ReadAid:一个健壮的全自动可读性评估工具

Rani Qumsiyeh, Yiu-Kai Ng
{"title":"ReadAid:一个健壮的全自动可读性评估工具","authors":"Rani Qumsiyeh, Yiu-Kai Ng","doi":"10.1109/ICTAI.2011.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading is an integral part of educational development, however, it is frustrating for people who struggle to understand (are not motivated to read, respectively) text documents that are beyond (below, respectively) their readability levels. Finding appropriate reading materials, with or without first scanning through their contents, is a challenge, since there are tremendous amount of documents these days and a clear majority of them are not tagged with their readability levels. Even though existing readability assessment tools determine readability levels of text documents, they analyze solely the lexical, syntactic, and/or semantic properties of a document, which are neither fully-automated, generalized, nor well-defined and are mostly based on observations. To advance the current readability analysis technique, we propose a robust, fully-automated readability analyzer, denoted ReadAid, which employs support vector machines to combine features from the US Curriculum and College Board, traditional readability measures, and the author(s) and subject area(s) of a text document d to assess the readability level of d. ReadAid can be applied for (i) filtering documents (retrieved in response to a web query) of a particular readability level, (ii) determining the readability levels of digitalized text documents, such as book chapters, magazine articles, and news stories, or (iii) dynamically analyzing, in real time, the grade level of a text document being created. The novelty of ReadAid lies on using authorship, subject areas, and academic concepts and grammatical constructions extracted from the US Curriculum to determine the readability level of a text document. Experimental results show that ReadAid is highly effective and outperforms existing state-of-the-art readability assessment tools.","PeriodicalId":332661,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ReadAid: A Robust and Fully-Automated Readability Assessment Tool\",\"authors\":\"Rani Qumsiyeh, Yiu-Kai Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTAI.2011.87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reading is an integral part of educational development, however, it is frustrating for people who struggle to understand (are not motivated to read, respectively) text documents that are beyond (below, respectively) their readability levels. Finding appropriate reading materials, with or without first scanning through their contents, is a challenge, since there are tremendous amount of documents these days and a clear majority of them are not tagged with their readability levels. Even though existing readability assessment tools determine readability levels of text documents, they analyze solely the lexical, syntactic, and/or semantic properties of a document, which are neither fully-automated, generalized, nor well-defined and are mostly based on observations. To advance the current readability analysis technique, we propose a robust, fully-automated readability analyzer, denoted ReadAid, which employs support vector machines to combine features from the US Curriculum and College Board, traditional readability measures, and the author(s) and subject area(s) of a text document d to assess the readability level of d. ReadAid can be applied for (i) filtering documents (retrieved in response to a web query) of a particular readability level, (ii) determining the readability levels of digitalized text documents, such as book chapters, magazine articles, and news stories, or (iii) dynamically analyzing, in real time, the grade level of a text document being created. The novelty of ReadAid lies on using authorship, subject areas, and academic concepts and grammatical constructions extracted from the US Curriculum to determine the readability level of a text document. Experimental results show that ReadAid is highly effective and outperforms existing state-of-the-art readability assessment tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2011.87\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2011.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

阅读是教育发展的一个组成部分,然而,对于那些努力理解(没有动力阅读,分别)超出(低于,分别)可读性水平的文本文档的人来说,这是令人沮丧的。找到合适的阅读材料,不管是否先浏览一下它们的内容,都是一个挑战,因为现在有大量的文档,而且很明显大多数文档都没有标记它们的可读性级别。尽管现有的可读性评估工具确定了文本文档的可读性级别,但它们仅分析文档的词法、语法和/或语义属性,这些属性既不是全自动的、一般化的,也不是定义良好的,而且主要基于观察。为了推进当前的可读性分析技术,我们提出了一个鲁棒的、全自动的可读性分析器,称为ReadAid,它使用支持向量机将来自美国课程和大学理事会的特征、传统的可读性度量以及文本文档d的作者和主题领域结合起来,以评估d的可读性水平。ReadAid可以应用于(i)过滤特定可读性水平的文档(响应web查询检索);(ii)确定数字化文本文档的可读性水平,如书籍章节、杂志文章和新闻故事,或(iii)实时动态分析正在创建的文本文档的等级水平。ReadAid的新颖之处在于使用作者身份、学科领域、从美国课程中提取的学术概念和语法结构来确定文本文档的可读性水平。实验结果表明,ReadAid是一种高效的可读性评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ReadAid: A Robust and Fully-Automated Readability Assessment Tool
Reading is an integral part of educational development, however, it is frustrating for people who struggle to understand (are not motivated to read, respectively) text documents that are beyond (below, respectively) their readability levels. Finding appropriate reading materials, with or without first scanning through their contents, is a challenge, since there are tremendous amount of documents these days and a clear majority of them are not tagged with their readability levels. Even though existing readability assessment tools determine readability levels of text documents, they analyze solely the lexical, syntactic, and/or semantic properties of a document, which are neither fully-automated, generalized, nor well-defined and are mostly based on observations. To advance the current readability analysis technique, we propose a robust, fully-automated readability analyzer, denoted ReadAid, which employs support vector machines to combine features from the US Curriculum and College Board, traditional readability measures, and the author(s) and subject area(s) of a text document d to assess the readability level of d. ReadAid can be applied for (i) filtering documents (retrieved in response to a web query) of a particular readability level, (ii) determining the readability levels of digitalized text documents, such as book chapters, magazine articles, and news stories, or (iii) dynamically analyzing, in real time, the grade level of a text document being created. The novelty of ReadAid lies on using authorship, subject areas, and academic concepts and grammatical constructions extracted from the US Curriculum to determine the readability level of a text document. Experimental results show that ReadAid is highly effective and outperforms existing state-of-the-art readability assessment tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信