从能力的角度衡量图形语言表达的有效性

ACM-SE 28 Pub Date : 1990-04-01 DOI:10.1145/98949.99060
John W. Olson, H. Longenecker
{"title":"从能力的角度衡量图形语言表达的有效性","authors":"John W. Olson, H. Longenecker","doi":"10.1145/98949.99060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The task of developing a metric to gauge the effectiveness of graphical presentation techniques in teaching computer and information science concepts involves the measurement of student competency. Previous work in the general subject area has ad­ dressed the use of with flowchart techniques in terms of student preference and timed response indicating a superiority of flowchart representation over pseudocode [7] Other research [3] is being directed at the elTicacy of graphic representation as a post factum tool for debugging and maintenance. The anticipated success of that study will only serve to emphasize the importance of validating the graphic approach for instructional use. Positive results have recently been achieved using a graphical method in introductory courses [4]. The current study aims to document the degree to which graphic presentation enhances student learn­ ing. The hypothesis for our work is that the graphi­ cal method is more direct [1] and will be proven to produce significant improvement in specific learning areas. Crucial to creation of an appropriate environ­ ment in which to test the hypothesis is the choice of a model and methodology which will enable the researchers to make concrete evaluations of progress based on observable performance. The goal is to eliminate subjective judgments of student accomp­ lishment. The competency model suggested by the ICCP [6] is a restatement of a taxonomy of objectives formulated in the mid 1950’s [2], The value of this taxonomy is that it addresses competency directly in terms of depth of knowledge. The model lends itself well to (he development of a metric because under­ lying the concept of depth of knowledge is the con­ straint that each depth level is discrete. The classification problems inherent in a continuous scale are thus avoided. This also coincides with the thrust of the graphical environment with its emphasis on","PeriodicalId":409883,"journal":{"name":"ACM-SE 28","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A metric for the effectiveness of graphical language presentation in terms of competency\",\"authors\":\"John W. Olson, H. Longenecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/98949.99060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The task of developing a metric to gauge the effectiveness of graphical presentation techniques in teaching computer and information science concepts involves the measurement of student competency. Previous work in the general subject area has ad­ dressed the use of with flowchart techniques in terms of student preference and timed response indicating a superiority of flowchart representation over pseudocode [7] Other research [3] is being directed at the elTicacy of graphic representation as a post factum tool for debugging and maintenance. The anticipated success of that study will only serve to emphasize the importance of validating the graphic approach for instructional use. Positive results have recently been achieved using a graphical method in introductory courses [4]. The current study aims to document the degree to which graphic presentation enhances student learn­ ing. The hypothesis for our work is that the graphi­ cal method is more direct [1] and will be proven to produce significant improvement in specific learning areas. Crucial to creation of an appropriate environ­ ment in which to test the hypothesis is the choice of a model and methodology which will enable the researchers to make concrete evaluations of progress based on observable performance. The goal is to eliminate subjective judgments of student accomp­ lishment. The competency model suggested by the ICCP [6] is a restatement of a taxonomy of objectives formulated in the mid 1950’s [2], The value of this taxonomy is that it addresses competency directly in terms of depth of knowledge. The model lends itself well to (he development of a metric because under­ lying the concept of depth of knowledge is the con­ straint that each depth level is discrete. The classification problems inherent in a continuous scale are thus avoided. This also coincides with the thrust of the graphical environment with its emphasis on\",\"PeriodicalId\":409883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM-SE 28\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM-SE 28\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/98949.99060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM-SE 28","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/98949.99060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在计算机和信息科学概念的教学中,开发一种度量标准来衡量图形表示技术的有效性,这一任务涉及到对学生能力的测量。以前在一般学科领域的工作已经从学生偏好和时间反应的角度阐述了流程图技术的使用,表明流程图表示优于伪代码b[7]其他研究b[3]正针对图形表示作为调试和维护的后期工具的优越性。这项研究的预期成功只会强调验证图形方法用于教学的重要性。最近在入门课程b[4]中使用图形方法取得了积极的结果。本研究的目的是记录图形呈现对学生学习的促进程度。我们工作的假设是,图解法更直接,并将被证明在特定的学习领域产生显著的改善。创造一个适当的环境来检验假设的关键是选择一种模型和方法,这将使研究人员能够根据可观察到的表现对进展作出具体的评估。其目的是消除对学生成绩的主观判断。ICCP[6]提出的胜任力模型是对20世纪50年代中期制定的目标分类学[6]的重述。该分类学的价值在于,它直接根据知识深度来处理胜任力。该模型非常适合度量的开发,因为知识深度概念的基础是每个深度级别是离散的约束。这样就避免了连续尺度固有的分类问题。这也与图形环境的主旨相吻合,它强调
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A metric for the effectiveness of graphical language presentation in terms of competency
The task of developing a metric to gauge the effectiveness of graphical presentation techniques in teaching computer and information science concepts involves the measurement of student competency. Previous work in the general subject area has ad­ dressed the use of with flowchart techniques in terms of student preference and timed response indicating a superiority of flowchart representation over pseudocode [7] Other research [3] is being directed at the elTicacy of graphic representation as a post factum tool for debugging and maintenance. The anticipated success of that study will only serve to emphasize the importance of validating the graphic approach for instructional use. Positive results have recently been achieved using a graphical method in introductory courses [4]. The current study aims to document the degree to which graphic presentation enhances student learn­ ing. The hypothesis for our work is that the graphi­ cal method is more direct [1] and will be proven to produce significant improvement in specific learning areas. Crucial to creation of an appropriate environ­ ment in which to test the hypothesis is the choice of a model and methodology which will enable the researchers to make concrete evaluations of progress based on observable performance. The goal is to eliminate subjective judgments of student accomp­ lishment. The competency model suggested by the ICCP [6] is a restatement of a taxonomy of objectives formulated in the mid 1950’s [2], The value of this taxonomy is that it addresses competency directly in terms of depth of knowledge. The model lends itself well to (he development of a metric because under­ lying the concept of depth of knowledge is the con­ straint that each depth level is discrete. The classification problems inherent in a continuous scale are thus avoided. This also coincides with the thrust of the graphical environment with its emphasis on
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信