平衡计分卡与替代成本系统的结合:对治理的有效贡献

A. Mcnab, Chris Carr, Falconer Mitchell
{"title":"平衡计分卡与替代成本系统的结合:对治理的有效贡献","authors":"A. Mcnab, Chris Carr, Falconer Mitchell","doi":"10.23823/SIBBALDIA/2010.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This project investigated whether a strategy framework such as the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), linked to a Performance Management System (PMS), would, compared to a more standard model of strategic planning, improve focus and research output by botanic gardens worldwide. The focus of the project shifted as the opportunity arose to develop an objective costing system linked to the related PMS, which allowed the researchers to posit that the BSC framework could provide a more effective contribution to governance. The research output was based on an in-depth case study at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh employing documentary analysis and innovative action research techniques adopting a constructive approach. This paper has been adapted for Sibbaldia having previously been published by the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) Research Project R220 (Macnab et al., 2010).","PeriodicalId":106362,"journal":{"name":"Sibbaldia: the Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Balanced Scorecard Combined with an Alternative Costing System: An Effective Contribution to Governance\",\"authors\":\"A. Mcnab, Chris Carr, Falconer Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.23823/SIBBALDIA/2010.139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This project investigated whether a strategy framework such as the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), linked to a Performance Management System (PMS), would, compared to a more standard model of strategic planning, improve focus and research output by botanic gardens worldwide. The focus of the project shifted as the opportunity arose to develop an objective costing system linked to the related PMS, which allowed the researchers to posit that the BSC framework could provide a more effective contribution to governance. The research output was based on an in-depth case study at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh employing documentary analysis and innovative action research techniques adopting a constructive approach. This paper has been adapted for Sibbaldia having previously been published by the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) Research Project R220 (Macnab et al., 2010).\",\"PeriodicalId\":106362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sibbaldia: the Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sibbaldia: the Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23823/SIBBALDIA/2010.139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibbaldia: the Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23823/SIBBALDIA/2010.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该项目调查了一个战略框架,如与绩效管理系统(PMS)相联系的平衡计分卡(BSC),与更标准的战略规划模型相比,是否能提高全球植物园的注意力和研究成果。随着开发与相关PMS相关的客观成本计算系统的机会出现,项目的重点转移,这使研究人员能够假设平衡计分卡框架可以为治理提供更有效的贡献。研究成果基于爱丁堡皇家植物园的深入案例研究,采用文献分析和创新的行动研究技术,采用建设性的方法。本文已改编为Sibbaldia,之前由特许管理会计师协会(CIMA)研究项目R220 (Macnab et al., 2010)出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Balanced Scorecard Combined with an Alternative Costing System: An Effective Contribution to Governance
This project investigated whether a strategy framework such as the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), linked to a Performance Management System (PMS), would, compared to a more standard model of strategic planning, improve focus and research output by botanic gardens worldwide. The focus of the project shifted as the opportunity arose to develop an objective costing system linked to the related PMS, which allowed the researchers to posit that the BSC framework could provide a more effective contribution to governance. The research output was based on an in-depth case study at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh employing documentary analysis and innovative action research techniques adopting a constructive approach. This paper has been adapted for Sibbaldia having previously been published by the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) Research Project R220 (Macnab et al., 2010).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信