generated from the model. Many of these purporting to be "MDA complaint" as well. Model driven architecture offers an approach to software development process that provides a separation of concerns, keeping the appropriate level of abstraction on each stage of development. Furthermore, the source code can be generated in a formal way, requiring no interference from the developer. There are two types of software development tools: the former type represents the semiautomatic approach, where the software is supposed to be created using system's model and code transformations, also considering different types of routines, which are done manually, while the latter type is an automatic solution, where no manual steps or routines are required. The original article defines various perspectives on positioning of MDA tools among CASE tools for software development, as well as proposes a methodological approach on classification of MDA tools. One of the perspectives that can be used in the MDA tool classification approach corresponds with the Model Driven Development life cycle, while the other one defines the role of modelling and model application levels in a whole development process. In addition, various sets of features have been defined, in order to clarify the accordance level of these tools from the MDA perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信