眼科术后抗生素滴眼液的帽穿刺机制:是好是坏?

C. Wen, Yong Meng Hsien, M. Ami, R. A. Nasaruddin, M. Bastion, J. Hamzah
{"title":"眼科术后抗生素滴眼液的帽穿刺机制:是好是坏?","authors":"C. Wen, Yong Meng Hsien, M. Ami, R. A. Nasaruddin, M. Bastion, J. Hamzah","doi":"10.35119/myjo.v1i3.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A retrospective case series highlights two cases of postoperative endophthalmitis, in which similar improper technique of puncturing the antibiotic bottle with a nonsterile needle was noted. \nPatient A, a 65-year-old man with three weeks’ history of uneventful combined cataract and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) presented with acute painful right eye and vision blurring from 6/12 to 1/60 for two days. Examination showed severe anterior chamber activity and hazy fundal view. B-scan showed dense vitritis. Vitreous sampling revealed gram positive cocci, but no culture growth. Patient B, a 69-year-old man presented with three days’ history of right painful red eye and vision dropped to light perception following an uneventful cataract surgery. Examination showed severe anterior chamber activity with hypopyon, raised intraocular pressure, and no fundal view. B-scan detected dense vitritis with loculation. Vitreous sampling cultured Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Patient B. In both cases, the patients reported piercing the generic topical ciprofloxacin 0.3% bottle tip with a nonsterile needle instead of the prescribed method of using the sterile, inner aspect of the bottle cap. However, the cultures of the bottle contents were negative in both cases. Both patients received intravitreal, topical, and systemic antibiotics and subsequently underwent PPV. Patient A recovered vision to baseline, while Patient B recovered to counting finger vision. \nThe cap-puncturing mechanism for eye drop bottles is designed to maintain the sterility of the contents. However, this may backfire when patients do not understand the prescribed technique. We postulate that this improper technique predisposed the two cases to endophthalmitis. ","PeriodicalId":405983,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cap-puncturing mechanism for ophthalmic postoperative antibiotic eye drops: friend or foe?\",\"authors\":\"C. Wen, Yong Meng Hsien, M. Ami, R. A. Nasaruddin, M. Bastion, J. Hamzah\",\"doi\":\"10.35119/myjo.v1i3.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A retrospective case series highlights two cases of postoperative endophthalmitis, in which similar improper technique of puncturing the antibiotic bottle with a nonsterile needle was noted. \\nPatient A, a 65-year-old man with three weeks’ history of uneventful combined cataract and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) presented with acute painful right eye and vision blurring from 6/12 to 1/60 for two days. Examination showed severe anterior chamber activity and hazy fundal view. B-scan showed dense vitritis. Vitreous sampling revealed gram positive cocci, but no culture growth. Patient B, a 69-year-old man presented with three days’ history of right painful red eye and vision dropped to light perception following an uneventful cataract surgery. Examination showed severe anterior chamber activity with hypopyon, raised intraocular pressure, and no fundal view. B-scan detected dense vitritis with loculation. Vitreous sampling cultured Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Patient B. In both cases, the patients reported piercing the generic topical ciprofloxacin 0.3% bottle tip with a nonsterile needle instead of the prescribed method of using the sterile, inner aspect of the bottle cap. However, the cultures of the bottle contents were negative in both cases. Both patients received intravitreal, topical, and systemic antibiotics and subsequently underwent PPV. Patient A recovered vision to baseline, while Patient B recovered to counting finger vision. \\nThe cap-puncturing mechanism for eye drop bottles is designed to maintain the sterility of the contents. However, this may backfire when patients do not understand the prescribed technique. We postulate that this improper technique predisposed the two cases to endophthalmitis. \",\"PeriodicalId\":405983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaysian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaysian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35119/myjo.v1i3.33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35119/myjo.v1i3.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾性的病例系列突出两例术后眼内炎,其中类似的不当技术刺穿抗生素瓶用非无菌针被注意到。患者A, 65岁男性,既往行白内障合并睫状体部玻璃体切除术(PPV) 3周,术后6月12日至1月60日出现右眼急性疼痛,视力模糊2天。检查显示前房活动严重,眼底视野模糊。b超显示密集性玻璃体炎。玻璃体取样显示革兰氏阳性球菌,但未见培养物生长。患者B,一名69岁男性,在进行了一次顺利的白内障手术后,出现三天的右眼红痛和视力下降。检查显示严重的前房活动伴低视,眼压升高,无眼底视野。b超发现密集玻璃体炎伴定位。玻璃体取样培养了患者b的铜绿假单胞菌。在这两种情况下,患者报告用非无菌针刺穿通用的局部环丙沙星0.3%瓶口,而不是使用规定的无菌瓶盖内侧的方法。然而,在这两种情况下,瓶子内容物的培养均为阴性。两名患者均接受玻璃体内、局部和全身抗生素治疗,随后接受PPV治疗。患者A视力恢复到基线,患者B视力恢复到数指视力。用于滴眼液的瓶盖穿刺机制的设计是为了保持内容物的无菌性。然而,当患者不理解规定的技术时,这可能会适得其反。我们认为,这种不适当的技术倾向于这两个病例眼内炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cap-puncturing mechanism for ophthalmic postoperative antibiotic eye drops: friend or foe?
A retrospective case series highlights two cases of postoperative endophthalmitis, in which similar improper technique of puncturing the antibiotic bottle with a nonsterile needle was noted. Patient A, a 65-year-old man with three weeks’ history of uneventful combined cataract and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) presented with acute painful right eye and vision blurring from 6/12 to 1/60 for two days. Examination showed severe anterior chamber activity and hazy fundal view. B-scan showed dense vitritis. Vitreous sampling revealed gram positive cocci, but no culture growth. Patient B, a 69-year-old man presented with three days’ history of right painful red eye and vision dropped to light perception following an uneventful cataract surgery. Examination showed severe anterior chamber activity with hypopyon, raised intraocular pressure, and no fundal view. B-scan detected dense vitritis with loculation. Vitreous sampling cultured Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Patient B. In both cases, the patients reported piercing the generic topical ciprofloxacin 0.3% bottle tip with a nonsterile needle instead of the prescribed method of using the sterile, inner aspect of the bottle cap. However, the cultures of the bottle contents were negative in both cases. Both patients received intravitreal, topical, and systemic antibiotics and subsequently underwent PPV. Patient A recovered vision to baseline, while Patient B recovered to counting finger vision. The cap-puncturing mechanism for eye drop bottles is designed to maintain the sterility of the contents. However, this may backfire when patients do not understand the prescribed technique. We postulate that this improper technique predisposed the two cases to endophthalmitis. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信