智能手机人类活动识别(HAR)预测模型的比较

Muhmammad Ehsan
{"title":"智能手机人类活动识别(HAR)预测模型的比较","authors":"Muhmammad Ehsan","doi":"10.32350/air.0102.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report compared the performance of different classification algorithms such as decision tree, K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), logistic regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and random forest. The dataset comprised smartphones’ accelerometer and gyroscope readings of the participants while performing different activities, such as walking, walking downstairs, walking upstairs, standing, sitting, and laying. Different machine learning algorithms were applied to this dataset for classification and their accuracy rates were compared. KNN and SVM were found to be the most accurate of all. \nKEYWORDS— decision tree, Human Activity Recognition (HAR), K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), logistic regression, random forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM)","PeriodicalId":198719,"journal":{"name":"UMT Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Predictive Models of Human Activity Recognition (HAR) in Smartphones\",\"authors\":\"Muhmammad Ehsan\",\"doi\":\"10.32350/air.0102.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This report compared the performance of different classification algorithms such as decision tree, K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), logistic regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and random forest. The dataset comprised smartphones’ accelerometer and gyroscope readings of the participants while performing different activities, such as walking, walking downstairs, walking upstairs, standing, sitting, and laying. Different machine learning algorithms were applied to this dataset for classification and their accuracy rates were compared. KNN and SVM were found to be the most accurate of all. \\nKEYWORDS— decision tree, Human Activity Recognition (HAR), K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), logistic regression, random forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM)\",\"PeriodicalId\":198719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UMT Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UMT Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32350/air.0102.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UMT Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32350/air.0102.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了决策树、k近邻(KNN)、逻辑回归、支持向量机(SVM)和随机森林等不同分类算法的性能。该数据集包括参与者在进行不同活动时的智能手机加速度计和陀螺仪读数,如走路、下楼、上楼、站立、坐着和躺着。将不同的机器学习算法应用于该数据集进行分类,并比较其准确率。发现KNN和SVM是最准确的。关键词:决策树,人类活动识别(HAR), k近邻(KNN),逻辑回归,随机森林,支持向量机(SVM)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Predictive Models of Human Activity Recognition (HAR) in Smartphones
This report compared the performance of different classification algorithms such as decision tree, K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), logistic regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and random forest. The dataset comprised smartphones’ accelerometer and gyroscope readings of the participants while performing different activities, such as walking, walking downstairs, walking upstairs, standing, sitting, and laying. Different machine learning algorithms were applied to this dataset for classification and their accuracy rates were compared. KNN and SVM were found to be the most accurate of all. KEYWORDS— decision tree, Human Activity Recognition (HAR), K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), logistic regression, random forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信