《政治变革理论

Catherine E. De Vries, S. Hobolt
{"title":"《政治变革理论","authors":"Catherine E. De Vries, S. Hobolt","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvt9k3d3.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter outlines a theory of political change. This theory conceives of party competition as a constant struggle between dominant parties, the key players on the political market trying to defend their market power, and challenger parties, acting as disruptive political entrepreneurs trying to challenge this dominance through innovation. The chapter then explores the interplay of the three main conceptual building blocks: dominance, innovation, and transformation. Innovation is the process through which political parties introduce a new or previously ignored policy issue and aim to discredit dominant parties by employing antiestablishment rhetoric. Political parties will only engage in innovation when the potential benefits of doing so outweigh the costs. Challenger parties, especially those within permissive electoral systems, are most likely to engage in innovation, because of the costs and potential electoral risks to dominant parties associated with mobilizing issues different than the ones they traditionally do. Parties that wish to innovate are likely to choose issues that allow for a high degree of appropriability, issues that are not easily subsumed within the dominant dimension and that may internally split dominant parties.","PeriodicalId":434877,"journal":{"name":"Political Entrepreneurs","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Theory of Political Change\",\"authors\":\"Catherine E. De Vries, S. Hobolt\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvt9k3d3.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter outlines a theory of political change. This theory conceives of party competition as a constant struggle between dominant parties, the key players on the political market trying to defend their market power, and challenger parties, acting as disruptive political entrepreneurs trying to challenge this dominance through innovation. The chapter then explores the interplay of the three main conceptual building blocks: dominance, innovation, and transformation. Innovation is the process through which political parties introduce a new or previously ignored policy issue and aim to discredit dominant parties by employing antiestablishment rhetoric. Political parties will only engage in innovation when the potential benefits of doing so outweigh the costs. Challenger parties, especially those within permissive electoral systems, are most likely to engage in innovation, because of the costs and potential electoral risks to dominant parties associated with mobilizing issues different than the ones they traditionally do. Parties that wish to innovate are likely to choose issues that allow for a high degree of appropriability, issues that are not easily subsumed within the dominant dimension and that may internally split dominant parties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":434877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Entrepreneurs\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Entrepreneurs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt9k3d3.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Entrepreneurs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt9k3d3.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章概述了政治变革的理论。该理论认为政党竞争是主导政党之间的持续斗争,政治市场上的关键参与者试图捍卫自己的市场力量,而挑战者政党则是试图通过创新挑战这种主导地位的破坏性政治企业家。然后,本章探讨了三个主要概念构建模块的相互作用:主导地位、创新和转型。创新是政党引入一个新的或以前被忽视的政策问题,目的是通过使用反建制的言论来诋毁主导政党的过程。政党只有在潜在收益大于成本的情况下才会进行创新。挑战者政党,特别是那些在宽松选举制度下的政党,最有可能进行创新,因为占主导地位的政党在动员不同于他们传统做法的问题时所涉及的成本和潜在的选举风险。希望创新的政党可能会选择允许高度适当的问题,这些问题不容易被纳入主导维度,并且可能在内部分裂主导政党。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Theory of Political Change
This chapter outlines a theory of political change. This theory conceives of party competition as a constant struggle between dominant parties, the key players on the political market trying to defend their market power, and challenger parties, acting as disruptive political entrepreneurs trying to challenge this dominance through innovation. The chapter then explores the interplay of the three main conceptual building blocks: dominance, innovation, and transformation. Innovation is the process through which political parties introduce a new or previously ignored policy issue and aim to discredit dominant parties by employing antiestablishment rhetoric. Political parties will only engage in innovation when the potential benefits of doing so outweigh the costs. Challenger parties, especially those within permissive electoral systems, are most likely to engage in innovation, because of the costs and potential electoral risks to dominant parties associated with mobilizing issues different than the ones they traditionally do. Parties that wish to innovate are likely to choose issues that allow for a high degree of appropriability, issues that are not easily subsumed within the dominant dimension and that may internally split dominant parties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信