Afonso de Albuquerque, Thaiane Moreira de Oliveira, Marcelo Alves dos Santos Junior, Sofia Oliveira Firmo de Albuquerque
{"title":"传播领域去西方化的结构性限制:科睿唯安JCR系统的编辑委员会","authors":"Afonso de Albuquerque, Thaiane Moreira de Oliveira, Marcelo Alves dos Santos Junior, Sofia Oliveira Firmo de Albuquerque","doi":"10.1093/ccc/tcaa015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Since the 2000s, calls for de-Westernizing the international communication research have been common, but their practical result has been very modest, as the share of non-western countries remained minimal. This article explores the hypothesis that structural factors hamper the diversity in international media research, based on the analysis of the membership of journals listed in Clarivate's Journal of Citation Reports. The data demonstrate a strong unbalance in favor of the US -- and a particular group of US universities in special -- to the detriment of the non-Western countries. The article discusses these findings in reference to the emergence of academic capitalism and the global rankings logic, which is based on ``universal'' defined from a US (and secondarily Anglophonic) viewpoint. The JCR system plays an important role in this schema, as it artificially introduces scarcity in the international publishing system and, therefore, concentrates symbolic power in the hands of a few.","PeriodicalId":300302,"journal":{"name":"Communication, Culture and Critique","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural Limits to the De-Westernization of the Communication Field: The Editorial Board in Clarivate's JCR System\",\"authors\":\"Afonso de Albuquerque, Thaiane Moreira de Oliveira, Marcelo Alves dos Santos Junior, Sofia Oliveira Firmo de Albuquerque\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ccc/tcaa015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Since the 2000s, calls for de-Westernizing the international communication research have been common, but their practical result has been very modest, as the share of non-western countries remained minimal. This article explores the hypothesis that structural factors hamper the diversity in international media research, based on the analysis of the membership of journals listed in Clarivate's Journal of Citation Reports. The data demonstrate a strong unbalance in favor of the US -- and a particular group of US universities in special -- to the detriment of the non-Western countries. The article discusses these findings in reference to the emergence of academic capitalism and the global rankings logic, which is based on ``universal'' defined from a US (and secondarily Anglophonic) viewpoint. The JCR system plays an important role in this schema, as it artificially introduces scarcity in the international publishing system and, therefore, concentrates symbolic power in the hands of a few.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication, Culture and Critique\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication, Culture and Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaa015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication, Culture and Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaa015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
自2000年代以来,国际传播研究“去西方化”的呼声一直很普遍,但其实际效果非常有限,因为非西方国家的份额仍然很小。本文通过对Clarivate《Journal of Citation Reports》期刊成员的分析,探讨了结构性因素阻碍国际媒体研究多样性的假设。数据显示出一种强烈的不平衡,这种不平衡有利于美国,特别是一群美国大学,而不利于非西方国家。本文将根据学术资本主义的出现和全球排名逻辑来讨论这些发现,全球排名逻辑是基于美国(其次是英语国家)观点所定义的“普遍”。JCR系统在这一模式中扮演着重要的角色,因为它人为地在国际出版系统中引入了稀缺性,因此将象征性的权力集中在少数人手中。
Structural Limits to the De-Westernization of the Communication Field: The Editorial Board in Clarivate's JCR System
Since the 2000s, calls for de-Westernizing the international communication research have been common, but their practical result has been very modest, as the share of non-western countries remained minimal. This article explores the hypothesis that structural factors hamper the diversity in international media research, based on the analysis of the membership of journals listed in Clarivate's Journal of Citation Reports. The data demonstrate a strong unbalance in favor of the US -- and a particular group of US universities in special -- to the detriment of the non-Western countries. The article discusses these findings in reference to the emergence of academic capitalism and the global rankings logic, which is based on ``universal'' defined from a US (and secondarily Anglophonic) viewpoint. The JCR system plays an important role in this schema, as it artificially introduces scarcity in the international publishing system and, therefore, concentrates symbolic power in the hands of a few.