液压马达主滑阀的机械和液压驱动策略

Grey C. Boyce-Erickson, Nathaniel J. Fulbright, J. Voth, T. Chase, Perry Y. Li, J. Ven
{"title":"液压马达主滑阀的机械和液压驱动策略","authors":"Grey C. Boyce-Erickson, Nathaniel J. Fulbright, J. Voth, T. Chase, Perry Y. Li, J. Ven","doi":"10.1115/fpmc2019-1687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A large variety of options for the internal valves of a hydraulic motor are available. Poppet valves, rotary valves, and port plates are common options, but each have drawbacks such as actuation force, complexity, leakage, or friction. An alternative type that is also common is spool valves. Spool valves require minimal actuation force and have low throttling losses if sized correctly. This paper compares two drive options for a mainstage spool valve: a hydraulic pilot from a rotary valve and mechanical actuation. Dynamic models of the two valve configurations are created to carry out design studies and evaluate the performance of the motor. Compressibility effects, viscous drag, and flow forces are included in the model. Simulations show that the rotary valve pilot operation causes an unacceptable lag in the motion of the spool that cannot be corrected without reducing performance when running in reverse. Furthermore, the rotary pilot stage drive results in the motor timing becoming retarded at higher operating speeds. For these reasons, mechanically actuated valves are preferred over pilot operated valves for hydraulic motors operated bi-directionally or across a wide speed range.","PeriodicalId":262589,"journal":{"name":"ASME/BATH 2019 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical and Hydraulic Actuation Strategies for Mainstage Spool Valves in Hydraulic Motors\",\"authors\":\"Grey C. Boyce-Erickson, Nathaniel J. Fulbright, J. Voth, T. Chase, Perry Y. Li, J. Ven\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/fpmc2019-1687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A large variety of options for the internal valves of a hydraulic motor are available. Poppet valves, rotary valves, and port plates are common options, but each have drawbacks such as actuation force, complexity, leakage, or friction. An alternative type that is also common is spool valves. Spool valves require minimal actuation force and have low throttling losses if sized correctly. This paper compares two drive options for a mainstage spool valve: a hydraulic pilot from a rotary valve and mechanical actuation. Dynamic models of the two valve configurations are created to carry out design studies and evaluate the performance of the motor. Compressibility effects, viscous drag, and flow forces are included in the model. Simulations show that the rotary valve pilot operation causes an unacceptable lag in the motion of the spool that cannot be corrected without reducing performance when running in reverse. Furthermore, the rotary pilot stage drive results in the motor timing becoming retarded at higher operating speeds. For these reasons, mechanically actuated valves are preferred over pilot operated valves for hydraulic motors operated bi-directionally or across a wide speed range.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASME/BATH 2019 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASME/BATH 2019 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/fpmc2019-1687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME/BATH 2019 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/fpmc2019-1687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

液压马达的内部阀有多种选择。锥阀,旋转阀,和端口板是常见的选择,但每个都有缺点,如执行力,复杂性,泄漏,或摩擦。另一种常见的类型是滑阀。滑阀需要最小的致动力,如果尺寸正确,节流损失低。本文比较了主滑阀的两种驱动选择:从旋转阀的液压先导和机械驱动。创建了两种阀配置的动态模型,以进行设计研究和评估电机的性能。模型中考虑了压缩效应、粘性阻力和流动力。仿真结果表明,旋转阀先导操作会导致阀芯运动出现不可接受的滞后,这种滞后在反向运行时不降低性能就无法纠正。此外,旋转先导级驱动导致电机在较高的运行速度下减速。由于这些原因,对于双向或宽速度范围的液压马达,机械驱动阀比先导操作阀更受欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanical and Hydraulic Actuation Strategies for Mainstage Spool Valves in Hydraulic Motors
A large variety of options for the internal valves of a hydraulic motor are available. Poppet valves, rotary valves, and port plates are common options, but each have drawbacks such as actuation force, complexity, leakage, or friction. An alternative type that is also common is spool valves. Spool valves require minimal actuation force and have low throttling losses if sized correctly. This paper compares two drive options for a mainstage spool valve: a hydraulic pilot from a rotary valve and mechanical actuation. Dynamic models of the two valve configurations are created to carry out design studies and evaluate the performance of the motor. Compressibility effects, viscous drag, and flow forces are included in the model. Simulations show that the rotary valve pilot operation causes an unacceptable lag in the motion of the spool that cannot be corrected without reducing performance when running in reverse. Furthermore, the rotary pilot stage drive results in the motor timing becoming retarded at higher operating speeds. For these reasons, mechanically actuated valves are preferred over pilot operated valves for hydraulic motors operated bi-directionally or across a wide speed range.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信