{"title":"文化差异和群体影响对承诺升级的影响","authors":"Richard J. Fairchild, Muhamad Chahrour","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3825645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most challenging decisions that a manager has to take is whether or<br>not to abandon a project which is not going well. Previous studies have looked at<br>different reasons for why individuals perserve with a troubled project. What the<br>previous research has failed to consider is how cultural differences might affect decision-makers’ willingness to continue or abandon a project. To better understand the factors<br>that might cause escalation of commitment, this dissertation investigates the influence<br>of cognitive factors and cultural differences on the escalation dynamics. Since most<br>decisions in the business world are made in groups, differences between individual and<br>group decisions are analysed as well. Overall, the findings indicate the salience of<br>certain cognitive factors in escalation behaviour, as previous researchers have found.<br>In addition, this study found that cultural differences can also affect the decision to<br>continue or abandon a project. Concerning the differences between the individual<br>and the group decisions, these results suggest that in terms of some determinants,<br>individuals from all cultures act the same, while with other factors the predisposition to<br>escalate depends on a person’s cultural background. The implications of these results<br>and different recommendations for both practice and further research are discussed.<br>","PeriodicalId":261576,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Corporations (Topic)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of cultural differences and group influence on the escalation of commitment\",\"authors\":\"Richard J. Fairchild, Muhamad Chahrour\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3825645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the most challenging decisions that a manager has to take is whether or<br>not to abandon a project which is not going well. Previous studies have looked at<br>different reasons for why individuals perserve with a troubled project. What the<br>previous research has failed to consider is how cultural differences might affect decision-makers’ willingness to continue or abandon a project. To better understand the factors<br>that might cause escalation of commitment, this dissertation investigates the influence<br>of cognitive factors and cultural differences on the escalation dynamics. Since most<br>decisions in the business world are made in groups, differences between individual and<br>group decisions are analysed as well. Overall, the findings indicate the salience of<br>certain cognitive factors in escalation behaviour, as previous researchers have found.<br>In addition, this study found that cultural differences can also affect the decision to<br>continue or abandon a project. Concerning the differences between the individual<br>and the group decisions, these results suggest that in terms of some determinants,<br>individuals from all cultures act the same, while with other factors the predisposition to<br>escalate depends on a person’s cultural background. The implications of these results<br>and different recommendations for both practice and further research are discussed.<br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":261576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AARN: Corporations (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AARN: Corporations (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3825645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Corporations (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3825645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The impact of cultural differences and group influence on the escalation of commitment
One of the most challenging decisions that a manager has to take is whether or not to abandon a project which is not going well. Previous studies have looked at different reasons for why individuals perserve with a troubled project. What the previous research has failed to consider is how cultural differences might affect decision-makers’ willingness to continue or abandon a project. To better understand the factors that might cause escalation of commitment, this dissertation investigates the influence of cognitive factors and cultural differences on the escalation dynamics. Since most decisions in the business world are made in groups, differences between individual and group decisions are analysed as well. Overall, the findings indicate the salience of certain cognitive factors in escalation behaviour, as previous researchers have found. In addition, this study found that cultural differences can also affect the decision to continue or abandon a project. Concerning the differences between the individual and the group decisions, these results suggest that in terms of some determinants, individuals from all cultures act the same, while with other factors the predisposition to escalate depends on a person’s cultural background. The implications of these results and different recommendations for both practice and further research are discussed.