超文本系统中信息索引与检索的决策支持

Wenlie Zhu, M. Lehto
{"title":"超文本系统中信息索引与检索的决策支持","authors":"Wenlie Zhu, M. Lehto","doi":"10.1207/S15327590IJHC1104_5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study introduces and evaluates the performance of two statistical models intended to support the automatic creation of a subject-based index containing links to hypertext documents. The fuzzy Bayes model makes strong dependence assumptions, and only considers the strongest evidence presented by single words occurring in a document, whereas the classic Bayes model makes strong independence assumptions and attempts to aggregate all the evidence. The links or index terms suggested by both indexing models overlapped greatly with those assigned by a human indexer. However, the probabilities calculated using the classic Bayes model were unstable because of data sparseness and severe violations of the independence assumptions. Subsequent analysis therefore focused on the fuzzy Bayes model. The latter analysis revealed that human experts rated index terms suggested by the model significantly higher than randomly selected index terms. When the index terms assigned by the fuzzy Bayes model were implemented as ...","PeriodicalId":208962,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision Support for Indexing and Retrieval of Information in Hypertext Systems\",\"authors\":\"Wenlie Zhu, M. Lehto\",\"doi\":\"10.1207/S15327590IJHC1104_5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study introduces and evaluates the performance of two statistical models intended to support the automatic creation of a subject-based index containing links to hypertext documents. The fuzzy Bayes model makes strong dependence assumptions, and only considers the strongest evidence presented by single words occurring in a document, whereas the classic Bayes model makes strong independence assumptions and attempts to aggregate all the evidence. The links or index terms suggested by both indexing models overlapped greatly with those assigned by a human indexer. However, the probabilities calculated using the classic Bayes model were unstable because of data sparseness and severe violations of the independence assumptions. Subsequent analysis therefore focused on the fuzzy Bayes model. The latter analysis revealed that human experts rated index terms suggested by the model significantly higher than randomly selected index terms. When the index terms assigned by the fuzzy Bayes model were implemented as ...\",\"PeriodicalId\":208962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC1104_5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC1104_5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本研究介绍并评估了两种统计模型的性能,这两种模型旨在支持自动创建包含超文本文档链接的基于主题的索引。模糊贝叶斯模型做了强依赖性假设,只考虑文档中出现的单个单词所提供的最强证据,而经典贝叶斯模型做了强独立性假设,并试图汇总所有证据。两种索引模型建议的链接或索引项与人工索引器分配的链接或索引项有很大的重叠。然而,使用经典贝叶斯模型计算的概率由于数据稀疏性和严重违反独立性假设而不稳定。因此,随后的分析集中在模糊贝叶斯模型上。后一种分析表明,人类专家对模型建议的索引项的评价明显高于随机选择的索引项。当模糊贝叶斯模型分配的指标项实现为…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision Support for Indexing and Retrieval of Information in Hypertext Systems
This study introduces and evaluates the performance of two statistical models intended to support the automatic creation of a subject-based index containing links to hypertext documents. The fuzzy Bayes model makes strong dependence assumptions, and only considers the strongest evidence presented by single words occurring in a document, whereas the classic Bayes model makes strong independence assumptions and attempts to aggregate all the evidence. The links or index terms suggested by both indexing models overlapped greatly with those assigned by a human indexer. However, the probabilities calculated using the classic Bayes model were unstable because of data sparseness and severe violations of the independence assumptions. Subsequent analysis therefore focused on the fuzzy Bayes model. The latter analysis revealed that human experts rated index terms suggested by the model significantly higher than randomly selected index terms. When the index terms assigned by the fuzzy Bayes model were implemented as ...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信