高痛无获:加州阿拉米达县青少年管理费如何伤害低收入家庭

Alexander M Kaplan, Ahmed Lavalais, Tim Kline, J. Le, Rachel Draznin-Nagy, Ingrid V. Rodriguez, Jenny van der Heyde, Stephanie Campos-Bui, Jeffrey Selbin
{"title":"高痛无获:加州阿拉米达县青少年管理费如何伤害低收入家庭","authors":"Alexander M Kaplan, Ahmed Lavalais, Tim Kline, J. Le, Rachel Draznin-Nagy, Ingrid V. Rodriguez, Jenny van der Heyde, Stephanie Campos-Bui, Jeffrey Selbin","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2738710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"National attention is focused on racial and economic discrimination in the criminal justice system. Racially disproportionate interaction with the system leaves people of color with significantly more court-related debt. While criminal court debt has been described and condemned in the adult system, this issue has received virtually no attention in the juvenile system, where fees undermine rehabilitative goals. This report presents research findings about the practice of assessing and collecting fees on families with youth in the juvenile system in Alameda County, California. The County charges these fees to thousands of families who are already struggling to maintain economic and social stability, and the financial burden appears to fall most heavily on families of color. Although the fees are supposed to help the county recoup expenses, its own data suggest that the County barely recovers the most direct costs of collection.The report calls for an immediate moratorium and repeal on the assessment and collection of these regressive and racially discriminatory fees (NB: On March 29, 2019, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors imposed a fees moratorium and asked the relevant county departments to prepare for a full repeal by June 28, 2016).","PeriodicalId":372228,"journal":{"name":"Corrections & Sentencing Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High Pain, No Gain: How Juvenile Administrative Fees Harm Low-Income Families in Alameda County, California\",\"authors\":\"Alexander M Kaplan, Ahmed Lavalais, Tim Kline, J. Le, Rachel Draznin-Nagy, Ingrid V. Rodriguez, Jenny van der Heyde, Stephanie Campos-Bui, Jeffrey Selbin\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2738710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"National attention is focused on racial and economic discrimination in the criminal justice system. Racially disproportionate interaction with the system leaves people of color with significantly more court-related debt. While criminal court debt has been described and condemned in the adult system, this issue has received virtually no attention in the juvenile system, where fees undermine rehabilitative goals. This report presents research findings about the practice of assessing and collecting fees on families with youth in the juvenile system in Alameda County, California. The County charges these fees to thousands of families who are already struggling to maintain economic and social stability, and the financial burden appears to fall most heavily on families of color. Although the fees are supposed to help the county recoup expenses, its own data suggest that the County barely recovers the most direct costs of collection.The report calls for an immediate moratorium and repeal on the assessment and collection of these regressive and racially discriminatory fees (NB: On March 29, 2019, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors imposed a fees moratorium and asked the relevant county departments to prepare for a full repeal by June 28, 2016).\",\"PeriodicalId\":372228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corrections & Sentencing Law & Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corrections & Sentencing Law & Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2738710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corrections & Sentencing Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2738710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

全国的注意力集中在刑事司法系统中的种族和经济歧视。与司法系统的种族不相称的互动使有色人种背负了更多与法院有关的债务。虽然刑事法庭债务在成人系统中已经被描述和谴责,但这个问题在少年系统中几乎没有得到任何关注,在那里,费用破坏了康复的目标。本报告介绍了对加利福尼亚州阿拉米达县少年系统中有青少年的家庭进行评估和收取费用的实践研究结果。该县向数千个已经在为维持经济和社会稳定而苦苦挣扎的家庭收取这些费用,有色人种家庭似乎承受的经济负担最重。尽管这些费用本应帮助该县收回成本,但该县自己的数据显示,该县几乎无法收回征收税款的最直接成本。该报告呼吁立即暂停和废除这些倒退和种族歧视费用的评估和征收(注:2019年3月29日,阿拉米达县监事会暂停收费,并要求相关县部门准备在2016年6月28日前全面废除)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High Pain, No Gain: How Juvenile Administrative Fees Harm Low-Income Families in Alameda County, California
National attention is focused on racial and economic discrimination in the criminal justice system. Racially disproportionate interaction with the system leaves people of color with significantly more court-related debt. While criminal court debt has been described and condemned in the adult system, this issue has received virtually no attention in the juvenile system, where fees undermine rehabilitative goals. This report presents research findings about the practice of assessing and collecting fees on families with youth in the juvenile system in Alameda County, California. The County charges these fees to thousands of families who are already struggling to maintain economic and social stability, and the financial burden appears to fall most heavily on families of color. Although the fees are supposed to help the county recoup expenses, its own data suggest that the County barely recovers the most direct costs of collection.The report calls for an immediate moratorium and repeal on the assessment and collection of these regressive and racially discriminatory fees (NB: On March 29, 2019, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors imposed a fees moratorium and asked the relevant county departments to prepare for a full repeal by June 28, 2016).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信