两种根本不同的复合系统可靠性评估方法的比较

L. Salvaderi, R. Billinton
{"title":"两种根本不同的复合系统可靠性评估方法的比较","authors":"L. Salvaderi, R. Billinton","doi":"10.1109/TPAS.1985.318900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A wide range of techniques have been proposed for reliability evaluaticn in composite generation and transmission systems. Many of the proposed methods are basically variations on fundamental approaches to the problem. Over the years, however, it has become obvious that there are in general, basic conceptual differences between the techniques used in Europe, particularly Italy and France and those utilized in North America. This paper briefly illustrates some of the fundamental differences between these techniques for composite system reliability evaluation by applicaticn to the IEEE Reliability Test System.","PeriodicalId":227345,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison Between Two Fundamentally Different Approaches to Composite System Reliability Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"L. Salvaderi, R. Billinton\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TPAS.1985.318900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A wide range of techniques have been proposed for reliability evaluaticn in composite generation and transmission systems. Many of the proposed methods are basically variations on fundamental approaches to the problem. Over the years, however, it has become obvious that there are in general, basic conceptual differences between the techniques used in Europe, particularly Italy and France and those utilized in North America. This paper briefly illustrates some of the fundamental differences between these techniques for composite system reliability evaluation by applicaticn to the IEEE Reliability Test System.\",\"PeriodicalId\":227345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1985.318900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1985.318900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

摘要

针对复合发电和输电系统的可靠性评估,已经提出了一系列广泛的技术。许多提出的方法基本上都是解决这个问题的基本方法的变体。然而,多年来,欧洲,特别是意大利和法国使用的技术与北美使用的技术之间普遍存在着基本概念上的差异,这一点已经变得很明显。本文通过在IEEE可靠性测试系统中的应用,简要说明了这些综合系统可靠性评估技术之间的一些根本区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison Between Two Fundamentally Different Approaches to Composite System Reliability Evaluation
A wide range of techniques have been proposed for reliability evaluaticn in composite generation and transmission systems. Many of the proposed methods are basically variations on fundamental approaches to the problem. Over the years, however, it has become obvious that there are in general, basic conceptual differences between the techniques used in Europe, particularly Italy and France and those utilized in North America. This paper briefly illustrates some of the fundamental differences between these techniques for composite system reliability evaluation by applicaticn to the IEEE Reliability Test System.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信