确定描述的句法条件

J. Odijk
{"title":"确定描述的句法条件","authors":"J. Odijk","doi":"10.1037/e493132004-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I will first show that a purely syntactic condition, closely related to the Binding Theory, imposes a restriction on the interpretation of definite descriptions. This restriction has, to my knowledge, not been observed before. Next, I will make a proposal as to how this condition can best be incorporated in a grammar model. I suggest that the condition can be naturally incorporated in the rules for interpreting syntactic discourse models. The proposal has additional advantages for the analysis of natural language, making it possible to avoid unnecessary and defer real ambiguities.","PeriodicalId":369207,"journal":{"name":"IPO Annual Progress Report","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A syntactic condition on definite descriptions\",\"authors\":\"J. Odijk\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e493132004-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper I will first show that a purely syntactic condition, closely related to the Binding Theory, imposes a restriction on the interpretation of definite descriptions. This restriction has, to my knowledge, not been observed before. Next, I will make a proposal as to how this condition can best be incorporated in a grammar model. I suggest that the condition can be naturally incorporated in the rules for interpreting syntactic discourse models. The proposal has additional advantages for the analysis of natural language, making it possible to avoid unnecessary and defer real ambiguities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IPO Annual Progress Report\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IPO Annual Progress Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e493132004-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IPO Annual Progress Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e493132004-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我将首先证明一个与约束理论密切相关的纯句法条件对确定描述的解释施加了限制。据我所知,这一限制以前从未出现过。接下来,我将提出一个建议,说明如何将这种情况最好地纳入语法模型。我建议,这个条件可以自然地纳入解释句法话语模型的规则中。该建议对于自然语言的分析还有其他优点,可以避免不必要的和延迟真正的歧义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A syntactic condition on definite descriptions
In this paper I will first show that a purely syntactic condition, closely related to the Binding Theory, imposes a restriction on the interpretation of definite descriptions. This restriction has, to my knowledge, not been observed before. Next, I will make a proposal as to how this condition can best be incorporated in a grammar model. I suggest that the condition can be naturally incorporated in the rules for interpreting syntactic discourse models. The proposal has additional advantages for the analysis of natural language, making it possible to avoid unnecessary and defer real ambiguities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信