解决智能代理中的资源不兼容问题

Mariela Morveli Espinoza, A. Possebom, Cesar Augusto Tacla
{"title":"解决智能代理中的资源不兼容问题","authors":"Mariela Morveli Espinoza, A. Possebom, Cesar Augusto Tacla","doi":"10.1109/BRACIS.2017.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An intelligent agent may in general pursue multiple procedural goals simultaneously, which may lead to arise some conflicts (incompatibilities) among them. In this paper, we focus on the incompatibilities that emerge due to resources limitations. Thus, the contribution of this article is twofold. On one hand, we give an algorithm for identifying resource incompatibilities from a set of pursued goals and, on the other hand, we propose two ways for selecting those goals that will continue to be pursued: (i)the first is based on abstract argumentation theory, and (ii) the second based on two algorithms developed by us. We illustrate our proposal using examples throughout the article.","PeriodicalId":202240,"journal":{"name":"2017 Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resolving Resource Incompatibilities in Intelligent Agents\",\"authors\":\"Mariela Morveli Espinoza, A. Possebom, Cesar Augusto Tacla\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BRACIS.2017.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An intelligent agent may in general pursue multiple procedural goals simultaneously, which may lead to arise some conflicts (incompatibilities) among them. In this paper, we focus on the incompatibilities that emerge due to resources limitations. Thus, the contribution of this article is twofold. On one hand, we give an algorithm for identifying resource incompatibilities from a set of pursued goals and, on the other hand, we propose two ways for selecting those goals that will continue to be pursued: (i)the first is based on abstract argumentation theory, and (ii) the second based on two algorithms developed by us. We illustrate our proposal using examples throughout the article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BRACIS.2017.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BRACIS.2017.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

智能主体通常会同时追求多个过程目标,这可能会导致多个过程目标之间产生一些冲突(不兼容)。在本文中,我们主要关注由于资源限制而出现的不兼容性。因此,本文的贡献是双重的。一方面,我们给出了一种从一组追求目标中识别资源不兼容性的算法,另一方面,我们提出了两种选择将继续追求的目标的方法:(i)第一种是基于抽象论证理论,(ii)第二种是基于我们开发的两种算法。我们在整篇文章中使用示例来说明我们的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resolving Resource Incompatibilities in Intelligent Agents
An intelligent agent may in general pursue multiple procedural goals simultaneously, which may lead to arise some conflicts (incompatibilities) among them. In this paper, we focus on the incompatibilities that emerge due to resources limitations. Thus, the contribution of this article is twofold. On one hand, we give an algorithm for identifying resource incompatibilities from a set of pursued goals and, on the other hand, we propose two ways for selecting those goals that will continue to be pursued: (i)the first is based on abstract argumentation theory, and (ii) the second based on two algorithms developed by us. We illustrate our proposal using examples throughout the article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信